Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 381–397 | Cite as

Asymmetry of price control and quantity control in an environmental policy

  • Eiji Hosoda


It is usually supposed that price control and quantity control are symmetrical in an environmental policy when there is no uncertainty. Thus, an emission charge is as effective as the trade of emission rights or entitlements as a tool for emission control. We show that the two instruments are asymmetrical under special technical conditions, even if there is no uncertainty: If there is an independent costly disposal process, whether it is a recycling process or an abatement process, in a constant-returns-to-scale economy, an emission charge cannot pinpoint a specific level of emissions whereas a quantity control such as trade of emission rights can do so, realizing the same value of emission charges as a shadow price or the price of emission rights.

Key words

Price control Quantity control Tax Emission rights Asymmetry 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1990) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Converse AO (1974) Environmental controls and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory 7:411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hodge I (1995) Environmental economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Hosoda E (1994) Growth and distribution under an environmental restriction. The Manchester School 62:60–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hosoda E (1996) An environmental restriction and income distribution in a capitalist economy. Metroeconomica 47:236–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kurz HD, Salvadori N (1995) Theory of production, a long-period analysis, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Spulber DF (1985) Effluent regulation and long-run optimality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 12:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Weitzman ML (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies 41:477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eiji Hosoda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations