Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 197–219 | Cite as

Environmental fiscal reform in Germany: a computable general equilibrium analysis

  • Heinz Welsch
  • Viola Ehrenheim


This article reports the effects of environmental fiscal reform recently undertaken in Germany. Our assessment uses a computable general equilibrium model of Germany and the rest of the European Union (EU) calibrated to input-output data for 1995. We found that the environmental fiscal reform yielded a moderate double dividend in terms of reduced CO2 emissions and increased employment but had little impact on the gross domestic product (GDP). Even though the manufacturing industries are facing reduced ecotax rates, the trend toward deindustrialization is strengthened owing to significant induced changes in the structure of demand. The favorable employment effect vanishes, and the GDP effect turns negative if there is an initial rise in employment that triggered rising wage claims. Effects elsewhere in the EU, especially in terms of emissions, are negligible.

Key words

Environmental fiscal reform Double dividend Computable general equilibrium 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers 16:159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arndt HW, Heins B, Hillebrand EC, Meyer W, Pfaffenberger W, Ströbele W (1998) Ökosteuern auf dem Prüfstand der Nachhaltigkeit. Analytica, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach S, Kohlhaas M, Meyer B, Praetorius B, Welsch H (2002) The effects of environmental fiscal reform in Germany: a simulation study. Energy Policy 30:803–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker T (1999) The effects on competitiveness of coordinated vs. unilateral fiscal policies reducing GHG emissions in the EU: an assessment of a 10% reduction by 2010 using the E3ME model. Energy Policy 26:1083–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beutel J (1999) Input-output tables for the European Union 1995. Report to the Statistical Office of the European Communities, Konstanz/LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  6. Böhringer C (2002) Environmental tax differentiation between industries and households: implications for efficiency and employment. ZEW Discussion Paper 02–08. Boehringer, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  7. Böhringer C, Rutherford TC, Pahlke A, Fahl U, Voss A (1997) Volkswirtschaftliche Effekte einer Umstrukturierung des deutschen Steuersystems unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Umweltsteuern. IER, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosello F, Carraro C, Galeotti M (2001) The double-dividend issue: modeling strategies and empirical findings. Environment and Development Economics 6:9–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burniaux J-M, Martin JP, Nicoletti G, Olivera Martins J (1992) A multi-sector, multi-region general equilibrium model for quantifying the costs of curbing CO2 emissions: a technical manual. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 116. OECO, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buttermann HG, Hillebrand B (1996) Sektorale und regionale Wirkungen von Energiesteuern. Untersuchungen des RWI, no. 19. RWI, EssenGoogle Scholar
  11. Conrad K, Schmidt TFN (1998) Coordinated CO2 policy in the EU: an AGE analysis. Economic Systems Research 10:161–182Google Scholar
  12. Conrad K, Wang J (1993) Quantitative Umweltpolitik: gesamtwirtschaftliche Auswirkungen einer CO2-Besteuerung in Deutschland (West). Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 213:308–324Google Scholar
  13. DIW (1995) Wirtschaftliche Auswirkungen einer ökologischen Steuerreform. Sonderhefte des DIW No. 153, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. EUROSTAT (1992) National accounts: input output tables 1985. EUROSTAT, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  15. Forum für Energiemodelle und Energiewirtschaftliche Systemanalysen (1999) Energiemodelle zum Klimaschutz in Deutschland: Strukturelle und gesamtwirtschaftliche Auswirkungen aus nationaler Perspektive. Physica, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoster F, Welsch H, Böhringer C (1997) CO2 abatement and economic structural change in the European internal market. Physica, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IEA (1998a) Energy balances of OECD countries. IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. IEA (1998b) Energy statistics of OECD Countries. IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. IEA (1999a) Electricity information. IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. IEA (1999b) Energy prices and taxes. IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC (1995) Climate change 1995: economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemfert C, Welsch H (2000) Energy-capital-labor substitution and the economic effects of CO2 abatement: evidence for Germany. Journal of Policy Modeling 22:641–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer B, Welfens PJJ (2001) CO2 taxes, growth, labor market effects and structural change: an empirical analysis. In: Welfens PJJ (ed) Internationalization of the economy and environmental policy options. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearce D (1991) The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming, The Economic Journal 101:938–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Statistisches Bundesamt (1997) Kostenstruktur der Unternehmen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes sowie des Bergbaus und der Gewinnung von Steinen und Erden. Fachserie 4: Produzierendes Gewerbe. Series 4.3. Schaefer-Pöschel, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  27. Statistisches Bundesamt (1998) Beschäftigung, Umsatz und Energieversorgung der Unternehmen und Betriebe des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes sowie des Bergbaus und der Gewinnung von Steinen und Erden. Fachserie 4: Produzierendes Gewerbe. Series 4.1.1. Schaefer-Pöschel, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  28. Statistisches Bundesamt (1999) Input-output Tabellen 1995. Fachserie 18: Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen. Series 2. Schaefer-Pöschel, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  29. Umweltrat (2000) Umweltgutachten 2000. www.umweltrat.de/gut00kf2
  30. Welsch H (1996) Recycling of carbon/energy taxes and the labor market: a general equilibrium analysis for the European community. Environmental and Resource Economics 8:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Welsch H, Hoster F (1995) A general equilibrium analysis of European carbon/energy taxation: model structure and macroeconomic results. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 115:275–303Google Scholar
  32. Welsch H, Ochsen C (2002) The determinants of aggregate energy use in West Germany. Discussion Paper V-244-02. Department of Economics, University of OldenburgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heinz Welsch
    • 1
  • Viola Ehrenheim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations