Abstract
When dealing with questions of scientific responsibility, we are often concerned with the ethical implications of new and promising but at the same time risky advances in technology and with the responsibility researchers might bear for the application of their scientific results. One very well known example is the question of whether or not the physicists and engineers of the atomic bomb were — at least partly — morally responsible for the bombing of Hiroshima, because their research technically enabled a form of killing that otherwise would not have been possible. Similar problems of responsibility currently arise in the field of biomedicine. Biologists, physicians and other scientists, who are engaged in the development of technologies like reproductive cloning that can be used in morally questionable ways, are increasingly asked to assume some responsibility for the use of their research by others. Ethicists are dealing with the question of how much responsibility (if any) can be ascribed to someone who’s action was not inherently morally wrong but can be used in morally blameworthy ways.
More rarely it is asked however, if and how much responsibility a user of research results bears for morally questionably or even clearly immoral research that had been conducted that was necessary for his or her work to be carried out Insofar as these questions are dealing with responsibility that in the end must be born by more than one agent, both questions also raise issues of shared or collective responsibility. In this article I will focus on the issue of moral responsibility as it is related to the use of results that were obtained in a morally questionable way. Insofar as the actions that I will focus on are not inherently morally wrong they might be considered to be examples of “moral complicity”.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angell, Marcia, The Nazi Hypothermia Experiments and Unethical Research Today, in: The New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 322 No. 20 (1990), 1462–1464
Baader, Gerhard, Opfer der Medizin im Nationalsozialismus, in: Wiesemann, Claudia/Frewer, Andreas (Hrsg.), Medizin und Ethik im Zeichen von Auschwitz. 50 Jahre Nürnberger Ärzteprozesse, in der Reihe: Erlanger Stufien zur Ethik in der Medizin, Band 5, Erlangen/Jena, 1996
Birnbacher, Dieter (ed.): Bioethik als Tabu? Toleranz und ihre Grenzen, Proceedings of a conference in Duesseldorf 2000 (in: Sass, H.-M. (ed.), Practical Ethics. Controversies, Bochum, Georgetown Vol. 1)
Brody, Baruch A., Research Ethics: International Perspectives, in: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics Vol. 6 (1997), 376–384
Buchanan, Allen, Judging the Past. The Case of the Human Radiation Experiments, in: Hastings Center Report 26, No.3 (May–June 1996), 25–30
Cassirer, Ernst, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Darmstadt, 1964
Childress, James F., Konsens in Ethik und Politik. Am Beispiel der Forschung an fötalem Gewebe, in: Bayertz, Kurt (Hrsg.), Moralischer Konsens: technische Eingriffe in die menschliche Fortpflanzung als Modellfall, Frankfurt a.M. 1996, 203–236.
Elkeles, Barbara, Der moralische Diskurs über das medizinische Menschenexperiment im 19. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart/Jena/New York, 1996
Friele, M.B. (ed.), Embryo Experimentation in Europe, Europaeische Akademie Grey Series 2001
Harris, Sheldon H., Factories of Death: Japanese Biological Welfare 1932–1945 and the American Cover-up
Lauritzen, P. (ed.): Cloning and the Future of Human Embryo Research, Oxford University Press 2001
Luna, Florencia, Vulnerable Populations and Morally Tainted Experiments, in: Bioethics Vol. 11 No. 3 & 4 (1997), 256–264
McCullagh, Peter, The Foetus as Transplant Donor. Scientific, Social and Ethical Perspectives, UMI Books on Demand, Michigan, 1987
Report of the Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research Panel. II Vols. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD 1988
Singer, Peter, Practical Ethics, Cambridge 1993
Stell, Lance K., The Blessings of Injustice. Animals and the Right to Accept Medical Treatment, in: Between the Species, Winter & Spring (1995), 42–53
Thiele, Felix, Moral Problems in the Patenting of Human Genes, in: Newsletter No 21 (July 2000), Europäische Akademie Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
Williams, B., Which Slopes are Slippery?, in Lockwood, Michael (ed.) Moral Dilemmas in Modern Medicine, Oxford/New York 1985
Zentrale Ethikkommission bei der Bundesärztekammer (Federal Medical Association), Übertragung von Nervenzellen in das Gehirn von Menschen, Deutsches Ärzteblatt 95, Heft 30, 24. Juli 1998 (53), C-1389–C-1391
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friele, M.B. The extent of collective responsibility in medical science. Monash Bioethics Review 20, S62–S75 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351260
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351260