Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 48–54 | Cite as

Age-and gender-related variations of leg power output and body composition in severely obese children and adolescents

  • A. Sartorio
  • F. Agosti
  • A. De Col
  • C. L. Lafortuna
Original Articles


A low level of physical activity is considered to be both a determinant factor and a negative effect of childhood obesity, notably contributing to its development and maintenance, but the motor capabilities of obese children of different ages have scarcely been evaluated. The purpose of the study is to depict the general trends of muscle anaerobic performance in a cohort of obese Italian children. Three-hundred-six obese children (141 males, 165 females), aged 10–17 yr with body mass index (BMI) range 28.9–62.0 kg/m2 (mean BMI z-score: 2.71±0.56 SD; range: 1.6–4.5), were cross-sectionally studied. Lower? limb maximal anaerobic power output ( W ) was assessed with the Margaria stair climbing test, and a consistent subgroup of 77 subjects (37 males, 40 females) was also selected for accessory study of body composition with bioimpedance analysis (BIA), in order to evaluate the relationships between fat-free mass (FFM) and W. In both genders,.W increased significantly for effect of age and degree of obesity [three-factor multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), p<0.001], but, while no difference was found between boys and girls in the age groups of 10–11 and 12–13 yr (post-hoc Tukey test, p>0.05), boys in the age groups 14–15 and 16–17 yr were more powerful than girls of the same age (p<0.001), wherease the relative W per unit body mass W BM) was higher (two-factor MANOVA) in boys (p<0.01) of all age groups (p>0.05). In the subgroup tested with BIA, the amount of FFM increased significantly [two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), p<0.001 ] according to age, being similar in males and females in lower age groups (post-hoc Tukey test, p>0.05), but higher in boys of older groups (post-hoc Tukey test, p≤ 0.001), so that all differences between age groups and genders disappeared (two-factor MANOVA) when W was expressed per unit FFM (p>0.05). A significant linear correlation was found between FFM and W, (R2=0.66, p<0.001). In conclusion, no difference in absolute W can be detected between obese boys and girls up to the age of 13, but W differences observed in older age groups appear to be consistent with a concomitant gender-related variation in body composition. The capability of performing external ? work in short bursts (as represented by trends in Wbm) is lower in girls of all ages, and merits consideration on the clinical ground.


Muscular anaerobic power Margaria test bioelectric impedance analysis childhood obesity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R, IASO International Obesity Task Force. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev 2004, 5 (Suppl 1): 4–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dietz WH. Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics 1998, 101: 518–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deckelbaum RJ, Williams CL. Childhood obesity: the health issue. Obes Res 2001, 9 (Suppl 4): 239S–43S PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flodmark CE, Lissau I, Moreno LA, Pietrobelli A, Widhalm K. New insights into the field of children and adolescents’ obesity: the European perspective. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004, 28: 1189–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graf C, Koch B, Kretschmann-Kandel E, et al. Correlation between BMI, leisure habits and motor abilities in childhood (CHILT-project). Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004, 28: 22–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Török K, Szelényi Z, Pòrszàsz J, Molnàr D. Low physical performance in obese adolescent boys with metabolic syndrome. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001, 25: 966–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deforche B, Lefevre J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Hills A P, Duquet W, Bouckaert J. Physical fitness and physical activity in obese and nonobese Flemish youth. Obes Res 2003, 11: 434–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trost SG, Kerr LM, Ward DS, Pate RR. Physical activity and determinants of physical activity in obese and non-obese children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001, 25. 822–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loftin M, Sothern M, Trosclair L, O’Hanlon A, Miller J, Udall J. Scaling VO2 peak in obese and non-obese girls. Obes Res 2001, 9: 290–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gidding SS, Nehgme R, Heise C, Muscar C, Linton A, Hassink S. Severe obesity associated with cardiovascular deconditioning, high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes mellitus/hyperinsulinemia, and respiratory compromise. J Pediatr 2004, 144: 766–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sartorio A, Proietti M, Marinone PG, Agosti F, Adorni F, Lafortuna CL. Influence of gender, age and BMI on lower limb muscular power output in a large population of obese men and women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004, 28: 91–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lafortuna CL, Maffiuletti NA, Agosti F, Sartorio A. Gender variations of body composition, muscle strength and power output in morbid obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2005, 29: 833–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garn SM, Clark DC. Nutrition, growth, development, and maturation: findings from the ten-state nutrition survey of 1968–1970. Pediatrics 1975, 56: 306–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cacciari E, Milani S, Balsamo A, et al. Italian cross-section charts for height, weight and BMI (6–20 y). Eur J Clin Nutr 2002, 56: 171–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications 1962.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Margaria R, Aghemo P, Rovelli E. Measurement of muscular power (anaerobic) in man. J Appl Physiol 1966, 21: 1662–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sartorio A, Narici MV, Fumagalli E, Faglia G, Lafortuna CL. Aerobic and anaerobic performance before and after a short-term body mass reduction program in obese subjects. Diabetes Nutr Metab 2001, 14: 51–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sartorio A, Fontana P, Trecate L, Lafortuna CL. Short-term changes of fatigability and muscle performance in severe obese patients after an integrated body mass reduction program. Diabetes Nutr Metab 2003, 16: 88–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sartorio A, Lafortuna CL, Agosti F, Proietti M, Maffiuletti NA. Elderly obese women display the greatest improvement in stair climbing performance after a 3-wk body mass reduction program. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004, 28: 1097–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lafortuna CL, Fumagalli E, Vangeli V, Sartorio A. Lower limb alactic anaerobic power output assessed with different techniques in morbid obesity. J Endocrinol Invest 2002, 25: 134–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lukaski HC, Bolonchuk WW, Hall CB, Siders WA. Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical measurements to assess human body composition. J Appl Physiol 1986, 60: 1327–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Houtkooper LB, Going SB, Lohman TG, Roche AF, Van Loan M. Bioelectrical impedance estimation of fat-free body mass in children and youth: a crossvalidation study. J Appl Physiol 1992, 72: 366–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall International Editions. 1984.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Veldhuis JD, Roemmich JN, Richmond EJ, et al. Endocrine control of body composition in infancy, childhood, and puberty. Endocr Rev 2005, 26: 114–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kanehisa H, Ikegawa S, Tsunoda N, Fukunaga T. Cross-sectional areas of fat and muscle in limbs during growth and middle age. Int J Sports Med 1994, 15: 420–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Neu CM, Rauch F, Rittweger J, Manz F, Schoenau E. Influence of puberty on muscle development at the forearm. Am J Physiol 2001, 283: E103–7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duché P, Ducher G, Lazzer S, Doré E, Tailardhat M, Bedu M. Peak power in obese and nonobese adolescents: effects of gender and braking force. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002, 34: 2072–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE) 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Sartorio
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Agosti
    • 2
  • A. De Col
    • 3
  • C. L. Lafortuna
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of AuxologyItaly
  2. 2.Laboratory for Experimental Endocrinological ResearchItaly
  3. 3.Laboratory for Experimental Auxo-Endocrinological ResearchItalian Institute for Auxology, IRCCSMilano and Piancavallo (VB)Italy
  4. 4.Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and PhysiologyCNRSegrate (MI)Italy

Personalised recommendations