Skip to main content
Log in

Inter and intra-individual variability of sperm morphology after selection with three different techniques: Layering, swimup from pellet and percoll

  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sperm morphology has been suggested to be one of the most reliable factor in predicting male fertility potential both in spontaneous cycles and in assisted reproduction. In this work the morphology of spermatozoa selected with three different techniques (layering, swimup from pellet and mini-percoll) has been assessed and compared in 20 infertile patients. All the techniques allowed the recovery of sperm populations of a better quality than in basal samples, with a higher percentage of normal forms (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed among the three different techniques in selecting sperm populations. The scatter diagrams comparing pairwise differences between the methods against their means regard the percentage of normal forms selected show a great (over 20%) inter and intra-individual variability. These data demonstrate that the three techniques select different percentages of normal spermatozoa, even in the same patient. Since it is crucial to obtain the highest number of morphologically normal and motile spermatozoa and each technique may provide different results in a given patient, we suggest that at least two techniques of sperm selection be performed before assisted reproduction procedures. This combined testing could also be relevant in the prognostic evaluation of the infertile male, since it explores the different characteristics of sperm function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bostofte E., Serup J., Rebbe H. Relation between morphologically abnormal spermatozoa and pregnancies obtained during a twenty-year follow-up period. Int. J. Androl. 5: 379, 1982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahadevan M.M., Trounson A.O. The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 42: 400, 1984.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobayashi T., Jinno M., Sugimura K., Nozawa S., Sugiyama T., Lida E. Sperm morphological assessment based on strict criteria and in-vitro outcome. Hum. Reprod. 6: 983, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu D.Y., Baker H.W.G. Tests of human sperm function and fertilization in vitro. Fertil. Steril. 58: 465, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soffer Y., Golan A., Herman A., Pansky M., Caspi E., Ron-El R. Prediction of in-vitro fertilization outcome by sperm penetration assay with TEST-yolk buffer preincubation. Fertil. Steril. 58: 556, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Punjabi U., Gerris J., vanBijlen J., Delbeke L., Gielis M., Buytaert P.H. Comparison between different pre-treatment techniques for sperm recovery prior to intrauterine insemination, GIFT or IVF. Hum. Reprod. 5: 75, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopata A., Patullo M.J, Chang A., James B. A method for collecting motile spermatozoa from human semen. Fertil. Steril. 27: 677, 1976.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aitken R.J., Clarkson J.S. Significance of reactive oxygen species in defining the efficacy of sperm preparation techniques. J. Androl. 9: 367, 1988.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mortimer D. Sperm preparation techniques and iatrogenic failures of in-vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 6: 173, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger T., Marrs R.P., Moyer D.L. Comparison of techniques for selection of motile spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril. 43: 268, 1985.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ord T., Patrizio P., Marello E., Balmaceda J.P., Asch R.H. Mini-Percoll: a new method of semen preparation for IVF in severe male factor infertility. Hum. Reprod. 5: 987, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis R.O., Bain D.E., Siemers R.J., Thal D.M., Andrew J.B., Gravance C.G. Accuracy and precision of the CellForm-Human automated sperm morphometry instrument. Fertil. Steril. 58: 826, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WHO Laboratory Manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, 1992.

  14. Schoenfeld C., Amelar R.D., Dubin L., Amelar S. A new staining technique for the rapid determination of the morphologic characteristics of sperm. Fertil. Steril. 36: 408, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307, 1986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. VanDerZwalmen P., Bertin-Segal G., Geerts L., Debauche C., Schoysman R. Sperm morphology and IVF pregnancy rate: comparison between Percoll gradient centrifugation and swim-up procedures. Hum. Reprod. 6: 581, 1991.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng F.L.H., Liu D.Y., Baker H.W.G. Comparison of Percoll, mini-Percoll and swim-up methods for sperm preparation from abnormal semen samples. Hum. Reprod. 7: 261, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwartz D., Ducot B., Auroux M., Collin C. Within-subject variability of the percentage of mophologically abnormal spermatozoa among infertile men: biological and measurement components. Hum. Reprod. 1: 369, 1986.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canale, D., Giorgi, P.M., Gasperini, M. et al. Inter and intra-individual variability of sperm morphology after selection with three different techniques: Layering, swimup from pellet and percoll. J Endocrinol Invest 17, 729–732 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03347769

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03347769

Key-words

Navigation