Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 258–267 | Cite as

A comparative study of factors related to carrying out physical activities of daily living (PADL) among 75-year-old men and women in two nordic localities

  • P. Laukkanen
  • E. Heikkinen
  • M. Schroll
  • M. Kauppinen
Original Article


The aim of this cross-sectional and cross-national study was to describe and compare the ability to carry out physical activities of daily living (PADL) and examine factors that might explain variation in this ability in two Nordic populations. Seven hundred and six men and women aged 75 from two populations (Glostrup, Denmark, and Jyväskylä, Finland) were interviewed and given a laboratory examination in 1989–90. The ability to carry out the PADL activities was studied by interview. Tests were given to determine depressive symptoms, cognitive capacity, and selected physical and sensory performance domains. Four different regression models (men and women in Jyväskylä and Glostrup) were used to analyze a number of variables describing physical and psychological health and performance related to the PADL. Knee extension strength and stair mounting height in three models (men and women in Jyväskylä and women in Glostrup), and walking speed in one model (men in Glostrup) emerged as explanatory factors on the basis of the physical performance tests done. Sight, except in the women in Glostrup, hearing in the men in Jyväskylä, and balance in the women in Glostrup also explained PADL functioning. In addition, symptoms of depression in the men in Glostrup, and symptoms of illness, except in the men in Jyväskylä, and cognitive capacity in the men in Jyväskylä emerged as explanatory factors in the regression models. There were, however, no major differences in the determinants of PADL functioning in the two Nordic populations of elderly people. Physical, psychological and sensory tests provide useful information, complementary to self-reports regarding declining PADL functional capacity.

Key words

ADL aged comparative study PADL performance tests 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    WHO: Report of a WHO Scientific Group on the epidemiology of aging. The uses of epidemiology in the study of the elderly. World Health Organization, Technical Report Series 706, Geneva, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris T., Kovar M.G., Suzman R., Kleinman J.C., Feldman J.J.: Longitudinal study of physical ability in the oldest-old. Am. J. Public Health 79: 698–702, 1989.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Svanborg A.: The health of the elderly population: results from longitudinal studies with age-cohort comparisons. In: Evered D., Wheeland J. (Eds.), Research and the Ageing Population Ciba Foundation Symposium (134). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1988, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heikkinen E., Era P., Jokela J., Jylhä M., Lyyra A-L., Pohjolainen P.: Socio-economic and life-style factors as modulators of health and functional capacity with age. In: Schroots J.J.F. (Ed.), Aging. Health and Competence. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martelin T.: Trends in elderly mortality in the Nordic Countries. Compr. Gerontol. C 1: 39–48, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heikkinen E., Waters W.E., Brzezinski Z.J.: The Elderly in Eleven Countries. WHO, Public Health in Europe 21, Copenhagen, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jylhä M., Jokela J., Tolvanen E., Heikkinen E., Heikkinen R-L., Koskinen S., Leskinen E., Lyyra A-L., Pohjolainen P.: The Tampere Longitudinal Study on Ageing. Scand. J. Soc. Med. (Suppl. 47), 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fillenbaum G.G.: Screening the elderly: a brief instrumental activities of daily living measure. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 33: 698–706, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guralnik J.M., Kaplan G.A.: Predictors of healthy aging: prospective evidence from the Alameda Study. Longitudinal study of physical ability in the oldest-old. Am. J. Public Health 79: 703–708, 1989.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katz S., Stroud III M.W.: Functional assessment in geriatrics. A review of progress and directions. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 37:267–271, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lawton M.P.: Aging and performance of home tasks. Hum. Factors 32: 527–536, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guralnik J.M., LaCroix A.Z.: Assessing physical function in older populations. In: Wallace R.B., Woolson R.F. (Eds.), The Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly. Oxford University Press, New York, 1992, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerety M.B., Mulrow C.D., Tuley M.R., Hazuda H.P., Lichtenstein M.J., Bohannon R., Kanten D.N., O’Neil M.B., Gorton A.: Development and validation of a physical performance instrument for the functionally impaired elderly: the physical disability index (PDI). J. Gerontol. 48: M33–M38, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nikolaus T., Bach M., Oster P., Schlierf G.: The timed test of money counting: A simple method of recognizing geriatric patients at risk for increased health care. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 7: 179–183, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ensrud K.E., Nevitt M.C., Yunis C., Cauley J.A., Seeley D.G., Fox K.M., Cummings S.R.: Correlates of impaired function in older women. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 42: 481–489, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laukkanen P., Era P., Heikkinen R-L., Suutama T., Kauppinen M., Heikkinen E.: Factors related to carrying out everyday activities among elderly people aged 80. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 6: 433–443, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Avlund K., Schroll M., Davidsen M., Løvborg B., Rantanen T.: Maximal isometric muscle strength and functionally ability in daily activities among 75-year old men and women. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 4: 32–40, 1994a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shanas E., Townsend P., Wedderburn D., Friis H., Milhoj P., Stehouwer J.: Old people in three industrial societies. Atherton Press, London, 1968.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Avlund K., Davidsen M., Schroll M., Gause-Nilsson I., Laukkanen P., Heikkinen E.: Self-reported functional ability in three Nordic localities. A comparative study of activities of daily living among 75-year-old men and women in Glostrup, Gothenburg and Jyväskylä. Int. J. Health Sciences 5: 119–128, 1994b.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Svanborg A.: Seventy-year-old people in Gothenburg. A population study in an industrialized Swedish city. II. General presentation of social and medical conditions. Acta Med. Scand. (Suppl. 611): 5–37, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schroll M., Jørgensen T., Ingerslev J.: The Glostrup Population Studies, 1964–1992. Dan. Med. Bull. 39: 204–207, 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Avlund K., Schultz-Larsen K., Kreiner S.: The measurement of instrumental ADL. Content validity and construct validity. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 5: 371–383, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schroll M., Steen B., Berg S., Heikkinen E., Viidik A.: NORA — Nordic Research on Ageing. Functional capacity of 75-year-old men and women in three Nordic localities. Dan. Med. Bull. 40: 618–624, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Radloff L.S.: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Measurement 1: 385–401, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hertzog C., Van Alstine J., Usala P.D., Hultsch D.F., Dixon R.: Measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in older populations. Psychological Assessment 2: 64–72, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Foelker G.A. Jr., Shewchuk R.M.: Somatic complaints and the CES-D. JAGS 40: 259–262, 1992.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roberts R.E., Rhoades H.M., Vernon S.W.: Using the CES-D Scale to screen for depression and anxiety: Effects of language and ethnic status. Psychiatry Res. 31: 69–83, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heikkinen R-L., Berg S., Avlund K.: Depressive symptomatology among the elderly in three Nordic localities as measured by the CES-D Scale. In: Heikkinen E., Berg S., Schroll M., Steen B., Viidik A. (Eds.), Fuctional status, health and aging: the NORA study. Series: Facts, Research and Intervention in Geriatric 1997. Serdi Publisher, Paris, 1997, pp. 107–119.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heikkinen E., Arajärvi R-L., Era P., Jylhä M., Kinnunen V., Leskinen A-L., Leskinen E., Mässeli E., Pohjolainen P., Rahkila P., Suominen H., Turpeinen P., Väisänen M., Österback L.: Functional capacity of men born in 1906–10, 1926–30 and 1946–50. A basic report. Scand. J. Soc. Med. (Suppl. 3): 1–93, 1984.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Era P., Heikkinen E.: Postural sway during standing and unexpected disturbance of balance in random samples of men of different ages. J. Gerontol. 40: 287–295, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wechsler D.: A standardized memory scale for clinical use. J. Psychol. 19: 87–95, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wechsler D.: Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS). Psychological Corporation, New York, 1955.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schaie K.W.: Schaie-Thurstone Adult Mental Abilities Test, Form OA. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, 1985.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Raven J.C.: Standard Progressive Matrices. Sets A, B, C, D and E. University Printing House, Cambridge, 1958.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Raven J.C., Court J.H., Raven J.: Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 3. Standard Progressive Matrices. H.K. Lewis, London, 1977.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liang J., Jay G.M.: Cross-cultural research on aging and health. In: Wallace R.B., Woolson R.F. (Eds.), The Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly. Oxford University Press, New York, 1992, pp. 301–312.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    SPSS-x User’s Guide, 1988.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D.: LISREL 6, Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables and Least Square Methods. University of Uppsala, Department of Statistics, Uppsala, 1986.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reuben D.B., Siu A.L., Kimpau S.: The predictive validity of self-report and performance-based measures of function and health. J. Gerontol. 47: M106–M110, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Reuben D.B., Valle L.A., Hays R.D., Siu A.L.: Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: a comparison of self-administered, interview-administered, and performance-based measures. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 43: 17–23, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jette A.: State of the art in functional status assessment. In: Rothstein J.M. (Ed.), Measurement in Physical Therapy. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1985, pp. 137–168.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Verbrugge L.M.: Recent, present, and future health of American adults. Ann. Rev. Public Health 10: 333–361, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Guralnik J.M., Ferrucci L., Simonsick E.M., Salive M.E., Wallace R.B.: Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N. Engl. J. Med. 332: 556–561, 1995.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seeman T.E., Charpentier P.A., Berkman L.F., Tinetti M.E., Guralnik J.M., Albert M., Blazer O., Rowe J.W.: Predicting changes in physical performance in a high-functioning elderly cohort: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. J. Gerontol. 49: M97–M108, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Williams M.: Why screen for functional ability in elderly persons? Ann. Intern. Med. 112: 639–640, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Salive M.E., Guralnik J., Glynn R.J.: Association of visual impairment with mobility and physical function. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 42: 287–292, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Laukkanen P., Kauppinen M., Era P., Heikkinen E.: Factors related to coping with physical and instrumental activities of daily living among people born in 1904–1923. Int. J. Geriatr. Psych. 8: 287–296, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Laukkanen
    • 1
  • E. Heikkinen
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. Schroll
    • 4
  • M. Kauppinen
    • 3
  1. 1.Health Center of the City of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  3. 3.Finnish Center for Interdisciplinary GerontologyUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  4. 4.The Glostrup Population Studies, Medical Department C, Glostrup County HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations