Abstract
Using U.S. Department of Education data, the current study examined changes in the rates of special education eligibility classifications. This was done to determine if classification substitution might be an explanation for increases in the number of students being found eligible for special education using the Autism criteria. Results reveal that as the rates of Autism have gone up, the rates of mental retardation (MR), emotional disturbance (ED), and specific learning disability (SLD) have gone down. From these data it was concluded that it is possible that the increased numbers of students found eligible for special education using Autism criteria, is at least in part a function of IEP teams being increasingly more willing and able to use autism criteria instead of MR, ED, and SLD criteria.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2001). Counseling families who choose complementary and alternative medicine for their child with chronic illness and disability. Pediatrics, 107, 598–601.
Barbaresi, W. J., Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., & Jacobsen, S. J. (2005). Incidence of autism in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–1997: Results from a population-based study. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159, 37–44.
Brock, S. E., Jimerson, S. R., & Hansen, R. L. (2006). Identifying, assessing, and treating autism at school. New York: Springer.
Chakrabarti, S., & Fombonne, E. (2001). Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children. JAMA, 285, 3093–3099.
Croen, L. A., Grether, J. K., Hoogstrate, J., & Selvin, S. (2002). The changing prevalence of autism in California. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 207–215.
Davila, R. R., Williams, M. L., & MacDonald, J. T. (1991, September 16). Joint policy memorandum (ADD). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Retrieved May 18, 2006, from http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/code_regs/OSEP_Memorandum_ADD_1991.html
Fombonne, E. (2003a). Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. Trends in Evidence-Based Neuropsychiatry, 5, 29–36.
Fombonne, E. (2003b). The prevalence of autism. JAMA, 289, 87–89.
Fombonne, E. (2003, September). Modern views of autism. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 503–505.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Dawson, M., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2005). Three reason not to believe in an autism epidemic. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 55–58.
Gillberg, C., & Wing, L. (1999). Autism: Not an extremely rare disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 99, 399–406.
Kohrt, B. (2004, Winter). School psychologists respond to ASD survey. CASP Today, 53(1), 4.
National Research Council, Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Powell, J. E., Edwards, A., Edwards, M., Pandit, B. S., Sungum-Paliwal, S. R., & Whitehouse, W. (2000). Changes in incidence of childhood autism and other autistic spectrum disorders from two areas of the West Midlands, UK. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 42, 624–628.
Report to the legislature on the principle findings from the epidemiology of Autism in California (2002, October 17). A comprehensive pilot study. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis, M.I.N.D. Institute.
Tidmarsh, L., & Volkmar, F. R. (2003). Diagnosis and empidemiology of autism spectrum disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 517–525.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2005). Annual report tables [Data file]. Available from IDEAdata.org Web site, retrieved May 17, 2006, http://www.ideadata.org/AnnualTables.asp
Yeargin-Allsopp, M., Rice, C., Karapukar, T., Doernberg, N., Boyle, C., & Murphy, C. (2003). Prevalence of autism in a US metropolitan area. JAMA, 289, 49–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author Note
The author wishes to thank Cathi Christo and Dorothy Marshall, both from California State University Sacramento, and Michael Slone, Irvine Unified School District; Irvine, CA, for their guidance regarding eligibility categories likely to be substituted for autism.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brock, S.E. An Examination of the Changing Rates of Autism in Special Education. Contemp School Psychol 11, 31–40 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341113
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341113