Advertisement

The California School Psychologist

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 31–40 | Cite as

An Examination of the Changing Rates of Autism in Special Education

  • Stephen E. Brock
Special Topic Article

Abstract

Using U.S. Department of Education data, the current study examined changes in the rates of special education eligibility classifications. This was done to determine if classification substitution might be an explanation for increases in the number of students being found eligible for special education using the Autism criteria. Results reveal that as the rates of Autism have gone up, the rates of mental retardation (MR), emotional disturbance (ED), and specific learning disability (SLD) have gone down. From these data it was concluded that it is possible that the increased numbers of students found eligible for special education using Autism criteria, is at least in part a function of IEP teams being increasingly more willing and able to use autism criteria instead of MR, ED, and SLD criteria.

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder Special Education Emotional Disturbance Specific Learn Disability California School Psychologist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2001). Counseling families who choose complementary and alternative medicine for their child with chronic illness and disability. Pediatrics, 107, 598–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbaresi, W. J., Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., & Jacobsen, S. J. (2005). Incidence of autism in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–1997: Results from a population-based study. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brock, S. E., Jimerson, S. R., & Hansen, R. L. (2006). Identifying, assessing, and treating autism at school. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Chakrabarti, S., & Fombonne, E. (2001). Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children. JAMA, 285, 3093–3099.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croen, L. A., Grether, J. K., Hoogstrate, J., & Selvin, S. (2002). The changing prevalence of autism in California. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 207–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davila, R. R., Williams, M. L., & MacDonald, J. T. (1991, September 16). Joint policy memorandum (ADD). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Retrieved May 18, 2006, from http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/code_regs/OSEP_Memorandum_ADD_1991.html Google Scholar
  7. Fombonne, E. (2003a). Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. Trends in Evidence-Based Neuropsychiatry, 5, 29–36.Google Scholar
  8. Fombonne, E. (2003b). The prevalence of autism. JAMA, 289, 87–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fombonne, E. (2003, September). Modern views of autism. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 503–505.Google Scholar
  10. Gernsbacher, M. A., Dawson, M., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2005). Three reason not to believe in an autism epidemic. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillberg, C., & Wing, L. (1999). Autism: Not an extremely rare disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 99, 399–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kohrt, B. (2004, Winter). School psychologists respond to ASD survey. CASP Today, 53(1), 4.Google Scholar
  13. National Research Council, Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Powell, J. E., Edwards, A., Edwards, M., Pandit, B. S., Sungum-Paliwal, S. R., & Whitehouse, W. (2000). Changes in incidence of childhood autism and other autistic spectrum disorders from two areas of the West Midlands, UK. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 42, 624–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Report to the legislature on the principle findings from the epidemiology of Autism in California (2002, October 17). A comprehensive pilot study. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis, M.I.N.D. Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Tidmarsh, L., & Volkmar, F. R. (2003). Diagnosis and empidemiology of autism spectrum disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 517–525.Google Scholar
  17. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2005). Annual report tables [Data file]. Available from IDEAdata.org Web site, retrieved May 17, 2006, http://www.ideadata.org/AnnualTables.asp
  18. Yeargin-Allsopp, M., Rice, C., Karapukar, T., Doernberg, N., Boyle, C., & Murphy, C. (2003). Prevalence of autism in a US metropolitan area. JAMA, 289, 49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© California Association of School Psychologists 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation and School Psychology; College of EducationCalifornia State University SacramentoSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations