Prevailing Interventions to Address Peer Victimization at school: A Study of California School Psychologists
- 41 Downloads
In an effort to understand how schools are coping with incidents of peer victimization, this study explored the types of related interventions currently being offered by public schools in Northern California. School psychologists’ perceptions of the importance of the available interventions were also examined (N = 96). The interventions reported to be the most widely available were a) whole-school no tolerance policies and b) school to home communication. Generally, the endorsed availability of interventions decreased as the intensity level of intervention increased. Interventions endorsed as most important were a) the whole-school no tolerance policy; b) general school climate interventions; c) school to home communication; and d) education of school personnel about bullying. Analyses examining the relative use of primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions revealed that school psychologists report primary intervention as most important for reducing levels of bullying at their schools. Analyses also revealed that the differences between psychologists’ ratings on each of the levels of the intervention hierarchy were significant. Implications for further scholarship and practice are discussed.
KeywordsSchool Climate Parent Training School Staff Behavioral Parent Training School Violence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brewster, C., & Railsback, J. (2001). Schoolwide prevention of bullying. Retrieved March 1, 2005 from: http://www.nwrel.org/request/dec01/.
- Bullying Prevention for School Safety and Crime Reduction Act, 828 CEC, §35294 (2003).Google Scholar
- Cohn, A. & Canter, A. (2002). Bullying: Facts for schools and parents. Retrieved on September 6, 2006 from: www.naspcenter.org/factsheets/bullying_fs.html
- Fried, S., & Fried, P. (1996). Bullies and victims: Helping your child survive in the schoolyard battlefield. New York: M. Evans.Google Scholar
- Gimpell, G.A., & Collett, B.R. (2002). Best Practices in Behavioral Parent Training. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.) Best Practices in Schoool Psychology IV (pp. 451–465). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Jimerson, S.R., & Furlong, M.J. (Eds) (2006). Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice. Mahwah, New Jersey. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Jimerson, S.R., Swearer, S.M., & Espelage, D.L. (Eds) (2009). The Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kasen, S., Berensen, K., Cohen, P., & Johnson, J.G. (2004). The effects of school climate on changes in aggressive and other behaviors related to bullying. In D. Espelange & S. Swearer (Eds.) Bullying in American Schools: A Social-Ecological Perspective on Prevention and Intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Larson, J., Smith, D.C., & Furlong, M.J. (2002). Best Practices in School Violence Prevention. In A. Thomas and J. Grimes (Eds.) Best Practices in School Psychology IV (pp 1081–1097). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Mayer, G.R., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (2002). Interventions for Vandalism and Aggression. In M.R. Shinn, H.M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.) Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 853–883). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- McNamara, K. (2002). Best Practices in Promotion of Social Competence in the Schools. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.) Best Practices in Schoool Psychology IV (911–927). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Metzler, C.W., Biglan, A., Rusby, J.C., & Sprague, J.R. (2001). Evaluation of a comprehensive behavior management program to improve school wide positive behavior support. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 448–479.Google Scholar
- Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Olweus, D., Limber, S., & Mihalic, S. F. (1999). Blueprints for violence prevention: Book nine. Bullying prevention program. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
- Peters, M.A. (2005). Knowledge and roles in the school violence agenda: A national survey of school psychologists. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 66, 570.Google Scholar
- Skiba, R. & Sprague, J. (2008). Safety without suspensions. Educational Leadership, September 2008, 38–43.Google Scholar
- Skiba, R., Reynolds, C.R., Graham, S., Sheras, P., Close-Conoley, J., Garcia-Vasquez, E. (2006). Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Smith, J.D., Schneider, B.H., Smith, P.K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 547–560.Google Scholar
- SPSS Inc. (2008). PASW Base 17.0 for Mac User’s Guide. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Il.Google Scholar