Viewing Response-to-Intervention through an Educational Change Paradigm: What Can We Learn?
Response-to-Intervention (RtI), a framework for improving academic and behavioral outcomes for all students, can be viewed as a current example of an educational change initiative. Given the difficulties that some schools may be experiencing when implementing RtI effectively, it is important to examine prior educational change conceptualizations and research for factors that may facilitate or impede current educational reform. The purpose of this article is to (a) present RtI as a current educational reform initiative, (b) use Fullan’s (2007) theoretical model as a framework through which to present information related to educational change, and (c) provide suggestions regarding how such educational change literature can inform and improve the implementation and future sustainability of RtI in schools.
KEYWORDSResponse to Intervention Educational Reform Educational Change Systemic Consultation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Batsche, G., Elliot, J., Graden, J.L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J.F., Prasse, D., Reschly, D.J., Schrag, J., & Tilly, W.D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.Google Scholar
- Berends, M., Bodilly, S., & Kirby, S. (2002). Facing the challenge of whole-school reform. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
- Danzberger, P., Carol, L., Cunningham, L., Kirst, M., McCloud, B., & Usdan, M. (1987). School boards: The forgotten players on the education team. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(1), 53–59.Google Scholar
- Datnow, A., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Working together for reliable school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(1 & 2), 183–204.Google Scholar
- Epstein, J. (1995). School/family/community partnerships. Phi Delta Kappan, 701–12.Google Scholar
- Fullan, M.G. (1994). Coordinating top-down and bottom-up strategies for educational reform. Systemic Reform: Perspectives on Personalizing Education. Retrieved August 11, 2008 from http://www.michaelfullan.ca/aRtIcles_90-99.htm.
- Fullan, M.G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.), New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Fullan, M.G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
- Graczyk, P.A., Domitrovich, C.E., Small, M., & Zins, J. (2006). Serving all children: An implementation model framework. School Psychology Review, 35, 266–274.Google Scholar
- Gresham, F.M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley & L. Danielson (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. (pp. 467–519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gresham, F.M. (2006). Evolution of the Response-to-Intervention concept: Empirical foundations and recent developments. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. (pp. 10–24). New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
- Gross, N., Giacquinta, J., & Bernstein, M. (1971). Implementing organizational innovations: A sociological analysis of planned educational change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Hall, G.E., & Hord, S.M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, & potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Horner, R.H., & Sugai, G., (2005). School-wide positive behavior support: An alternative approach to discipline in schools. (pp. 359–390). In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.) Positive Behavior Support. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K, & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds) (2007). Handbook of Response to Intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
- Knoff, H.M., & Batsche, G.M. (1995). Project ACHIEVE: Analyzing a school reform process for at-risk and underachieving students. School Psychology Review, 24(4), 579–603.Google Scholar
- McDermott, K.A. (2000). Barriers to large-scale success of models for urban school reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(1), 83–89.Google Scholar
- Rosenholz, S. (1989). Teacher’s workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Sarason, S. (1990). The predictable failure or educational reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Sarason, S. (1995). School change: The personal development of a point of view. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
- Vernez, G., Karam, R., Mariano, L.T., & DeMartini, C. (2006). Evaluating comprehensive school reform models at scale: Focus on implementation. Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2006/RAND_MG546.pdf
- Weiner, H.M. (2003). Effective inclusion: Professional development in the context of the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(6), 12–18.Google Scholar
- Yonezawa, S., & Datnow, A. (1999). Special strategies for educating disadvantaged students follow-up study: Examining the sustainability of research-based school reforms. Baltimore: John Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.Google Scholar