Advertisement

The California School Psychologist

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 5–17 | Cite as

Integrating Strength-Based Perspectives in Psychoeducational Evaluations

  • Sabrina Rhee
  • Michael J. Furlong
  • Joseph A. Turner
  • Itamar Harari
General Article

Abstract

Emerging from the risk and resilience literature is the recognition that a focus on psychopathology and deficit-based assessment has its limitations. Developing an understanding of a youth’s developmental needs and the creation of a suitable intervention strategy also requires knowledge of her or his life contexts and personal assets. This holistic and optimistic perspective, which seeks to enhance positive development in youth, has been referred to as “strength-based” assessment. Until recently, children’s social/interpersonal strengths have not been systematically examined and there have been few standardized measures specifically designed to assess strengths. This article discusses the importance of a strength-based perspective when assessing students. Principles will be emphasized by demonstrating the utility of two strength-based instruments: the Behavioral Emotional Rating Scale (BERS) and the California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) in school psychology research and practice.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Anthony, E. J. (1987). Risk, vulnerability, and resilience: An overview. In E. J. Anthony & B. Cohler (Eds.), The invulnerable child (pp. 3–48). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Benard, B. L. (1991). Fostering resilience in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, K. (1997). The anatomy of resilience. The Family Therapy Networker, 21, 22–31.Google Scholar
  6. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2001). Standards of quality and effectiveness for Pupil Personnel Services Credentials: School Counseling, School Psychology, School Social Work, Child Welfare and Attendance. Sacramento, Ca: Author. [Online]. Available: www.ctc.ca.gov/profserv/programstandards/pps/pps.pdf Google Scholar
  7. Calhoun, L. G., & Tadeschi, R. G. (1998). Beyond recovery from trauma: Implications for clinical practice and research. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caplan, G. (1964). Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Carver, C. S. (1998). Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cicchetti, D., & Garmezy, N. (1993). Prospects and promises in the study of resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, M. D. (1999). Strength-based practice: The ABC’s of working with adolescents who don’t want to work with you. [Online]. Available: www.drugs.indiana.edu/prevention/assets/asset2.html
  12. Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 494–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Constantine, N., Benard, B., & Diaz, M. (1999). Measuring protective factors and resilience traits in youth: The Healthy Kids Resilience assessment. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  14. Cowan, P., Cowan, C. P., & Schultz, M. (1996). Thinking about risk and resilience in families. In E. M. Hetherington & E. Blechman (Eds.), Stress, coping and resilience in children and families (pp. 155–172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L. (1995). Why we do what we do: The dynamics of personal autonomy. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  16. Doll, B., & Lyon, M. A. (1998). Risk and resilience: Implications for the delivery of educational and mental health services in schools. School Psychology Review, 27, 348–363.Google Scholar
  17. Egeland, B., Carlson, E., & Stroufe, L. A. (1993). Resilience as a process. Development & Psychopathology, 5, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Epstein, M. H. (1999). The development and validation of a scale to assess the emotional and behavioral strengths of children and adolescents. Remedial & Special Education, 20, 258–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Epstein, M. H., Dakan, E., Oswald, D., & Yoe, J. T. (2001). Using strength based data to evaluate children’s mental health programs. Unpublished manuscript, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
  20. Epstein, M. H., Harniss, M. K., Pearson, N., & Ryser, G. (1999). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Test-retest and inter-rater reliability. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. (1998). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  22. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 466–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman, K. A., Leone, P. E., & Friedman, P. (1999). Strength-based assessment of children with SED: Consistency of reporting by teachers and parents. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 8, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1993). Boys play sports and girls turn into others: Age, gender and ethnicity as determinants of coping. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 253–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Furlong, M. J., Casas, J. M., Woodbridge, M., Sosna, T., Zanglis, I., Pavelski, R., & Turner, J. (2000). Santa Barbara County Multiagency Integrated System of Care evaluation summary. [Online]. Available: www.education.ucsb.edu/∼sbmisc/pdf%20files/MISC-Final-10-04-00.pdf
  27. Garber, J. (1984). Classification of childhood psychopathology: A developmental perspective. Child Development, 55, 30–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garmezy, N. (1993). Children in poverty: Resilience despite risk. Psychiatry, 56, 127–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Garmezy, N., & Rutter, M. (Eds.). (1983). Stress, coping, and development in children. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gest, S., Neeman, J., Hubbard, J. J., Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (1993). Parenting quality, adversity, and conduct problems in adolescence: Testing process-oriented models of resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 663–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glantz, M. D., & Sloboda, Z. (1999). Analysis and reconceptualization of resilience. In M. D. Glantz & J. L. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations (pp. 109–126). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Goodman, R. (1999) The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 40, 791–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gore, S., & Eckenrode, J. (1994). Context and process in research on risk and resilience. In R. Haggerty, L. Sherrod, N. Garmezy, & M. Rutter (Eds.), Stress, risk, and resilience in children and adolescents: Processes, mechanisms, and interventions (pp. 19–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Haggerty, R. J., Sherrod, L., Garmezy, N., & Rutter, M. (Eds.). (1994). Stress, risk, and resilience in children and adolescents: Processes, mechanisms, and intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Harniss, M. K., Epstein, M. H., Ryser, G., & Pearson, N. (1999). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Convergent validity. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoyt, M. (1996). Constructive therapies Vol. 2. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, H. (1999). Toward an understanding of resilience: A critical review of definitions and models. In M. Glantz & J. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kelley, M. S. (1998). Ecological assessment: A study of school psychology assessment practices in Massachusetts. (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, AAM9815002.Google Scholar
  39. Kohn, P. M., & O’Brien, C. (1997). The situational response inventory: A measure of adaptive coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kretzman, J. P., & McNight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research.Google Scholar
  41. Lambert, N. M. (1964). The protection and promotion of mental health in schools. (Public Health Service Publication No. 1226. 4003342015). Washington DC: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  42. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lazarus, R. S., Averill, J. R., & Opton, E. M. (1974). The psychology of coping: Issues of research and assessment. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 249–315). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luthar, S., & Cushing, G. (1999). Measurement issues in the empirical study of resilience: An overview. In M. Glantz & J. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations (pp. 129–160). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lyons, J. S., Uziel-Miller, N. D., Reyes, F., & Sokol, P.T. (2000). Strengths of children and adolescents in residential settings: Prevalence and associations with psychopathology and discharge placement. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. MacDonald, G. B., & Validivieso, R. (2000). Measuring deficits and assets: How we track youth development now, and how we should track it. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development, Center for Youth Development and Policy Research.Google Scholar
  50. Maddi, S. R. (1997). Personal Views Survey II: A measure of dispositional hardiness. In C. P. Zalaquett, & R. J. Wood (Eds.). Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 293–309). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  51. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Masten, A. S., Best, K., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcame adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Masten, A., & Coatsworth, D. (1995). Competence, resilience, and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Volume 2: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 715–752). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Masten, A. S., & Curtis, W. J. (2000). Integrating competence and psychopathology: Pathways toward a comprehensive science of adaptation in development. Development & Psychopathology, 12, 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Masten, A. S., Hubbard, J. J., Gest, S. D., Tellegen, A., Garmezy, N., & Ramirez, M. (1999). Competence in the context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and maladaption from childhood to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 143–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller, G. E., Brehm, K., & Whitehouse, S. (1998). Reconceptualizing school-based prevention for antisocial behavior within a resilience framework. School Psychology Review, 27, 364–379.Google Scholar
  57. Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1997). Life Stressors and Social Resources Inventory: A measure of adults’ and youths’ life contexts. In C. P. Zalaquett & R. J. Wood (Eds.). Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 177–190). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  58. Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1993). Coping resources and processes: Current concepts and measures. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Morrison, G., Furlong, M., & Morrison, R. (2000). Beyond resilience: Building relationship to promote thriving. Reaching Today’s Youth: The Community of Circle Caring Journal, 5, 72–76.Google Scholar
  60. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  61. National Association of School Psychologists. (2000). Standard for training and field placement programs in school psychology: Standard for the credentialing of school psychologists. Bethesda, MD: Author. Retrieved April 9, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.naspweb.org/pdf/2000%20training%20&%20credentialing%20standards Google Scholar
  62. Nettles, S. M. (1991). Community involvement and disadvantaged students: A review. Review of Educational Research, 61, 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nettles, S. M., Mucherah, W., & Jones, D. S. (2000). Understanding resilience: The role of social resources. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nettles, S. M., & Pleck, J. H. (1994). Risk, resilience, and development: The multiple ecologies of Black adolescents in the United States. In R. J. Haggerty, N. Garmezy, M. Rutter, & L. Sherrod (Eds.), Stress, risk, and resilience in children and adolescents: Processes, mechanisms, and intervention (pp. 147–181). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. O’Leary, V. E. (1998). Strength in the face of adversity: Individual and social thriving. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oswald, D. P., Cohen, R., Best, A. M., & Lyons, J. S. (2001). The role of child strengths in the determination of level of care for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Unpublished manuscript, Virginia Commonwealth University.Google Scholar
  67. Parker, J. D., & Endler, N. S. (1992). Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. European Journal of Personality, 6, 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pennebaker, J. W., Mayne, T. J., & Francis, M. E. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 519–527.Google Scholar
  69. Pobanz, M., & Furlong, M. J. (2000). Using protective factors to enhance the prediction of negative short-term outcomes of first-time juvenile offenders. Paper presented at the meeting of the Teacher Educators of Children and Behavior Disorders, Pheonix, AZ.Google Scholar
  70. Quay, H. C. (1986). Classification. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.), Psychopathological disorders of childhood (3rd ed., pp. 1–34). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  71. Rapp, C. A. (1997). Preface. In D. Saleeby (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  72. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1992). Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.Google Scholar
  73. Robertson, L. M., Harding, M. S., & Morrison, G. M. (1998). A comparison of risk and resilience indicators among Latino/a students: Differences between students identified as at-risk, learning disabled, speech impaired and not at-risk. Education & Treatment of Children, 21, 333–353.Google Scholar
  74. Rutter, M. (1990). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In J. Rolf, A. S. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. H. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 181–214). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., MacKinnon, D., Ayers, T. S., & Roosa, M. W. (1997). Developing linkages between theory and intervention in stress and coping processes. In S. A. Wolchik & I. N. Sandler (Eds.), Handbook of children’s coping: Linking theory and intervention (pp. 3–40). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Recipricol effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smokowski, P. R., Reynolds, A. J., & Bezruczko, N. (1999). Resilience and protective factors in adolescence: An autobiographical perspective from disadvantaged youth. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., Bishop, M., Collins, C. A., Kirk, S. B., & Sworowski, L. A. (2000). Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 875–882.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., & Ellis, A. P. (1994). Coping through emotional approach: Problems of conceptualization and confounding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 350–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. U. S. Department of Education. (1994). National agenda for achieving better results for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  82. Walker, H. M., & McConnell, S. R. (1995). The Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment-Adolescent Version. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  83. Wang, M. C., & Gordon, E. W. (Eds.). (1994). Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  84. Wieck, A., Rapp, C., Sullivan, W. P., & Kisthardt, S. (1989). A strengths perspective for social work practice. Social Work, 34, 350–354.Google Scholar
  85. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Wiebe, D. J. (1991). Hardiness and stress moderation: A test of proposed mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 89–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© California Association of School Psychologists 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabrina Rhee
    • 1
  • Michael J. Furlong
    • 1
  • Joseph A. Turner
    • 1
  • Itamar Harari
    • 1
  1. 1.Gevirtz Graduate School of EducationUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations