Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 57–62 | Cite as

The Rationale for Continuous Casting of Finished Products

  • Francois R. Mollard
Process Metallurgy
  • 12 Downloads

Summary

An analysis is presented of the considerable effort that has been devoted to the development of methods for manufacturing small section finished products directly from molten metal. The most significant processes available for such small section continuous casting are examined to determine how well they fulfill the promises on which their development was initially justified. These processes include upward casting, the Taylor process, melt drag, melt extraction, melt spinning, and roll quenching.

It is shown that the major advantages of these processes are attributable to the corresponding high cooling rate, low capital cost, and flexibility of product form. Drawbacks of the processes include low productivity compared to conventional casting-working route with relatively poor control of product geometry. It is concluded that each process, without being universally applicable, can, however, be economically used for specific end products that cannot be obtained by conventional means.

Keywords

Continuous Casting Steel Fiber Reinforce Concrete Fiber Reinforce Concrete British Patent High Solidification Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Rantanen, “Upward Continuous Casting Technique in the Production of Non-Ferrous Wires,” Wire Journal, March 1980, pp. 102–104.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. F. Taylor, Physical Review, 23, (1924), p. 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. La W. King, “Method of Manufacturing Wire and the Like,” U.S. Patent 3,522,036, August 4, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. C. Hubert, F. R. Mollard and B. Lux, Zeitschrift fur Metallkunde, 64(12) (1973) pp. 835–843.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. M. Stewart, R. E. Maringer and C. E. Mobley, “Method of Producing Continuous Filaments Using a Rotating Heat-Extruding Member,” U.S. Patent 3,812,901, May 28, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. B. Pond, R. E. Maringer and C. E. Mobley, “High Rate Continuous Casting of Metallic Fibers and Filaments,” in New Trends in Materials Processing, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, (1974) pp. 128–164.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. N. Swamy and D. R. Lankard, “Some Practical Applications of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete,” Proc. Inst. Civil Engineers, Part I, Design & Construction, 56, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. B. Pond, “Metallic Filaments and Method of Making Same,” U.S. Patent 2,862,108, March 4, 1958.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. R. Bedell, “Extended Retention of Melt Spun Ribbon on Quenching Wheel,” U.S. Patent No. 3,862,658, January 28, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francois R. Mollard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations