Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 56–59 | Cite as

Review of Developments in Electrometallurgy 1982

  • Paul Duby
Annual Review of Extractive Metallurgy

Keywords

Current Efficiency Cryolite Metallurgical Society Aluminum Electrolysis Zinc Deposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V.A. Ettel and B.V. Tilak, “Electrolytic Refining and Winning of Metals,” Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry, Vol. 2, edited by J. O’M. Bockris, B.E. Conway, E. Yeager, and R.E. White, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1981, pp. 327–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.E. Haupin and W.B. Frank, “Electrometallurgy of Aluminum,” Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry, Vol. 2, edited by J. O’M. Bockris, B.E. Conway, E. Yeager, and R.E. White, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1981, pp. 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Jarrett, W.B. Frank, and R. Keller, “Advances in the Smelting of Aluminum,” Metallurgical Treatises, edited by J.K. Tien and J.F. Elliott, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 137–158.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N Jarrett, “Advances in the Smelting of Magnesium,” Metallurgical Treatises, edited by J.K. Tien and J.F. Elliott, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 159–170.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.W. Minkler and E.F. Baroch, “The Production of Titanium, Zirconium and Hafnium,” Metallurgical Treatises, edited by J.K. Tien and J.F. Elliott, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.S. Jacobi, “Electrolytic Processes in Hydrometallurgy,” Chem. Ind. (London) (1981), pp. 406–410.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    “Amarillo Copper Refining”, EM&J, 182(9) (1981), pp. 67–78.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Shirakawa, “Construction and Operation of the New Electrolytic Coffer Refinery at the Nikko Copper Works,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-47, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    I.J. Perry, J.C. Jenkins, and Y. Okamoto, “The Use of Permanent Stainless Steel Cathodes at Copper Refinery Pty. Ltd., Townsville,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; abstract in J. Metals, 32 (12) (1980), p. 27.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Tobback, R. Van Der Vorst, and J. Vieillefont, “Metallurgie-Hoboken-Overpelt Applies Automatic Stripping in Copper Tankhouse,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-45, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.M. Dompas, M. Govaerts, and K. Hens, “Update on Continuous Casting of Anodes with Integral Lugs,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-72, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. McCririck, “The Relative Merits of Periodic Current Reversal or Direct Current for New Copper Electro-Refining Tankhouses,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-66, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.H. Braun, “Energy Balances in the Electrorefining and Electrowinning of Copper,” J. Metals, 34(2) (1981), pp. 59–67.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.E. Somers, L. Kurylko, J.R. Stone, and M.L. Hughes, “Energy Use and Energy Conservation Opportunities in Copper Refining—A Case Study,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-17, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P.D. Parker, J.A. Bonucci, and J.E. Hoffmann, “Recovery of High-Purity Silver from Sulfated Copper Refinery Slimes,” Process and Fundamental Considerations of Selected Hydrometallurgical Systems, edited by M.C. Kuhn, SME-AIME, New York, 1981, pp. 177–184.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.P. Brown, R.O. Loufty, G.M. Cook, and Neng-Ping Yao, “The Electrorefining of Copper from a Cuprous Ion Complexing Electrolyte,” J. Metals, 33(7) (1981), pp. 49–57.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z.D. Stankovic, “Kinetic Parameters of Anodic Dissolution and Cathodic Deposition of Copper,” Erzmetall, 34(4) (1981), pp. 215–218.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.H. Glarum and J.H. Marshall, “An Admittance Study of the Copper Electrode,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981), pp. 968–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Carneval and J. Bebczuk de Cuminsky, “The Influence of the Anion on Copper Electrocrystallization,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981), pp. 1215–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.I. Ismail and T.Z. Fahidy, “Morphological Characteristics of Copper Deposition on Stainless Steel Cathodes,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D.L. Thomas, C.J. Krauss, and R.C. Kerby, “Betts Lead Electrorefining at Cominco,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-8, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Nomura, Y. Nokamura, T. Takahashi, and N. Veda, “Recent Lead Electrolytic Refining Practice at Miitsui’s Kanioka Lead Plant,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-7, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Tadao and K. Yoshiaki, “Operation of Lead Refining at Chigirishima Smelter,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-9, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Ohta, A. Ichinose, and T. Kohno, “Lead Electrolysis with High Current Density at Harima Works,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-21, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    “Asarco’s Corpus Christi Zinc Plant,” EM&J, 182(9) (1981), pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    “Mining in British Columbia—Cominco,” EM&J, 182(10) (1981), pp. 203–207.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Pophanken, “Automatic Material-Handling Systems and Stripping Machines in an Existing Electrolytic Zinc Plant,” Erzmetall, 34(7/8) (1981), pp. 387–391.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    I.A. Vishnyakov and E. Kh. Kanukov, “Improvement of the Control of Technological Parameters in the Hydrometallurgy of Zinc,” Tsvetn, Met. (7) (1981), pp. 31–33; Chem. Absts., 95 (6) (1981), 101015a.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    B. Verbaan and B. Mullinder, “The Simultaneous Electrowinning of Manganese Dioxide and Zinc from Purified Neutral Zinc Sulfate at High Current Efficiency,” Hydrometallurgy, 7 (1981), pp. 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Biegler and D.A. Swift, “Influence of Oxygen Reduction in the Electrowinning of Zinc,” Hydrometallurgy, 6 (1981), pp. 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    F.R. Foulkes, J.W. Smith, R. Kalia, and D.W. Kirk, “Effects of Cadmium Impurities on the Electrowinning of Zinc,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981), pp. 2307–2314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    W.W. Anderson, W.R. Opie, and H.P. Rajcevic, “Caustic Leach-Electrowin Zinc Process,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual, Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-52, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. Raychaudhuri and P.N. Saghai, “Recovery of Zinc from Galvanizers’ Ash,” Tech. Paper — Seminar on Zinc Wastes and Their Utilization,” Indian Lead Zinc Info. Center, New Delhi, India, 1980, pp. 2/51–2/57.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C.A. Basha et al., “Production of Zinc from Industrial By-product Zinc Compounds,” J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 118 (1981), pp. 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    E.M. Domic, “Lo Aguirre’s Challenge for Sealing up New Technology in Copper Hydrometallurgy: From Concept to Industrial Application,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-46, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    H.M. Brennecke, O. Bergmann, R.R. Ellefson, D.S. Davies, R.E. Lueders, and R.A. Spitz, “Nitric-Sulfuric Leach Process for the Recovery of Copper from Concentrates,” Mining Eng., 33(8) (1981), pp. 1259–1266.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    M.J. Kramer, P.F. Duby, and P.D. Parker, “Electrowinning of Lead from Complex Chloride Solutions,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    B.K. Thomas and D.J. Fray, “the Effect of Additives on the Morphology of Zinc Electrodeposited from a Zinc Chloride Electrolyte at High Current Densities,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 677–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    P.K. Sinha, G. Basu, S.C. Aush, N. Dhamanjayan, and V.A. Altekar, “Recovery of Nonferrous Metals and Elemental Sulfur by Ferric Chloride Leaching of Sulfide Concentrates,” Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 33(6) (1980), pp. 431–438.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Pedlik and L. Kubicek, “The Separation of Cobalt from Ammoniacal Nickel and Cobalt Solutions and the Treatment of Semiproduct to Electrolytic Cobalt,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-46, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tiang Hanying and Shu Yude, “The Electrochemical Behavior of Antimony during its Electrowinning in Na2S-NaOH Solution,” First China—USA Bilateral Metallurgical Conference, Beijing, China, November 1981, pp. 246–258.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    M.G. Chu, J. McBreen, and G. Adzic, “Substrate Effects on Zinc Deposition from Zincate Solutions. I Deposition on Cu, Au, Cd and Zn,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981), pp. 2281–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. McBreen, M.G. Chu, and G. Adzic, “Substrate Effects on Zinc Deposition from Zincate Solutions. II Deposition on Pb, Tl, Sn and In,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981), pp. 2287–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    K.I. Popov, M.D. Maksimovic, J.D. Trnjancev, and M.G. Pavlocic, “Dendritic Electrocrystallization and the Mechanism of Powder Formation in the Potenstiostatic Electrodeposition of Metals,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    R. Kammel and H.W. Lieber, “Electrolytic Recovery of Precious Metals from Dilute Solutions,” J. Metals, 33(10) (1981), pp. 45–48.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    J.P. Demaerel, J.P. Celis, and J.R. Roos, “FBE-Recovery of Metals from Plating Shop Wastewater Solutions,” Vortr.-Galvanotech. Kelloq., 6th (1980), pp. 31–36.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. Tomlinson and D. Brown, “Electrolytic Recovery of Metals from Wash Waters of Electroplating Installations,” Galvanotecnica, 32(4) (1981), pp. 73–75.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    R.P. Tison, “Copper Recovery Using a Tumbled-Bed Electrochemical Reactor,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981), pp. 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M. Dubrovsky and J.W. Evans, “Fluidized-Bed Electrowinning of Cobalt,” Process and Fundamental Considerations of Selected Hydrometallurgical Systems, edited by M.C. Kuhn, SME-AIME, New York, 981, pp. 353–357.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    J.W. Evans, and M. Dubrovsky, “The Use of a Fluidized Bed Cathode for Selective Deposition of Metals from Aqueous Solutions,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; abstract in J. Metals, 32 (12) (1980), p. 10.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    M.J. Cusik, L.O. Aguirre, and G.P. Martins, “Some Insights into the Fluidized Bed Electrowinning of Zinc Sulfate Solutions by Computer Simulation,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; abstract in J. Metals, 32 (12) (1980), p. 28.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    F. Goodridge, K. Lister, and K. Scott, “Metal Deposition in Diaphragmless Fluidized-Bed Electrolytic Cells,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 723–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    D.P. Ziegler, M. Dubrovsky and J.W. Evans, “A Preliminary Investigation of Some Anodes for Use in Fluidized-Bed Electrodeposition of Metals,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 625–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    K. Scott, “Metal Recovery Using a Moving-Bed Electrode,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    P.K. Ng, “Mass Transfer in a Porous Trielectrode Reactor under Steady-State and Recirculating Conditions,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981), pp. 792–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    N.V. Machnyr and V.K. Varentsor, “Electrolysis of Eluate Produced by Autoclave Desorption of Metalcyanide Ions from Activated Carbon,” Izv. Sil. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim. Nauk (1981) (2), pp. 139–144; Chem. Abstr., 95 (3), 46810d.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    G. Kreysa, “Normalized Space Velocity—A New Figure of Merit for Waste Water Electrolysis Cells,” Clectrochimica Acta 26 (1981), pp. 1693–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    A.P. Doroshkevich, S.V. Karelov, I.F. Khudyakov, A.E. Sokolov, and B.I. Korobitsyn, “Electrochemical Treatment of Bimetallic Wastes,” Tsvetn. Met. (1981) (6), pp. 45–48; Chem. Abstr., 95 (5), 84153z.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    K. Hein, F. Terrazas, and D. Schab, “Electrolytic Production of Fragmental Nickel by High Current Densities,” Erzmetall, 34(9) (1981), pp. 460–464.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    G.R. Smith, W.R. Thompson, and P.E. Richardson, “Electrowinning Nickel from Dilute Solutions Using High Mass Transport Conditions,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; abstract in J. Metals, 32 (12) (1980), p. 10.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    A. Stork and D. Hutin, “Improvement of Copper Recovery in Electrochemical Reactors Using Turbulence Promoters,” Electrochimica Acta, 26 (1981), pp. 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    A. Stork and D. Hutin, “Mass Transfer and Pressure Drop Performance of Turbulence Promoters in Electrochemical Cells,” Electrochimica Acta, 26 (1981), pp. 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    G.H. Sedahmed and L.W. Shcmilt, “Mass Transfer Characteristics of a Novel Gas-Evolving Electrochemical Reactor,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    L.J.J. Janssen and S.J.D. van Stralen, “Bubble Behavior on and Mass Transfer to an Oxygen-Evolving Transparent Nickel Electrode in Alkaline Solution,” Electrochimica Acta, 26 (1981), pp. 1011–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    H. Vogt, “A Hydrodynamic Model for the Ohmic Interelectrode Resistance of Cells with Vertical Gas Evolving Electrodes,” Electrochimica Acta, 26 (1981), pp. 1311–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    F.A. Baczek, B.C. Wojcik, D.M. Lewis, and R.C. Emmett, “The Electroslurry Process for Copper Recovery from Smelter and Refinery Wastes,” Process and Fundamental Considerations of Selected Hydrometallurgical Systems, edited by M.C. Kuhn, SME-AIME, New York, 1981, pp. 125–141.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    F. Baczek, R.C. Emmett, Jr., and D.A. Dahlstrom, “Flexibility of the Electro-Slurry Process for Handling ACC Copper Concentrates and Smelter Dust,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; abstract in J. Metals, 32 (12) (1980), p. 42.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    A.E. Torma and O.T. Inal, “A Contribution to Direct Electrolytic Processing of Copper and Lead Sulfide Concentrates,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; abstract in J. Metals, 32 (12) (1980), p. 42.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    R. Bertram, E. Hillrichs, N. Galitis, R. Mueller, and H. Greulich, “Electrochemical Leaching of Sulfide Ores,” Dev. Miner. Process. 1979 (Pub. 1981), pp. 810–824.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    D.C. Price and J.P. Chilton, “The Anodic Reactions of Bornite in Sulfuric Acid Solution,” Hydrometallurgy, 7 (1981), pp. 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    M. Ammou-Chokroum, P. K. Sen. and F. Fouques, “Electrooxidation of Chalcopyrite in Acid Chloride Medium: Kinetics, Stoichiometry and Reaction Mechanism.” Dev. Miner. Process. 1979 (Pub. 1981), pp. 759–809.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    E. Ghali, C. Meric, and D. Deroo, “Electrodissolution of Heazlewoodite in Hydrochloric Acid Solution,” (in French) J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    R.K. Paramguru, S.C. Sircar, and S.K. Bose, “Direct Electrowinning of Lead from Galena Concentrate Anodes,” Hydrometallurgy, 7 (1981), pp. 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    D.C. Price, “Application of Chronopotentiometric Analysis to the Anodic Treatment of Copper Sulfides,” Met. Trans. B, 12B (1981), pp. 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    R. Bertram and H. Greulich, “On the Anodic Leaching of Chalcopyrite in a Sulfuric Acid Medium. II. Potentiostatic Research in Suspension Cells,” Erzmetall, 34(4) (1981), pp. 181–185.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    A.S. Russell, “Pitfalls and Pleasures in New Aluminum Process Development,” Met. Trans. B, 12B (1981), pp. 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    A.S. Russell, “Developments in Aluminum Smelting,” Aluminum (Duesseldorf) 57(6) (1981), pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    B.J. Welch, “Advances in Aluminum Smelter Technology,” CEA, Chem. Eng. Aust., 5(4) (1981), pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    K. Grjotheim and B. Welch, “Impact of Alternative Processes for Aluminum Production on Energy Requirement,” J. Metals, 34(9) (1981), pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    J.B. Todd, “Energy Reduction in Hall-Heroult Cells with Conventional and Special Electrodes,” J. Metals, 33(9) (1981), pp. 42–45.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    O. Knacke, “Thermochemical Energy Balance of an Aluminum Electrolysis,” Erzmetall, 34(9) (1981), pp. 460–464.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    E.B. Tarapore, “The Effect of Some Operating Variables in Flow in Aluminum Reduction-Cells,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 341–355.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Arita Yoji and Ikeuchi, I., “Numerical Calculation of Bath and Metal Convection Pattern and their Interface Profile in Al Reduction Cells,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 357–371.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    J.W. Evans, Y. Zundelevich, and D. Sharma, “A Mathematical Model for Prediction of Currents, Magnetic Fields, Melt Velocities, Melt Topography and Current Efficiency in Hall-Héroult Cells,” Met. Trans. B, 12B (1981), pp. 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    J. A. Stagg, “Reduction Cell Collector Bars-Interaction with Operating Environment on Cell Operation,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 397–406.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    P. Aeselbach and H. Friedl, “Improved Pot Life and Energy Savings by a New Cathode Lining Technique,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 389–396.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    P. Varin, “Mathematical Model to Determine Ohmic Drops in a Prebaked Anode Assembly,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 313–324.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    V.V. Burnakin, L.P. Arskaya, V.I. Zalivnoi, P.V. Polyakov, and V.F. Ofitserov, “Use of High-Sulfur Cokes for the Production of an Anode Mass,” Tsvetn. Met., (6) (1981), pp. 68–70; Chem. Abstr., 95 (10) (1981), 173166y.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    A.R. Bolduc, “Automated Alumina Feeding H.S.,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981; TMS Paper Selection A81-71, The Metallurgical Sciety of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    A.R. Johnson, “Alumina Crusting and Dissolution in Molten Electrolyte,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 373–387.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    D.C. Lynch and M.K. Han, “Influence of Al2O3 on the Reoxidation of Aluminum in Molten Cryolite,” Met. Trans. B, 12B (1981), pp. 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    J. Thonstad and Ye-Xiang Liu, “The Effect of a Layer of Alumina at the Electrolyte/Aluminum Interface,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 303–312.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    S. Rolseth and J. Thonstad, “On the Mechanism of the Reoxidation Reaction in Aluminum Electrolysis,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 289–301.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    D. Bratland, J.J. del Campo, K. Cho, K. Grjotheim, and J. Thonstad, “Current Efficiency Measurements in Laboratory Aluminum Cells. Influence of Bath Volume, Anode Size and Anode Quality,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 281–288.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    J.J. del Campo, J.P. Millet and M. Rolin, “Alumina Electrolysis in Cryolite Melt—Investigation of the Mechanism of Cathodic Reaction by Means of a Rotating Disk Electrode,” Electrochimica Acta, 26 (1981), pp. 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    J.J. Duruz, G. Stehle, and D. Landolt, “On the Role of the Electrode Material During Cathodic Deposition of Na and Al from Molten Fluorides,” Electrochemica Acta, 26 (1981), pp. 771–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    D. Damianacos, Fl. Lantelme, and M. Chemla, “Analysis of Gases and Mechanisms of Anodic Reactions in Cryolite-Alumina Metals,” Electrochemica Acta, 26 (1981), pp. 917–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    A. Bjørgum, A. Sterten, V.B. Sprensen, J. Thonstad, and R. Tunold, “Emf Measurements in the NaCl-AlCl3 System—I. Activity of AlCl3 in Basic Melts at Temperature Close to the Liquidus Line,” Electrochimica Acta, 26 (1981). pp. 487–490: “II. The Thermodynamics of Liquid-Gaseous Equilibria in the Basic Range of the System.” ibid.. pp. 491–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    R.A. Carpio, L.A. King, A.P. Ratrik, T. Østrold, and H.A. Øye, “Solution of Chlorine in Chloroaluminate Melts,” Light Metals 1981, edited by G.M. Bell, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981, pp. 325–338.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Zhoo Wuwei, “Cone Bipolar Electrolysis,” (in Chinese), Nonferrous Metals (Beijing) 33(3) (1981), pp. 71–77.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Peng RuiWu, “Some Investigations of the Electrochemistry and Thermodynamics of Molten Salts,” First China-USA, Bilateral Metallurgical Conference, Beijing, China, November 1977, pp. 108–120.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    S.D. Hill, D.L. Pool, and G.A. Smyres, “Electrowinning Zinc from Zinc Chloride in Monopolar and Bipolar Fused-Salt Cells,” Rep. Invest. -U.S. Bur. Mines, (1981), RI8524.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    F. Basile, E. Chassaing, and G. Lorthioir, “Electrochemical Reduction of ZrCl4, in Molten NaCl, CsCl and KCl-LiCl and Chemical Reactions Coupled to the Electrodeposition of Zirconium,” J. Appl. Electrochem., 11 (1981), pp. 645–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    P.L. Vijay, J.C. Sehra, and C.V. Sundaran, “Fused Salt Electrolytic Process for Reclamation of Zirconium and Titanium Scrap,” paper presented at the 110th AIME Annual Meeting, Chicago, February 1981, abstract in J. Metals, 32 (12) (1980), p. 87.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    V.I. Konstantinov, E.G. Polyakov, and P.T. Stangrit, “Cathodic Processes at Electrolysis of Chloride-Fluoride and Oxyfluoride Melts of Niobium,” Electrochimica Acta, 26 (1981), pp. 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    V. Cohen, “High Rate Electrodeposition of Niobium from Molten Fluorides Using Periodic Reversal Steps and the Effects on Grain Size,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981), pp. 731–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    G. Zwilling, “High Purity Gadolinium by Electrorefining in Fused Sales — I.” Molten Salt Properties and Deposition Mode in LiF-GdF3 and LiCl-LiF-GdF3 Electrolytes,” Electrochimica Acta, 26 (1981) pp, 637–642; “II. Electrocrystallization in the LiF-BaF2-GdF3 Mixture, Ibid., pp. 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    M.G. Pitt and D.J. Fray, “Refining of Indium by Use of a Solid Electrolyte Membrane,” Trans. Instn. Min. Metall., C90 (1981), pp. C84–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Duby
    • 1
  1. 1.Henry Krumb School of MinesColumbia UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations