Impact of control structures on assimilative capacity of rivers and fish habitat



This research studies the impact of water level control structures on self-assimilative capacity of rivers and on fish habitat. Constructing a water level control structure in a river reach will alter its hydraulics as well as its water quality, thermal regime and fish habitat. A mathematical model is developed to simulate river hydraulics, water quality, temperature and fish habitat. Diurnal dissolved oxygen concentrations are investigated to show their impact on fish. A case of a Nile River reach was studied to investigate the impact of the existence of the Esna barrage on the water quality and fish in its upstream reach. The barrage has negative impacts on the upstream self-assimilative capacity of the rivers. The waste load that the river could absorb was only 54 % (at low flow) and 78 % (at high flow) of the entire load if no barrage was present. Including in the simulation of the effects of photosynthesis and respiration, the above mentioned percentages were raised to 54 % and 91 %, respectively. Although water level control structures have negative impacts on the upstream self-assimilative capacity of the rivers, they have positive effect on downstream dissolved oxygen concentrations due to reaeration that happens across them. Downstream dissolved oxygen concentration increased by 6 % from its upstream concentration value. The barrage has a positive effect on fish habitat in the upstream section. The weighted usable area of Tilapia fish is doubled in case of barrage existence. The barrage causes a slight decrease in water temperature that reaches an average of 0.13 degree in the month of June.


Self-assimilative capacity hydraulic structure mathematical modeling dissolved oxygen concentrations photosynthesis and respiration thermal regime and water temperature 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdelbary, M., (1992). River regime of the Nile river, Arab Republic of Egypt. Ministry of Public Works and Water Resources, Water Research Center, Nile Research Institute, Canadian International Development Agency.Google Scholar
  2. ADEM, (2001). The ADEM spreadsheet water quality model. Alabama Department of Environmental Management, Water Division-Water Quality Branch.Google Scholar
  3. Barbie, D. L.; Gandara, S. C., (1999). Water resources data Texas. U.S Geological Survey-water data, ReportTx-99-4, 4.Google Scholar
  4. Chapra, S., (1997). Surface water quality modeling. McGraw-Hill International, 265–268.Google Scholar
  5. Chou, W., (1988). Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill publishing company.Google Scholar
  6. Eid, D. M., (1992). Impact of flow control structures on rivers self purification capacity. Dissertation. The American University in Cairo.Google Scholar
  7. El Baradei, S. A., (2005). Impact of control structure on ecosystem and assimilative capacity of rivers. Dissertation. Cairo University: Faculty of Engineering.Google Scholar
  8. EPA, (2003). Environmental Protection Agency, Computer package: QUAL2E, EPA.Google Scholar
  9. French, R. H., (1985). Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 164–182.Google Scholar
  10. Goldsmith, E.; Hildyard, N., (1986). The social and environmental effects of large dams. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  11. Group work, (1997). Sacramento river temperature modeling project. Center for Environmental and Water Resources Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Modeling Group. University of California, Davis Report No. 97–01.Google Scholar
  12. Habitat modeling, (2002). Available from:
  13. Hepher, B., (1981). Commercial fish farming. John Willy and Sons, Inc. Idaho, (2004). Idaho’s Water Quality Standards, State of Idaho, Department of Environmental Quality. Available from:
  14. Imam, E., El Baradei, S., (2006). Ecosystem and assimilative capacity of rivers with control structure. 8thconference on modelling, measuring and prediction of water pollution. September 4, Italy. DOI: 10.2495/WP060431.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs, A. F. G., (1994). Diurnal temperature variation in shallow water pool. Department of Meteorology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Duivendaal 2, NL-6701 AP Wageningen.Google Scholar
  16. John, R. D., (1984). Water temperature change caused by abstraction. J. Hydraul. Eng., 110(7), 987–991 (5 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCully, P., (2001). Silenced rivers, the ecology and politics of large dams. New York. Zed Books.Google Scholar
  18. McDonnell, A. J.; Wright, R. M., (1979). In-stream deoxygenation rate prediction. J. Environ. Eng., Div-ASCE, 105(2), 323–335 (13 pages).Google Scholar
  19. Moffat, A. I. B.; Nalluri, C.; Novak, P., (1990). Hydraulic structures. Cambridge University press, 271–289.Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, S., (1987). Diurnal variations of water quality parameters in boulder Creek. City of Boulder/USGS water quality monitoring.Google Scholar
  21. Neumann, D. W., (2003). Regression model for daily maximum stream temperature. J. Environ. Eng., 129(7), 667–674 (8 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pilgrim, J. M.; Xing, F.; Stefan, H. G., (1998). Stream temperature correlations with air temperatures in Minnesota: Implications for climate warming. Water Resour. Bull., 34(5), 1109–1121 (13 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shanahan, P., (1984). Water temperature modeling: A practical guide. Proceedings of Stormwater and Water Quality Model Users Group meeting.Google Scholar
  24. Sinokrot, B. A.; Heinz, S. G., (1994). Stream water-temperature sensitivity to weather and bed parameters. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCI, 120(6), 722–736 (15 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song, C. C. S.; Pabst, A. F.; Bowers, C. E., (1973). Stochastic analysis of air and water temperatures., J. Env. Eng., 99(6), 785–800 (16 pages).Google Scholar
  26. Song, C. C. S.; Chien, C. Y., (1977). Stochastic properties of daily temperature in rivers. J. Env. Eng., 103(2), 217–231 (15 pages).Google Scholar
  27. Stefan, H. G.; Preud’homme, E. B., (1993). Stream temperature estimation from air temperature. Water Resour. Bull., 29(1), 27–47 (21 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomann, R. V.; Mueller, J. A., (1987). Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. Harper Collins, 231, 599–621.Google Scholar
  29. Wright, S. A.; Holly, F. M. Jr.; Krajewski, W.; Bradley, A. A., (1999). Long-Term Simulation of Thermal Regime of Missouri River. J. Hydraul. Eng., 125(3), 242–252 (11 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Construction Engineering DepartmentAmerican UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations