Kinetic analysis of enhanced biological phosphorus removal in a hybrid integrated fixed film activated sludge process



Hybrid integrated fixed film activated sludge is a promising process for the enhancement of nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal in conventional activated sludge systems that can be used for upgrading biological nutrient removal, particularly when they have space limitations or need modifications that will require large monetary expenses. In this research, successful implementation of hybrid integrated fixed film activated sludge process at temperate zone wastewater treatment facilities has been studied by the placement of fixed film media into aerobic, anaerobic and anoxic zones. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the incorporation of enhanced biological phosphorus removal into hybrid integrated fixed film activated sludge systems and study the interactions between the fixed biomass and the mixed liquor suspended solids with respect to substrate competition and nutrient removal efficiencies. A pilot-scale anaerobic-anoxic-oxic configuration system was used. The system was operated at different mean cell residence times and influent chemical oxygen demand/total phosphorus ratios and with split influent flows. The experimental results confirmed that enhanced biological phosphorus removal could be incorporated successfully into hybrid integrated fixed film activated sludge system, but the redistribution of biomass resulting from the integration of fixed film media and the competition of organic substrate between enhanced biological phosphorus removal and denitrification would affect performances. Also, kinetic analysis of the reactor with regarding to phosphorus removal has been studied with different kinetic models and consequently the modified Stover-Kincannon kinetic model has been chosen for modeling studies and experimental data analysis of the hybrid integrated fixed film activated sludge reactor.


Nutrient removal biomass cell biofilm reactors mean cell residence time stover kincannon model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. APHA; AWWA; WEF, (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th. (ed.) Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Flora, J. R. V.; Suidan, M. T.; Biswas, P.; Sayles, G. D., (1995). A modeling study of anaerobic biofilm systems: Detailed biofilm modeling., Biotech. Bioeng., 46(1), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Garzon Zuniga, M.; Gonzalez Martinez, A., (1996). Biological phosphate and nitrogen removal in a bioûlm sequencing batch reactor., Water Sci. Tech., 34(1-2), 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harrcmoes, P., (1976). The significance of pore diffusion to filter denitrification., J. Water Pollut. Con. F., 48(2), 377–388.Google Scholar
  5. Helness, H.; Ødegaard, H., (1999). Biological phosphorus removal in a sequencing batch moving bed bioûlm reactor., Water Sci. Tech., 40(4–5), 161–168.Google Scholar
  6. Henze, M.; Iarremoes, P., (1983). Anaerobic treatment of wastewater in fixed film reactors., Lit. Rev. water Sci. Tech., 15(8–9), 1–101.Google Scholar
  7. Hobson, P. N., (1983). The kinetics of anaerobic digestion of farm wastes., J. Chem. Tech. Biotech., 33B, 1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Kincannon, D. F.; Stover, E. L., (1982). Design methodology for fixed film reaction-RBCs and biological towers. Civil Engineering for Practicing and Design Engineers, 2(3), 107–124. Pergamon Press. New York.Google Scholar
  9. Jensen, K. R., (1995). Effects of integrated fixed film activated sludge on nitrogen removal in biological nutrient removal systems. M S Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.Google Scholar
  10. Lindgren, M., (1983). Mathematical modeling of the anaerobic filter process., Water Sci. Tech., 15(8-9), 197–208.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, H., (1996). Utilization of captor sponges to maintain nitrification and denitrification in BNR-activated sludge at low aerobic MCRTs., MS Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,VA 24061.Google Scholar
  12. Mamais, D.; Jenkins, D., (1992). The effects of MCRT and temperature on enhanced biological phosphorus removal., Water Sci. Tech., 26(5-6), 955–965.Google Scholar
  13. McCarty, P. L.; Mosey, F. E., (1991). Modeling of anaerobic digestion processes(a discussion of concepts)., Water Sci. Tech., 24(8), 17–33.Google Scholar
  14. McClintock, S.; Randall, C. W.; Pattarkine, V., (1991). The effects of temperature and mean cell residence time on enhanced biological phosphorus removal., Proceedings, Specialty Conference on Environmental Engineering, ASCE, J. Environ. Eng., 319–324.Google Scholar
  15. Mitta, P. R., (1994). Utilization of ûxed ûlm media in BNR activated sludge. MS Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.Google Scholar
  16. Randall, C. W.; Sen, D., (1996). Full-scale evaluation of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) process for enhanced nitrogen removal., Water Sci. Tech., 33(12), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rozzi, A.; Verstraete, W., (1981). Calculation of active biomass and sludge production vs waste composition in anaerobic contact process., Tribol. Cebedeau, 34(455), 421–427.Google Scholar
  18. Sen, D., (1995). COD removal, nitrification, and denitrification kinetics and mathematical modeling of an integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) system. Ph.D thesis, Dept. Civil Environ. Eng., Virginia Tech., Blacksburg, VA 24061.Google Scholar
  19. Sen, D.; Mitta, P.; Randall, C. W., (1994). Performance of ixed film media integrated in the activated sludge reactors to enhance nitrogen removal., Water Sci. Tech., 30(11), 13–24.Google Scholar
  20. Shieh, W. K., (1982). Mass transfer in a rotating biological contactor., Water Res., 16(4), 1971–1974.Google Scholar
  21. Song, K. H.; Young, J. C., (1986). Media design factors for fixed bed filters., J. Water Pollut. Con. Fed., 58(2), 115–121.Google Scholar
  22. Srivastava, R. C., (1995). Kinetics of fresh water hyacinth digestion in semi-continuous operation., Chem. Eng. J. B., 56(3), 100–121.Google Scholar
  23. Sriwiriyarata, T.; Randall, C. W., (2005). Performance of IFAS wastewater treatment processes for biological phosphorus removal., J. Water Res., 39(16), 3873–3884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stover, E. L.; Kincannon, D. I., (1982). Rotating biological contactor scale-up and design., Proc. of the 1st. International Conference on fixed film Biological Processes, 1–21 Kings Island. Ohio.Google Scholar
  25. Suidan, M. T.; Wang, Y. T., (1985). Unified analysis of biofilm kinetics., J. Environ. Eng., 111(5), 634–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tay, J. H.; Show, K. Y.; Jeyaseelan, S., (1996). Effects of media characteristics on performance of upflow anaerobic packed-bed reactors., J. Environ. Eng., 122(6), 469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tilche, A.; Vieiga, S. M. M., (1991). Discussion report on reactor design of anaerobic filters and sludge bed reactors. Water Sci. Tech., 24(8), 193–206.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, F., (1993). Prediction of rotating biological contactor efficiency using TOC., J. Environ. Eng., 119(3), 478–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilson, F.; Hamoda, M. F.; Islam, H.; Buranasiin, P., (1988). The treatment of high strength vegetable pickling wasteGoogle Scholar
  30. using the RBC process., Enviro. Tech. Lett., 9(11), 1201–1212.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, F.; Lee, W. M., (1995). Rotating biological contactor for wastewater treatment in an equatorial climate., Water Sci. Tech., 35(8), 177–184.Google Scholar
  32. Yang, B. C.; Jahan, K.; Young, J. C., (1987).Modeling of anaerobic filter performance. Proc. of 8th International Conferenc on alternative Energy Sources, 214–220, Miami Beach. FL, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of EnvironmentTehran UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations