Abstract
When a new wastewater treatment plant is being designed by computer simulation, detailed data about organic fractions of influent wastewater (measured as chemical oxygen demand) are usually not available, but knowledge of the typical ranges of these fractions is indispensable. The influent chemical oxygen demand fractions can substantially influence the results of simulation-based design such as reactor volumes, solids residence time, effluent quality, oxygen demand, sludge production, etc. This article attempts to give an overview of wastewater organic fractions as modeling parameters and presents new chemical oxygen demand fractionation results from Hungary. According to the data from literature, the ratio of chemical oxygen demand components in raw wastewater is very different and the average composition is as follows: Inert particulate =17.1 %, slowly biodegradable = 57.9 %, inert soluble = 7.8 % and readily biodegradable = 17.5 %. The Hungarian wastewater samples were analyzed according to STOWA (Dutch foundation for applied water research) protocol and the obtained results were not much different from those of literature ( inert particulate = 23.7 %, slowly biodegradable = 49.8 %, inert soluble = 4.6 % and readily biodegradable = 21.9 %), but some typical characteristics were observed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brdjanovic, D.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Versteeg, P.; Hooijmans, C. M; Alaerts, G. J.; Heijnen, J. J., (2000). Modeling COD, N and P removal in a full-scale WWTP Haarlem Waarderpolder., Water Res., 34(3), 846–858.
Carucci, A.; Rolle, E.; Smurra, P., (1999). Management optimization of a large wastewater treatment plant., Water Sci. Tech. 39(4), 129–136.
Chachaut, B; Roche, N.; Latifi, R., (2005). Long-term aeration strategies for small-size alternating activated sludge treatment plants., Chem. Eng. Prog., 44(5), 591–604.
Del la Sota, A.; Larrea, L.; Novak, L.; Grau, P.; Henze, M., (1994). Performance and model calibration of R-D-N processes in pilot plant, Water Sci. Tech. 30(6), 355–364.
Ekama, G A.; Dold, P. L.; Marais, G V. R., (1986). Procedures for determining influent COD fractions and the maximum specific growth rate of heterotrophs in activated sludge systems., Water Sci. Tech., 18(6), 91–114.
Enviro Sim Assiocates Ltd., (2005). BioWin 2.1. simulator — default parameters.
Funamizu, N.; Yamamoto, S.; Kitagawa, Y.; Takakuwa, T., (1997). Simulation of the operational conditions of the full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant to improve the performance of nutrient removal., Water Sci. Tech. 36(12), 9–18.
Gernaey, K. Y; Jorgensen, S. B., (2004). Benchmarking combined biological phosphorous and nitrogen removal wastewater treatment plant processes., Cont. Eng. Pract. 12(3), 357–373.
Henze, M., (1992). Characterization of wastewater for modelling of activated sludge processes., Water Sci. Tech., 25(6), 1–5.
Henze, M.; Grady, C. P. L.; Gujer, W.; Marais, G V. R.; Matsuo, T., (1987). Activated sludge model No. 1. IAWPRC Scientific and Technical Report 3. London: IAWPRC.
Henze, M.; Gujer, W.; Mino, T.; Matsuo, T.; Wentzel, M. C; Marais, G. V. R., (1995). Activated sludge model No. 2. IAWQ Scientific and Technical Report No. 3., London: IAWQ.
Henze, M.; Gujer, W.; Mino, T.; Matsuo, T.; Wentzel, M. C; Marais, G V. R.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., (1999). Activated sludge model No. 2d., Water Sci. Tech. 39(1) 165–182.
Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., van Loosdrecht, M., (2000). Activated sludge model No. 3. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2D and ASM3, in: Henze M.; Gujer, W.; Mino, T.; Van Loosdrecht, M., (Eds.). IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 9. London: IWA.
Hydromantis Ltd., (2007). GPS-X 5.0 software. General Purpose Simulator — default parameters.
Kappeler, J.; Gujer W., (1992). Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modelling., Water Sci. Tech. 25(6), 125–139.
Lesouef, A.; Payraudeau M.; Rogalla, F.; Kleiber, B., (1992). Optimizing nitrogen removal reactor configuration by onsite calibration of the IAWQ activated sludge model., Water Sci. Tech., 25(6), 105–123.
Lie, E.; Welander, T., (1997). A method for determination of the readily fermentable organic fraction in municipal wastewater., Water Res., 31(6), 1269–1274.
Makinia, J.; Rosenwinkel, K. H.; Spering, V., (2005). Long-term simulation of the activated sludge process at the Hanover-Grümmerward pilot WWTP, Water Res., 39(8), 1489–1502.
Mamais, D.; Jenkins, D.; Pitt, P., (1993). A rapid physico-cemical method for the determination of readily biodegradable soluble COD in municipal wastewater, Water Res., 27(1), 195–197.
Marquot, A; Strieker, A. E.; Racault, Y., (2006). ASM1 dynamic calibration and long term-validation for an intermittently aerated WWTP, Water Sci. Tech. 53(12), 247–256.
Melcer, H.; Dold, P. L.; Jones, R. M.; Bye, C. M.; Takacs, I.; Stensel, H. D.; Wilson, A. W.; Sun, P.; Bury, S., (2003). Methods for wastewater characterisation in activated sludge modelling. Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Alexandria, VA, USA.
Rieger, L.; Koch, G; Khiini, M.; Gujer, W.; Siegrist, H., (2001). The EAWAG BIO-P module for activated sludge model No. 3., Water Res., 35(16), 3887–3903.
Roeleveld, P. J.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., (2002). Experience with guidelines for wastewater characterisation in The Netherlands., Water Sci. Tech., 45(6), 77–87.
Satoh, H.; Okuda, E.; Mino, T.; Matsuo, T., (2000). Calibration of kinetic parameters in the IAWQ activated sludge model: a pilot scale experience., Water Sci. Tech., 42(3–4), 29–34.
Sin, G; Van Hulle, S. W. H.; Dirk, J. W.; Pauw, D.; Van Griensven, A.; Vanrollleghem, P. A., (2005). A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: A SWOT analysis., Water Res., 39(12) 2459–2474.
Sollfrank, U., (1988). Bedeutung organischer Fraktionen in kommunalem Abwasser im Himblick auf die mathematische modellierung von belebtschlammsystemen. Dissertation der ETH, Zürich, Schweiz, No. 8765.
Spanjers, H.; Vanrolleghem, P, (1995). Respirometry as tool for rapid characterization of wastewater and activated sludge., Water Sci. Tech., 31(2), 105–114.
Vanrolleghem, P. A.; Insel, G; Petersen, B.; Sin, G; De Pauw, D.; Nopens, I.; Weijers, S.; Gearnaey, K., (2003). A comprehensive model calibration procedure for activated sludge models. In Proceedings: WEFTEC 76th. Annual Conference and Exhibition, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vanveldhuizen, H. M.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Heijnen, J. J., (1999). Modelling Biological Phosphorous and nitrogen removal in a full scale activated sludge process., Water Res. 33(16), 3459–3468.
Wichern, M.; Lübken, M.; Blömer, R.; Rosenwinkel, K. H., (2003). Efficiency of the activated sludge model No. 3 for German wastewater on six different WWTPs.,, 47(11), 211–218.
Wichern, M.; Obenaus, F.; Wulf, P.; Rosenwinkel, K. H., (2001). Modelling of full-scale wastewater treatment plants with different treatment processes using the activated sludge model No. 3., Water Sci. Tech., 44(1), 49–56.
Xu, S.; Hultman, B., (1996). Experiences in wastewater characterization and model calibration for the activated sludge process., Water Sci. Tech., 33(12), 89–98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pasztor, I., Thury, P. & Pulai, J. Chemical oxygen demand fractions of municipal wastewater for modeling of wastewater treatment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 6, 51–56 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326059
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326059