Advertisement

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 51–59 | Cite as

Predicting falls in residential care by a risk assessment tool, staff judgement, and history of falls

  • Lillemor Lundin-Olsson
  • Jane Jensen
  • Lars Nyberg
  • Yngve Gustafson
Original Article

Abstract

Background and aims: It is of great importance to consider whether a tool’s predictive value is generalizable to similar samples in other locations. Numerous fall prediction systems have been developed, but very few are evaluated over a different time period in a different location. The purpose of this study was to validate the predictive accuracy of the Mobility Interaction Fall (MIF) chart, and to compare it to staff judgement of fall risk and history of falls. Methods: The MIF chart, staff judgement, and fall history were used to classify the risk of falling in 208 residents (mean age 83.2±6.8 years) living in four residential care facilities in northern Sweden. The MIF chart includes an observation of the ability to walk and simultaneously interact with a person or an object, a vision test, and a concentration rating. Staff rated each resident’s risk as high or low and reported the resident’s history of falls during the past 6 months. Falls were followed up for 6 months. Results: During the follow-up period, 104 residents (50%) fell at least once indoors. Many of the factors commonly associated with falls did not differ significantly between residents who fell at least once and residents who did not fall. In this validating sample the predictive accuracy of the MIF chart was notably lower than in the developmental sample. A combination of any two of the MIF chart, staff judgement, and history of falls was more accurate than any approach alone; more than half of the residents classified as ‘high risk’ by two approaches sustained a fall within 3 months. Conclusions: Residents classified as ‘high risk’ by any two of the MIF chart, staff judgement, and history of falls should be regarded as particularly prone to falling and in urgent need of preventive measures.

Key Words

Elderly fall risk prediction falls Mobility Interaction Fall chart residential care 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Luukinen H, Koski K, Hiltunen L, Kivelä S-L. Incidence rate of falls in an aged population in Northern Finland. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 843–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butler M, Norton R, Lee-Joe T, Cheng A, Campbell AJ. The risks of hip fracture in older people from private homes and institutions. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 381–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robbins AS, Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Schulman BL, Osterwiel D, Fine G. Predictors of falls among elderly people. Results of two population-based studies. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1628–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lipsitz LA, Jonsson PV, Kelley MM, Koestner JS. Causes and correlates of recurrent falls in ambulatory frail elderly. J Gerontol 1991; 46: M114–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tinetti ME, Doucette J, Claus E, Marottoli R. Risk factors for serious injury during falls by older persons in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 1214–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tinetti ME, Doucette JT, Claus EB. The contribution of predisposing and situational risk factors to serious fall injuries. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 1207–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luukinen H, Koski K, Laippala P, Kivela SL. Predictors for recurrent falls among the home-dwelling elderly. Scand J Prim Health Care 1995; 13: 294–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luukinen H, Koski K, Laippala P, Kivela SL. Risk factors for recurrent falls in the elderly in long-term institutional care. Public Health 1995; 109: 57–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graafmans WC, Ooms ME, Hofstee HMA, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM, Lips P. Falls in the elderly: A prospective study of risk factors and risk profiles. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 1129–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thapa PB, Brockman KG, Gideon P, Fought RL, Ray WA. Injurious falls in nonambulatory nursing home residents: a comparative study of circumstances, incidence, and risk factors. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 273–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiely DK, Kiel DP, Burrows AB, Lipsitz LA. Identifying nursing home residents at risk for falling. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 551–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tinetti ME, Williams TF, Mayewski R. Fall risk index for elderly patients based on a number of chronic disabilities. Am J Med 1986; 80: 429–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morse JM, Morse RM, Tylko SJ. Development of a scale to identify the fall-prone patient. Can J Aging 1989; 8: 366–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmid NA. 1989 Federal Nursing Service Award Winner. Reducing patient falls: a research-based comprehensive fall prevention program. Mil Med 1990; 155: 202–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heslin K, Towers J, Leckie C, et al. Managing falls: Identifying population-specific factors and prevention strategies. In Funk SG, Tornquiest EM, Champagne MT, Weise RA, Eds. Key aspects of elder care: Managing falls, incontinence, and cognitive impairment. New York: Springer Pub. Co, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Downton JH. Falls in the elderly. London: Edward Arnold. 1993.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Studenski S, Duncan PW, Chandler J, et al. Predicting falls: The role of mobility and nonphysical factors. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 297–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hendrich A, Nyhuis A, Kippenbrock T, Soja ME. Hospital falls: development of a predictive model for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res 1995; 8: 129–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    MacAvoy S, Skinner T, Hines M. Fall risk assessment tool. Appl Nurs Res 1996; 9: 213–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Fall prediction index for patients in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1997; 28: 716–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oliver D, Britton M, Seed P, Martin FC, Hopper AH. Development and evaluation of evidence based risk assessment tool (STRATIFY) to predict which elderly inpatients will fall: case-control and cohort studies. BMJ 1997; 315: 1049–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. The Mobility Interaction Fall Chart. Physiother Res Int 2000; 5: 184–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 2000; 19: 453–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Myers AH, Baker SP, Van Natta ML, Abbey H, Robinson EG. Risk factors associated with falls and injuries among elderly institutionalized persons. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 1179–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moore T, Martin J, Stonehouse J. Predicting falls: Risk assessment tool versus clinical judgement. Perspectives 1996; 20: 8–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of the patient for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. “Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet 1997; 349: 617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Attention, frailty, and falls: the effect of a manual task on basic mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 758–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mahoney H, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 1965; 14: 61–5.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? Intern Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 64–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Norusis MJ. SPSS advanced statistics 6.1. United States of America: SPSS Inc., 1994.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morse JM, Black C, Oberle K, Donahue P. A prospective study to identify the fall-prone patient. Soc Sci Med 1989; 28: 81–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nyberg L. Gustafson Y. Using the Downton Index to predict those prone to falls in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1996; 27: 1821–4.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rutledge DN, Donaldson NE, Pravikoff DS. Fall risk assessment and prevention in healthcare facilities. The Online Journal of Clinical Innovations 1998; 1: 1–33.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wyatt JC, Altman D. Prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten? BMJ 1995; 311: 1539–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lillemor Lundin-Olsson
    • 1
  • Jane Jensen
    • 1
  • Lars Nyberg
    • 1
  • Yngve Gustafson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy and Geriatric MedicineUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations