Impact factor of medical journals: Problems in geriatrics
- 30 Downloads
The Impact Factor (IF) is one of the most reliable methods for evaluating the quality of scientific journals. To date, no one has studied the IF of geriatric journals over time. Our aims were 1) to evaluate the IF trend of geriatric journals in general, and with respect to internal medicine, which is the nearest discipline, and 2) to assess the proportion of papers on common geriatric topics published in geriatric journals, with respect to other general periodicals. The current literature was studied to define what IF is and describe its good points and deficiencies. We then analyzed the situation regarding geriatric journals. A bibliometric analysis addressed the kind of journal interested in important geriatric themes (syncope, falls, hip fractures, delirium). Geriatric journals have a low IF, but their importance has been growing over the years. Despite this, papers regarding geriatric themes are published mainly in non-specific journals, and the number of publications regarding syncope, falls, hip fractures, and delirium has not increased during the period in question. In conclusion, it is difficult to use the IF for comparisons between different disciplines, in particular when the one under consideration (geriatrics and gerontology) is spread over a wide range of medical fields. The increase in IF of geriatric journals over time is the most important result of our analysis; this finding will encourage geriatric scientists to submit their papers to geriatric periodicals and will increase the specificity of the gerontological discipline.
KeywordsGerontological and geriatrics journals impact factor journal citation journal evaluation medical journals
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Institute for Scientific Information: Journal of Citation Report: Impact Factor. http://jcrweb.com.Google Scholar
- 2.Garfield E.: Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation throughout association of ideas. Science 122: 108–111, 1955.Google Scholar
- 3.Garfield E., Sher I.H.: New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature throughout citation indexing. American Documentation 14: 195–201, 1963.Google Scholar
- 4.Garfield E.: Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178: 471–479, 1972.Google Scholar
- 5.Garfield E.: Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ 161: 979–980, 1999.Google Scholar
- 6.Seglen P.O.: Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314: 498–502, 1997.Google Scholar
- 9.Mussi C., Palazzi C., Pasqualini R., Foroni M.: L’Impact Factor delle riviste geriatriche. Giorn. Geront. 49: 205–206, 2001 (in Italian).Google Scholar
- 10.Moher D., Fortin P., Jadad A.R., Juni P., Klassen T., Le-Lorier T., Liberati A., Linde K., Penna A.: Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet 347: 363–366, 1996.Google Scholar
- 11.Lidor R., Miller U., Rotstein A.: Is research on aging and physical activity really increasing? A bibliometric analysis. J. Aging Phys. Activity 7: 182–195, 1999.Google Scholar
- 12.Baker D.R.: On-line bibliometric analysis for researchers and educators. J. Soc. Work Educ. 27: 41–42, 1991.Google Scholar
- 13.Bass S.A., Ferraro K.F.: Gerontology education in transition: considering disciplinary and paradigmatic evolution. Gerontologist 40: 97–106, 2000.Google Scholar
- 15.Publist.com http://Publist.com, the Internet Directory of Publications: Ulrich’s International Periodicals Directory. http://www.publist.com.