Abstract
The Impact Factor (IF) is one of the most reliable methods for evaluating the quality of scientific journals. To date, no one has studied the IF of geriatric journals over time. Our aims were 1) to evaluate the IF trend of geriatric journals in general, and with respect to internal medicine, which is the nearest discipline, and 2) to assess the proportion of papers on common geriatric topics published in geriatric journals, with respect to other general periodicals. The current literature was studied to define what IF is and describe its good points and deficiencies. We then analyzed the situation regarding geriatric journals. A bibliometric analysis addressed the kind of journal interested in important geriatric themes (syncope, falls, hip fractures, delirium). Geriatric journals have a low IF, but their importance has been growing over the years. Despite this, papers regarding geriatric themes are published mainly in non-specific journals, and the number of publications regarding syncope, falls, hip fractures, and delirium has not increased during the period in question. In conclusion, it is difficult to use the IF for comparisons between different disciplines, in particular when the one under consideration (geriatrics and gerontology) is spread over a wide range of medical fields. The increase in IF of geriatric journals over time is the most important result of our analysis; this finding will encourage geriatric scientists to submit their papers to geriatric periodicals and will increase the specificity of the gerontological discipline.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Institute for Scientific Information: Journal of Citation Report: Impact Factor. http://jcrweb.com.
Garfield E.: Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation throughout association of ideas. Science 122: 108–111, 1955.
Garfield E., Sher I.H.: New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature throughout citation indexing. American Documentation 14: 195–201, 1963.
Garfield E.: Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178: 471–479, 1972.
Garfield E.: Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ 161: 979–980, 1999.
Seglen P.O.: Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314: 498–502, 1997.
Opthof T.: Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovasc. Res. 33: 3–7, 1997.
Ray J., Berkwits M., Davidoff F.: The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal. Am. J. Med. 109: 131–135, 2000.
Mussi C., Palazzi C., Pasqualini R., Foroni M.: L’Impact Factor delle riviste geriatriche. Giorn. Geront. 49: 205–206, 2001 (in Italian).
Moher D., Fortin P., Jadad A.R., Juni P., Klassen T., Le-Lorier T., Liberati A., Linde K., Penna A.: Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet 347: 363–366, 1996.
Lidor R., Miller U., Rotstein A.: Is research on aging and physical activity really increasing? A bibliometric analysis. J. Aging Phys. Activity 7: 182–195, 1999.
Baker D.R.: On-line bibliometric analysis for researchers and educators. J. Soc. Work Educ. 27: 41–42, 1991.
Bass S.A., Ferraro K.F.: Gerontology education in transition: considering disciplinary and paradigmatic evolution. Gerontologist 40: 97–106, 2000.
Leipzig R.M., Sullivant J.A., Soriano R.P.: That was the year that was: an evidence-based clinical geriatric update 1998–1999. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 48: 1717–1725, 2000.
Publist.com http://Publist.com, the Internet Directory of Publications: Ulrich’s International Periodicals Directory. http://www.publist.com.
Burton J.R., Solomon D.H.: Geriatric medicine: a true primary care discipline. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 41: 459–462, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A synthesis of this article has recently been published by the Giornale di Gerontologia (Giorn. Geront. 49: 205–206, 2001).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mussi, C., Palazzi, C., Pasqualini, R. et al. Impact factor of medical journals: Problems in geriatrics. Aging Clin Exp Res 14, 64–68 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324420
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324420