Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 392–397 | Cite as

A physical fitness model of older adults

  • H. Nagasaki
  • H. Itoh
  • T. Furuna
Original Articles


Physical fitness for young people is viewed as a multidimensional construct, in that it consists of specific components such as strength, mobility, balance, flexibility, and stamina. This study examined whether this structure underlying physical fitness is also relevant to older adults. A 10- item performance test, which was assumed to assess six components of physical fitness, was administered to 69 healthy volunteers ranging in age from 61 to 83 years. A covariance structure model was applied to the test data: the second- order factor was Physical Fitness, and the first- order factors were Strength, Walking, Balance, Flexibility, Stamina, and Manual Speed which were assumed to be measured based on the ten observed variables. Goodness- of- fit index (GFI) of the model was acceptable (GFI=0.93). While four factors relating to basic motor performances (Strength, Walking, Balance, and Manual Speed) had loadings more than 0.62 to Physical Fitness, Flexibility and Stamina had less than 0.35. It was suggested for elderly people that strength, mobility, balance, and speed components of physical fitness were highly correlated and explainable by a single factor, while flexibility and cardiorespiratory endurance were to be measured by use of specific measures.


motor ability physical fitness performance test 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Falls H.B.: Modem concepts of physical fitness. JOPER 51: 25–27, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canadian standardized test of fitness. Fitness Canada, Ottawa. 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Briggs R.C., Gossman M.R., Drews J.E., Shaddeau S.A.: Balance performance among noninstitutionalized elderly women. Phys. Therapy 70: 410–415, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tinetti M.E., Ginter S.F.: Identifying mobility dysfunctions in elderly patients. Standard neuromuscular examination or direct assessment? JAMA 259: 1190–1193, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carter J.S., Williams H.G., Macera C.A.: Relationships between physical activity habits and functional neuromuscular capacities in healthy older adults. J. Appl. Gerontol. 12: 283–293, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greene L.S., Williams H.G., Macera C.A.: Identifying dimensions of physical (motor) functional capacity in healthy older adults. J. Aging Health 5:163–178, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Era P.: Sensory, psychomotor and motor functions in men of different ages. Scand. J. Social Med. 39: 9–77, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fleishman E.A., Quaintance M.K.: Taxonomies of human performance. Academic Press, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fleishman E.A.: The structure and measurement of physical fitness. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parker J.F., Fleishman E.A.: Ability factors and component performance measures as predictors of complex tracking behavior. Psychol. Monograph. 74 (Whole No. 503), 1960.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagasaki H., Itoh H., Furuna T.: The structure underlying physical performance measures for older adults in the community. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. (in press), 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kinugasa T., Nagasaki H., Itoh H., Hashizume K., Furuna T., Maruyama H.: Aging effect on motor ability for male subjects aged from 18 to 83 years (in Japanese). Jpn. J. Phys. Fitness Sports Med. 43: 343–351, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagasaki H., Itoh H., Hashizume K., Furuna T., Maruyama H., Kinugasa T.: Walking patterns and finger festination in the elderly. Exp. Aging Res. (in press), 1995.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Furuna T., Nagasaki H., Itoh H., Fujisawa A., Niimi M., Maruyama H., Kinugasa T.: Effect of aging on the aerobic capacity measured by a step-test (in Japanese). Jpn. J. Geriatr. 31:40–47, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nagasaki H., Itoh H., Maruyama H., Hashizume K.: Characteristic difficulty in rhythmic movement with aging and its relation to Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Aging Res. 14: 171–176, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagenaar R.C., Beek W.J.: Hemiplegic gait: A kinematic analysis using walking speed as a basis. J Biomech. 25: 1007–1015, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Avlund K., Schroll M., Davidsen M., Lovborg B., Rantanen T.: Maximal isometric strength and functional ability in daily activities among 75-year-old men and women. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 4: 32–40, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Long J.S.: Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to LISREL. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1983.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blair S.N.: Physical activity, physical fitness, and health. Res. Quart. Exer. Sport 64: 365–376, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Nagasaki
    • 1
  • H. Itoh
    • 1
  • T. Furuna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyTokyo Metropolitan Institute of GerontologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations