Abstract
Colonoscopy (CS) is currently considered the best diagnostic procedure for colonic imaging. The objectives of this multicentric study were to assess whether CS or simple contrast barium enema (SCBE) has the best effectiveness and tolerance in the elderly (over 80 years old). Except in cases of emergency, 67 elderly patients from 3 centers were randomized among three diagnostic strategies: CS, SCBE or barium enema + rectosigmoidoscopy (BERS). CSs were generally carried out after polyethylene- glycol (PEG) cleansing, and barium enemas after enema cleansing.
The diagnostic effectiveness of the three strategies was not significantly different: a colonic abnormality was found in CS, SCBE, BERS groups in 65, 56 and 71% of the cases, respectively. No other investigation was needed in 61 to 76% of cases, and, on the basis of the exploration, final therapy was modified in less than 22% of cases. Overall cleansing quality was significantly better with barium enema (84.1%) than with CS (57.0% p<0.05). This was explained by a poor tolerance to PEG intake, which led to 28.2% of adverse effects, compared with 7.1% after enema preparation (p<0.05). This resulted in a significantly higher failure rate of complete colonic exploration with CS (48%) than with barium enema (9%; p<0.001). In conclusion, the effectiveness of the three diagnostic strategies is similar in the elderly. However, due to a better acceptance of the enema preparation, and to a better success rate of complete exploration, SCBE should be preferred to investigate colonic symptoms when the above preparations are used. (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 7: 190–194, 1995)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Williams C.B., Macrae F.A., Bartram C.I.: A prospective study of diagnostic methods in adenoma follow-up. Endoscopy 14: 74–78, 1982.
Howard O.M., Buchanan J.D., Hunt R.H.: Angiodysplasia of the colon. Experience of 26 cases. Lancet 2: 16–19, 1982.
Höchter W., Weingart J., Kühner W., Frimberger E., Ottenjann R.: Angiodysplasia in the colon and rectum. Endoscopic morphology, localisation and frequency. Endoscopy 17: 182–185, 1985.
O’Brien M.J., Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Gottlieb L., Sternberg S., Diaz B., Dickersin G., Ewing S., Geller S., Kasimian D., Komorowski R., Saporn A.: The National Polyp Study Group: Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 98: 371–379, 1990.
Brunetaud J.M., Mosquet L., Houcke M., Scopelliti J., Rance F., Cortot A., Paris J.C.: Villous adenomas of the rectum. Results of endoscopic treatment with Argon and Nd:YAG lasers. Gastroenterology 89: 832–837, 1985.
Rex D.K., Weddle R.A., Lehman G.A., Pound D., O’Connor K., Hawes R., Dittus R., Lappas J., Lumeng L.: Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 98: 855–861, 1990.
Parks T.G.: Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon. Clin. Gastroenterol. 4: 53–69, 1975.
Ministère de la solidarité, de la santé et de la protection: Personnes âgées: environnement, santé, revenus. Cahiers statistiques, Solidarité santé. La documentation française, Paris, 1989.
Jaramillo E., Slezak P.: Comparison between double-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy to investigate lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest. Radiol. 17: 81–83, 1992.
Norfleet R.G., Ryan M.E., Wyman J.B., Rhodes R., Nunez J., Kirchner J., Parent K.: Barium enema versus colonoscopy for patients with polyps found during flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 35: 531–534, 1991.
Ott D.J., Scharling E.S., Chen Y.M., Wu W.C., Gelfand D.W.: Barium enema examination: sensitivity in detecting colonic polyps and carcinomas. Southern Med. J. 82: 197–200, 1989.
Irvine E.J., O’Connor J., Frost R.A., Shorvon P., Somers S., Stevenson G., Hunt R.: Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy us colonoscopy in rectal bleeding: barium enema vs colonoscopy in rectal bleeding. Gut 29: 1188–1193, 1988.
Wegener M., Borsch G., Schaffstein J., Luth I., Rickeis R., Ricken D.: Effect of aging on the gastrointestinal transit of a lactulose supplemented mixed solid-liquid meals in human. Digestion 39: 40–46, 1988.
Di Palma J.A., Brady III C.E., Pierson W.P.: Colon cleansing: acceptance by older patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 81: 652–655, 1986.
Bour B., Blanqui A., Halphen M., Lemann M.: Préparation à la coloscopie du sujet âgé. Résultats obtenus avec 4 litres d’une solution de PEG et impact de l’aromatisation. Med. Chir. Dig. 21: 335–338, 1992.
Waye J.D., Bashkoff E.: Total colonoscopy: is it always possible? Gastrointest. Endosc. 37: 152–154, 1991.
Grasset D., Roucou C., Syzeirol L., Seigneurie C.: Intérêt et tolerance de la coloscopie chez le sujet de plus de 80 ans. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 16: A110, 1992.
Chatrenet P., Friocourt P., Ramain J.P., Cherrier M., Maillard J.B.: Colonoscopy in the elderly: a study of 200 cases. Eur. J. Med. 2:411–413, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burtin, P., Bour, B., Charlois, T. et al. Colonic investigations in the elderly: Colonoscopy or barium enema?. Aging Clin Exp Res 7, 190–194 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324334
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324334