Advertisement

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 151–157 | Cite as

Comparison of spouse and nonkin controls: The experience of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD)

  • D. S. Smith
  • Gerda G. Fillenbaum
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Normal spouses may be an excellent source of control subjects in research on noninstitutionalized Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cases. To determine to what extent spouses might differ from nonkin controls, we compared information on 145 spouses of AD patients with 158 nonkin community volunteers enrolled by 23 centers of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease. Chi square and 1-way ANOVA analyses indicate that neither at entry nor over the next two years did the two groups of controls differ significantly on demographic characteristics, health status, or performance on neuropsy-chological measures. However, hierarchical logistic regression showed that, after controlling for demographic characteristics and physical status, dropout was nearly twice as high among spouse controls. Dropout was related to nonreturn of the AD case. Thus, as controls, spouses are viable as long as the cases to whom they are married remain in the study. (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 6: 151–157, 1994)

Keywords

Alzheimer’s disease community controls control subjects spouse controls 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kaye J.M., Lawton P., Kaye D.: Attitudes of elderly people about clinical research on aging. Gerontologist 30: 100–106, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lachman R., Lachman J.L., Taylor D.W.: Reallocation of mental resources over the productive mespan. in: Craik F.I.M., Trehub S. (Eds.), Advances in the study Of Communication and Affect. Vol 8: Aging and Cognitive Processes. Plenum Press, New York, 1982, pp. 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zimmer A.W., Calkins E., Hadley E., Ostfeld A.M., Kaye J.M., Kaye D.: Conducting clinical research in geriatric populations. Ann. Intern. Med. 103: 276–283, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howard K.I., Krause M.S., Orlinsky D.E.: The attrition dilemma: Toward a new strategy for psychotherapy research. J. Consul. Clin. Psychol. 54: 106–110, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffman P., Marron K.R., Fillit H., Libow L.S.: Obtaining informed consent in a teaching nursing home. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 31: 565–569, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leader M.A., Neuwirth E.: Clinical research and the noninstitutional elderly: A model for subject recruitment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 26: 27–31, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lipsitz D.A., Pluchino F.C., Wright S.M.: Biomedical research in the nursing home: Methodological issues and subject recruitment results. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 35: 629–634, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Given B.J., Keilman L.J., Collins L., Given C.W.: Strategies to minimize attrition in longitudinal studies. Nursing Res. 39: 184–186, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morris J.C., Heyman A., Mohs R.C., Hughes J.P., van Belle G., Fillenbaum G., Mellits E.D., Clark C., and the CERAD investigators: The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 39: 1159–1165, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hughes C.P., Berg L., Danziger W., Coben L.A., Martin R.L.: A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br. J. Psychiatry 140: 566–572, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Folstein M., Folstein S., McHugh P.: Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12: 189–198, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koch G.G., Landis J.R., Freeman J.L., Freeman D.H., Lehnen R.G.: A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurement of categorical data. Biometrics 33: 133–158, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mehta C.R., Patel N.R.: A network algorithm for performing Fisher’s exact test in r × c contingency tables. J. Am. Statistical Assoc. 78: 427–434, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. S. Smith
    • 1
  • Gerda G. Fillenbaum
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Urologic SurgeryWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Aging and Human DevelopmentDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations