Skip to main content
Log in

Deep Resonant GPS-Dynamics Due to the Geopotential

  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On time scales of interest for mission planning of GNSS satellites, the qualitative motion of the semimajor axis and the node evolves primarily from resonances with the Earth’s gravitational field. The relevant dynamics of GPS orbits, which are in deep 2 to 1 resonance, is modeled with an integrable intermediary that depends only on one angle, the stroboscopic mean node, plus a two degrees of freedom perturbation that is factored by the eccentricity. Results are compared with long-term runs of the GTDS DSST showing very good agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ROSSI, A. “Resonant dynamics of Medium Earth Orbits: Space Debris Issues,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 100, No. 4, 2008, pp. 267–286.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. ANSELMO, L. and PARDINI, C., “Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of High Area-to-Mass Ratio Debris Released into High Earth Orbits,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 67, 2010, pp. 204–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ANSELMO, L. and PARDINI, C. “Dynamical Evolution of High Area-to-Mass Ratio Debris Released into GPS Orbits,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 1491–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ELY, T.A. and HOWELL, K.C. “Long Term Evolution of Artificial Satellite Orbits due to Resonant Tesseral Harmonics,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Vol. 44, 1996, pp. 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ELY, T.A. and HOWELL, K.C. “Dynamics of Artificial Satellite Orbits with Tesseral Resonances Including the Effects of Luni-Solar Perturbations,” International Journal of Dynamics and Stability of Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1997, pp. 243–269.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. ELY, T.A. and HOWELL, K.C. “East-West Stationkeeping of Satellite Orbits with Resonant Tesseral Harmonics,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. FERREIRA, L.D.D. and VILHENA DE MORAES, R. “GPS Satellites Orbits: Resonance,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2009, Article ID 347835, 12 pp.

  8. DELEFLIE, F., LEGENDRE, P., EXERTIER, P. and BARLIER, F. “Long Term Evolution of the Galileo Constellation due to Gravitational Forces,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 36, 2005, pp. 402–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. GARFINKEL, B. “Formal Solution in the Problem of Small Divisors,” Astronomical Journal, Vol. 71, No. 8, 1966, pp. 657–669.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. BROUWER, D. and CLEMENCE, G.M. Methods of Celestial Mechanics, Academic Press, New York and London, 1961, pp. 296ff.

    Google Scholar 

  11. BOCCALETTI, D. and PUCACCO, G. Theory of Orbits. 2: Perturbative and Geometrical Methods, Springer, A&A library, 1998, p. 10.

  12. ALLAN, R.R. “Resonance Effects due to the Longitude Dependence of the Gravitational Field of a Rotating Primary,” Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 15, 1967, pp. 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. LANE, M.T. “An Analytical Treatment of Resonance Effects on Satellite Orbits,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 42, Nos. 1–4, 1988, pp. 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. SOCHILINA, A.S. “On the Motion of a Satellite in Resonance with Its Rotating Plane,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1982, pp. 337–352.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. GEDEON, G.S. “Tesseral Resonance Effects on Satellite Orbits,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1969, pp. 167–189.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. KAMEL, A., EKMAN, D. and TIBBITTS, R. “East-West Stationkeeping Requirements of Nearly Synchronous Satellites due to Earth Triaxiality and Luni-Solar Effects,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1973, pp. 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ELY, T.A. “Eccentricity Impact on East-West Stationkeeping for Global Positioning System Class Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2002, pp. 352–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. BOHLIN, K. “Zur Frage der Convergenz der Reihenentwickelungen in der Störungstheorie,” Astronomische Nachrichten, Vol. 121, No. 2, 1889, 17–24.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. FERRAZ-MELLO, S. Canonical Perturbation Theories. Degenerate Systems and Resonance, 2007, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 345, Springer.

  20. ROMANOWICZ, B.A. “On the Tesseral-Harmonics Resonance Problem in Artificial-Satellite Theory,” SAO Special Report 365, 1975, 52 pp; Part II, SAO Special Report 373, 1976, 30 pp.

  21. MOORE, P. “A Resonant Problem of Two Degrees of Freedom,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1983, pp. 31–47.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. MOORE, P. “A Problem of Libration with Two Degrees of Freedom,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1984, pp. 49–69.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. VALK, S., LEMAÎTRE, A. and DELEFLIE, F. “Semi-Analytical Theory of Mean Orbital Motion for Geosynchronous Space Debris under Gravitational Influence,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 1070–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MCCLAIN, W. D. A Recursively Formulated First-Order Semianalytic Artificial Satellite Theory Based on the Generalized Method of Averaging, Volume 1: The Generalized Method of Averaging Applied to the Artificial Satellite Problem, Computer Sciences Corporation CSC/TR-77/6010, 1977 (“the blue book”). Also: A Semianalytic Artificial Satellite Theory. Volume 1. Application of the Generalized Method of Averaging to the Artificial Satellite Problem, 1992.

  25. DANIELSON, D.A., NETA, B. and EARLY, L.W. Semianalytic Satellite Theory (SST): Mathematical Algorithms, Naval Postgraduate School, NPS Report NPS-MA-94-001, January 1994.

  26. FONTE, D.J., Implementing a 50 × 50 Gravity Field in an Orbit Determination System, Master of Science Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CSDL-T-1169. June 1993.

  27. SCHUTZ, B.E. and CRAIG, D.E. “GPS Orbit Evolution: 1998–2000,” Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Denver, Colorado, Aug 14–17, 2000.

  28. INEICHEN, D., BEUTLER, G. and HUGENTOBLER, U. “Sensitivity of GPS and GLONASS Orbits with Respect to Resonant Geopotential Parameters,” Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 77, 2003, pp. 478–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. FROIDEVAL, L. and SCHUTZ, B.E. “Long arc Analysis of GPS Orbits,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 124, 2006, pp. 653–664.

    Google Scholar 

  30. HORI, G.-I. “Theory of General Perturbation with Unspecified Canonical Variable,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1966, pp. 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  31. DEPRIT, A. 1969 “Canonical Transformations Depending on a Small Parameter,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 12–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. CAMPBELL, J.A. and JEFFERYS, W.H. “Equivalence of the Perturbation Theories of Hori and Deprit,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1970, pp. 467–473.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. DEPRIT, A. “Delaunay Normalisations,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1982, pp. 9–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. SCHUTZ, B.E. “Numerical Studies in the Vicinity of GPS Deep Resonance,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 105, 2000, pp. 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  35. BROUCKE, R. and CEFOLA, P.J. “On the Equinoctial Orbit Elements,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1972, pp. 303–310.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. HINTZ, G.R. “Survey of Orbit Element Sets,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 3, 2008, pp. 785–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. DELHAISE, F. and HENRARD, J. “The Problem of Critical Inclination Combined with a Resonance in Mean Motion in Artificial Satellite Theory,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 55, 1993, pp. 261–153.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. KOZAI, Y. “Second-Order Solution of Artificial Satellite Theory without Air Drag,” Astronomical Journal, Vol. 67, No. 7, 1962, pp. 446–461.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. DEPRIT, A. and ROM, A. “The Main Problem of Artificial Satellite Theory for Small and Moderate Eccentricities,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1970, pp. 166–206.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. MÉTRIS, G. Théorie du mouvement des satellites artificiels — Développement des équations du mouvement moyen — Application à l’étude des longues périodes, Ph.D. Dissertation, Observatoire de Paris, 1991, 188 p.

  41. LYDDANE, R.H. “Small Eccentricities or Inclinations in the Brouwer Theory of the Artificial Satellite,” Astronomical Journal, Vol. 68, 1963, pp. 555–558.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. CHAO, C.-C.G. Applied Orbit Perturbation and Maintenance, The Aerospace Press, El Segundo, California — AIAA Inc., Reston, Virginia, 2005, p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  43. LARA, M., SAN-JUAN, J.F. and CEFOLA, P. “Long-Term Evolution of Galileo Operational Orbits by Canonical Perturbation Theory,” presented as paper IAC-C1.3.9 at the, 62nd International Astronautical Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, 2011.

  44. GARFINKEL, B. “A Theory of Libration,” Celestial Mechanics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1976, pp. 229–246.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. KAULA, W.M. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham, Massachusetts, 1966, p. 50. Reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, N.Y., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  46. SANDERS, J.A. and VERHULST, F. Averaging Methods in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Tokyo, Springer-Verlag 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. PROULX, R., MCCLAIN, W., EARLY, L. and CEFOLA, P. “A Theory for the Short Periodic Motion due to the Tesseral Harmonic Gravity Field,” presented as paper AAS 81-180 at the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Conference, North Lake Tahoe, Nev., August 1981.

  48. CEFOLA, P. and BROUCKE, R. “On the Formulation of the Gravitational Potential in Terms of Equinoctial Variables,” presented as paper AIAA 75-9 at the AIAA 13th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Pasadena, CA, January 1975.

  49. PARDINI, C. and ANSELMO, L. SATRAP: Satellite Reentry Analysis Program, Internal Report C94-17, CNUCE/CNR, Pisa, Italy, 30 August 1994.

  50. CHAO, C.C. and GICK, R.A. “Long-Term Evolution of Navigation Satellite Orbits: GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 34, 2004, pp. 1221–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. DELEFLIE, F., ROSSI, A., PORTMANN, C, MÉTRIS, G. and BARLIER, F. “Semi-Analytical Investigations of the Long Term Evolution of the Eccentricity of Galileo and GPS-Like Orbits,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 47, 2011, pp. 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. CARTER, S.S. Precision Orbit Determination From GPS Receiver Navigation Solutions, Master of Science Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. CSDL-T-1260, June 1996.

  53. LARA, M., SAN-JUAN, J.F., FOLCIK, Z.J. and CEFOLA, P. “Deep Resonant GPS-Dynamics due to the Geopotential,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 140, 2011, pp. 1985–2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Lara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lara, M., San-Juan, J.F., Folcik, Z.J. et al. Deep Resonant GPS-Dynamics Due to the Geopotential. J of Astronaut Sci 58, 661–676 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321536

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321536

Keywords

Navigation