Welding in the World

, Volume 56, Issue 11–12, pp 66–78 | Cite as

Modeling Of Hydrogen Distributionin A Duplex Stainless Steel

  • Tobias Mente
  • Thomas Bollinghaus
Peer-Reviewed Section


Quite a number of models for hydrogen distribution in steels and welds have been developed in the past 20 years. They reach from simple analytical models to more complex two and three dimensional finite element simulations. So far, these models have been used to simulate hydrogen distribution in homogeneous microstructure. This paper contributes to numerical simulation of hydrogen distribution in heterogeneous microstructure, e.g. in a duplex stainless steel microstructure consisting of two phase fractions. Under appropriate conditions, such as cathodic protection, it is possible that hydrogen is absorbed leading to material embrittlement and possibly initiating hydrogen assisted cracking. In order to avoid hydrogen assisted cracking in duplex stainless steels, it is of great interest to know more about the diffusion behavior of the ferrite and austenite phase. A numerical model has been developed that operates on the mesoscale and enables simulation of hydrogen transport in the various phases of a metallic material.

As a first application of this model, hydrogen distribution in a duplex stainless steel 1.4462, consisting of approximately equal portions of ferrite and austenite, was simulated using the finite element program package ANSYS. The results reflect the dependency of hydrogen distribution on the microstructural alignment of the ferrite and austenite phase fractions. Crack-critical areas can thus be identified, provided the critical strain-hydrogen combination is known for the respective microstructural phase.

IIW- Thesaurus keywords

Simulation Duplex stainless steel Hydrogen Diffusion Weld metal Microstructure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Alvarez-Armas I.:Duplex Stainless Steels: Brief History and Some Recent Alloys. Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 1 (2008), No. 1, pp. 51–57.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Lo K.H., Shek C.H. and Lai J.K.L.: Recent developments in stainless steels. Materials Science and Engineering R, Vol. 65 (2009), No. 4–6, pp. 39–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Olden V., Thaulow C., Johnsen R., Østby E. and Berstad T.: Influence of hydrogen from cathodic protection on the fracture susceptibility of 25%Cr duplex stainless steel — Constant load SENT testing and FE-modelling using hydrogen influenced cohesive zone elements. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 76 (2009), No. 7 pp. 827–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Oltra R. and Bouillot C.: Experimental investigation of the role of hydrogen in stress corrosion cracking of duplex stainless steel. In: Hydrogen-transport and cracking in metals. A. Turnbull (ed.), 1994, pp. 17-27.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Huang J.-H. and Altstetter C.J.: Cracking of Duplex Stainless Steel Due to Dissolved Hydrogen. Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A, Vol. 26 (1995), No. 5, pp. 1079–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kikuchi Y., Lundin C. and Khan K.: Measurement of diffusible hydrogen content and hydrogen effects on the cracking potential of duplex stainless steel weldments (Part 1). Transactions Of JWRI, Vol. 20 (1991), No. 2, pp. 95–104.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Boellinghaus Th., Hoffmeister H. and Dangeleit A.: A scatterband for hydrogen diffusion coefficients in micro-alloyed and low carbon structural steels. Welding In the World, Vol. 35 (1995), No. 2, pp. 83–96.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Boellinghaus Th., Hoffmeister H. and Middel C.: Scatterbands for hydrogen diffusion coefficients in steel having a ferritic or martensitic microstructure and steels having an austenitic microstructure at room temperature. Welding In the World, Vol. 37 (1996), No. 1, pp. 16–23.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Unger D.J. and Aifantis E.C.: On the theory of stress-assisted diffusion II. Acta Mechanica, Vol. 47 (1983), No. 1–2, pp. 117–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Boellinghaus Th. and Hoffmeister H.: Numerical Model for Hydrogen-Assisted Cracking. Corrosion, Vol. 56 (2000), No. 6, pp. 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Boellinghaus Th. and Hoffmeister H.: Finite Element Calculations of Pre- and Post-Heating Procedures for Sufficient Hydrogen Removal in Butt Joints. In: Mathematical Modelling of Weld Phenomena 3, H. Cerjak (ed.), 1997, pp. 726-756.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Turnbull A.: Modelling of Environment Assisted Cracking. Corrosion Science, Vol. 34 (1993), No. 6, pp. 921–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Maroef I., Olson D.L., Eberhart M. and Edwards G.R.: Hydrogen trapping in ferritic steel weld metal. International Materials Reviews, Vol. 47 (2002), No. 4, pp. 191–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Brauser S., Kannengießer Th.: Hydrogen absorption of different welded duplex steels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 35 (2010), No. 9, pp. 4368–4374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Beyer K., Brauser S. and Kannengießer Th.:Trägergas-Heißextraktion zur Analyse der Wasserstoffeinlagerung und -effusion in Duplexgefügen. (Analysis of the hydrogen-occlusion and effusion in duplex microstructures using carrier gas hot extraction). In: Tagung Werkstoffprüfung (Conference on Materials Testing), M. Pohl (ed.), December 2010, Neu-Ulm.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    ThyssenKrupp: Nirosta® 4462 (uns s 31803/uns s 32205) ferritic-austenitic duplex steel with high strength and corrosion resistance, 2009, Online:, [last status: 19.02.2011].
  17. [17]
    Viyanit E.: Numerical Simulation of Hydrogen Assisted Cracking in Supermartensitic Stainless Steel Welds. Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, PhD.-Thesis, 2005, 196 pages.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Wongpanya, Th. Böllinghaus, G. Lothongkum, H. Hoffmeister: Numerical Modelling of Cold Crack Initiation and Propagation in S 1100 QL Steel Root Welds, Welding in the World, Vol. 53 (2009), No. 3/4, pp. R34–R43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Olden V., Thaulow C., Johnsen R., Østby E. and Berstad T.: Application of hydrogen influenced cohesive laws in the prediction of hydrogen induced stress cracking in 25%Cr duplex stainless steel. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 75 (2008), No. 8, pp. 2333–2351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Turnbull A., Hutchings R.B.: Analysis of hydrogen atom transport in a two-phase alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 177 (1994), No. 1–2, pp. 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Owczarek E. and Zakroczymski T.: Hydrogen transport in a duplex stainless steel. Acta Materialia, Vol. 48 (2000), No. 12, pp. 3059–3070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Dabah E., Lisitsyn V. and Eliezer D.: Performance of hydrogen trapping and phase transformation in hydrogenated duplex stainless steels. Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 527 (2010), No. 18–19, pp. 4851–4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Ansys Inc.: Element reference, 2009, Online:, [last status: 19.02.2011].
  24. [24]
    Menezes A., Abreu H., Kundu S., Bhadeshia H.K.D.H. and Kelly P.M.: Crystallography of Widmanstätten austenite in duplex stainless steel weld metal. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, Vol. 14 (2009), No. 1, pp. 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Chen S.S., Wu T.I. and Wu J.K.: Effects of deformation on hydrogen degradation in a duplex stainless steel. Journal Of Materials Science, Vol. 39 (2004), No. 1, pp. 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Kaçar R.: Effect of solidification mode and morphology of microstructure on the hydrogen content of duplex stainless steel weld metal. Materials & Design, Vol. 25 (2004), No. 1, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Olden V., Thaulow C. and Johnsen R.: Modelling of hydrogen diffusion and hydrogen induced cracking in supermartensitic and duplex stainless steels. Materials and Design, Vol. 29 (2008), No. 10, pp. 1934–1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Langley R. A.: Hydrogen trapping, diffusion and recombination in austenitic stainless steels. Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol. 128-129 (1984), pp. 622–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Mehrer H.: Diffusion in Solids, Fundamentals, Methods,Materials, Diffusion-Controlled Processes. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, ISBN 978-3-540-71486-6, pp. 547–581.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Yoshikazu H. and Shu W.M.: Iron (Ruthenium and Osmium)-Hydrogen Systems. Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 73-75 (2000), pp. 65–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Brass A.M. and Chene J.: Influence of deformation on the hydrogen behavior in iron and nickel base alloys: a review of experimental data. Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A, Vol. 242 (1998), No. 1–2, pp. 210–221.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Głowacka A., Woniak M.J, Nolze G. and Witnicki W.A.: Hydrogen induced phase transformations in austenitic-ferritic steel. Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 112 (2006), pp. 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Yang Q., Qiao L.J., Chiovelli S. and Luo J.L.: Critical hydrogen charging conditions for martensite transformation and surface cracking in type 304 stainless steels. Scripta Materialia, Vol. 40 (1999), No. 11, pp. 1209–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Rozenak P. and Bergman R.: X-ray phase analysis of martensitic transformations in austenitic stainless steels electrochemically charged with hydrogen. Material Science & Engineering A, Vol. 437 (2006), No. 2, pp. 366–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and TestingGermany

Personalised recommendations