Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pulpotomy in primary teeth: Review of the literature according to standardized assessment criteria

  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim: To assess the relevant literature using a modification of the criteria listed in the introductory paper to this issue [Curzon and Toumba, 2006], and to review several new publications on pulpotomies with different materials and techniques that appeared after previously published reviews. Methods: A search of the relevant literature on pulpotomies was identified through Medline between the years 1966–2005. The search generated a total of 358 citations and sieving of these papers was conducted by examining the paper title and assessing its relevance [Loh et al, 2004]. Only clinical studies (non-specified) and retrospective studies were included for assessment. There were 17 criteria (considered major) weighed 2 points and 8 criteria weighed 1 point. A paper that would score between 38–42 points (90+ %) was assessed as Grade A, a score from 32 to 37 points (75–89%) was Grade B1, and between 25 to 31 points (60–74%) Graded B2. Any other paper that reached 24 points or less (less than 59%) was rated Grade C. Results: Of the 358 papers originally identified 48 clinical trials were evaluated according to the set criteria. There was only one paper grade A, 5 papers graded B1, 3 graded B2 and 39 received a C grade. Formocresol or ferric sulphate medicaments were found to be likely to have similar clinical/radiographic results, and MTA seemed to be a more favourable pulp dressing. Conclusion: No conclusion can be made as to the optimum treatment or technique for pulpally involved primary teeth. More high quality, properly planned prospective studies are necessary to clarify these points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamy HA, Bakry NS, Mounir MM, Avery DR. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:302–309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth; a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25:29–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alacam A. Long term effects of primary teeth pulpotomies with formocresol, glutaraldehyde-calcium hydroxide and glutaraldehyde-zinc oxide eugenol on succedaneous teeth. J Pedod 1989; 18:123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo FB, Ely LB, Pergo AM, Pesce HF. A clinical evaluation of 2% buffered glutaraldehyde in pulpotomies of human deciduous teeth: a 24-month study. Braz Dent 1995; 6:41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach C, Moutschen-Damen M, Moutschen M. Genetic and cytogenetical effects of formaldehyde and related compounds. Mutat Res 1977; 39:317–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JE. Pulp tissue reaction to formocresol and zinc-oxide eugenol. J Dent Child 1965; 32:13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study on deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Research 1997; 31: 411–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorndal L, Thylstrup A. A practice-based study on stepwise excavation of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1998:26; 122–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Block RM, Lewis RD, Sheats JB, Fauley J. Cell-mediated immune response to dog pulp tissue altered by formocresol within the root canal. J Endod 1977; 3:424–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Block RM, Lewis RD, Sheats JB, Burke SG. Antibody formation to dog pulp tissue altered by formocresol within the root canal. Oral Surg 1978; 45:282–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett S, Walker J. Comparison of ferric sulfate, formocresol and a combination of ferric sulfate/formocresol in primary tooth vital pulpotomies: a retrospective radiographic survey. J Dent Child 2002; 69: 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas MJ, Layung MA, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL. Two-year outcomes of primary molar ferric sulfate pulpotomy and root canal therapy.Pediatr Dent 2003; 25: 97–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casas MJ, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL. Long-term outcomes of primary molar ferric sulfate pulpotomy and root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:44–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casas M J, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL et al. Outcomes of vital primary incisor ferric sulfate pulpotomy and root canal therapy. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70: 34–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curzon MEJ, Toumba KJ. Restoration of primary teeth: Criteria for assessment of the literature 2006; Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 7, special issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean JA, Mack RB, Fulkerson BT, Sanders BJ. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003; 12:177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks AB. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: A preliminary report. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:15–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot RD, Roberts MW, Burkes J, Phillips C. Evaluation of carbon dioxide laser on vital human primary pulp tissue. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21:327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadavi S, Anderson AW. A comparison of the pulpal response to freeze-dried bone, calcium hydroxide, and zinc oxide-eugenol in primary teeth in two cynomolgus monkeys. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18:52–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falster CA, Araujo FB, Straffon LH, Nor JE. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of am adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 241–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp treatmentof deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 278–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, Mushayt A. Success of minerals trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005; 29:307–311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fei AL, Udin RD, Johnson R. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13:327–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman SA, Udin RD, Good DL, Rodef F. Success of electrofulguration pulpotomies covered by zinc oxide and eugenol or calcium hydroxide: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18:385–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuks AB, Bimstein E. Clinical evaluation of diluted formocresol pulpotomy in primary teeth of school children. Pediatr Dent 1981; 3:321–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuks AB, Bimstein E, Klein H, Guelmann M. Assessment of a 2%buffered glutaraldehyde solution in pulpotomized primary teeth of schoolchildren. J Dent Child 1990; 57:371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuks AB, Holan G, Davis JM, Eidelman E. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: long term follow-up. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19:327–330.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuks AB. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2002; 3:115–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuks AB: Pulp Therapy For The Primary Dentition, In Pediatric Dentistry, Infancy Through Adolescence. 2005; J R Pinkham. Elsevier, 11830 Westline Industrial Drive, St. Louis, MO—4th Edition, 375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruythuysen RJ, Weerheijm KL. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy with a light-cured cavity-sealing material after two years. J Dent Child 1997; 64:251–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guelmann M, Fair J, Turner C, Courts FJ. The success of emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24:217–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guelmann M, MIlwain MF, Primosch RE. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27:24–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holan G, Fuks AB, Keltz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crowns vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24:212–216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB. Lon-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral Trioxide Aggregate and formocresol. Pediatr Dent 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, Hollweck R, et al. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques-randomized controlled trial.J Dent Res 2005; 84:1144–1148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrevic H, Al-Jame Q. Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2000; 24:269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Agency for Research on Cancer. Press release no. 153. 15 June 2004. [WWW document.] URL

  • Judd PL, Kenny DJ. Formocresol concerns: A review. J Can Dent Assoc 1987; 53:401–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaskar RR, Damle SG. Comparative evaluation of lyophilized freeze dried platelet derived preparation with calcium hydroxide as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2004; 22:24–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch G, Nyborg H. Correlation between clinical and histological indications for pulpotomy of deciduous teeth. J Int Assoc Dent Child 1970; 1:3–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loh A, O’Hoy P, Tran X, et al. Evidence-based assessment. Evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy. Pediatric Dentistry 2004; 26:401–409.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson BO. Therapeutic pulpotomies in primary molars with the formocresol technique. Acta Odontol Scand 1978; 36:157–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markovic D, Zibojinovic V, Bucetic M. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2005; 6:133–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maroto M, Barberia E, Planells P, Garcia Godoy F. Dentin bridge formation after mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomies in primary teeth. Am J Dent 2005; 18:151–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mejare I. Pulpotomy of primary molars with coronal or total pulpitis using formocresol technique. Scand J Dent Res 1979; 87:208–216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW Jr, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults. J Dent Child 1995; 62:97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertz-Fairhurst EJ et al. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:55–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morawa AP, Straffon LH, Han SS, Corpron RE. Clinical evaluation of pulpotomies using dilute formocresol. J Dent Child 1975; 42:28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers DR, Shoaf HK, Dirksen TR, Pashley DH, Whitford GM, Reynolds KE. Distribution of 14c formaldehyde after pulpotomy with formocresol. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 96:805–813.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naik S, Hegde AM. Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy agent in primary molars: An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005; 23:13–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadine G, Goel BR, Yeung CA, Glenny AM. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochraine Database Syst Rev 2003; (1):CD0033220. Review.

  • Nakashima M. The induction of reparative dentine in the amputated dental pulp of the dog by bone morphogenetic protein. Arch Oral Biol 1990;35:493–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M. Induction of dentine formation on canine amputated pulp by recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP)-2 and 4. J Dent Res 1994;73:1515–1522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash C, Chandra S, Jaiswal JN. Formocresol and pulpotomies in primary teeth. J Pedod 1989; 13:314–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Primosch, RE, Glom TA, Jerrell RG. Primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in predoctoral pediatric dental programs in the United States. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19:118–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pruhs RJ, Olen GA, Sharma PS. Relationship between formocresol pulpotomies on primary teeth and enamel defects on their permanent successors. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 94:698–700.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redig DF. A comparison and evaluation of two formocresol pulpotomy technics utilizing “Buckley’s “formocresol. J Dent Child 1968; 35: 22–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera N, Reyes E, Mazzaoui S, Moron A. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study. J Dent child 2003; 70:71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford RB, Wahle J, Tucker M, Roger D, Charette M. Induction of reparative dentine formation in monkeys by recombinant human osteogenic protein-1. Arch Oral Biol 1993; 38:571–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman B, Sigal M, Clokie C, Rukavina J, et al. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005;15: 437–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki H, Ogawa T, Koreeda M, Ozaki T, et al. Electrocoagulation extends the indication of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in the primary dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26:275–277.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder U. A 2-year follow-up of primary molars, pulpotomized with a gentle technique and capped with calcium hydroxide. Scand J Dent Res 1978; 86:273–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shumayrikh NM, Adenubi JO. Clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde with calcium hydroxide and glutaraldehyde with zinc oxide eugenol in pulpotomy of primary molars. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15:259–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NL, Seale NS, Nunn ME. Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22:192–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan V, Patchett CL, Waterhouse JP. Is there life after Buckley’s formocresol? Part I—A narrative review of alternative interventions and materials. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16:117–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Straffon LH, Loos P. The indirect pulp cap: a review and commentary. J Israel Dent Assoc 2000; 17: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stange DM, Seale NS, Nunn ME, Strange M. Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23:331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HW, Feigal RJ, Messer HH. Cytotoxicity of glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde in relation to time of exposure and concentration. Pediatr Dent 1990; 12:303–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson KS, Seale NS, Nunn ME, Huff G. Alternative method of hemorrhage control in full strength formocresol pulpotomy. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23:217–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas KG, Packham B. Radiographic success of ferric sulfate and formocresol pulpotomies in relation to early exfoliation. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27:233–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vij R, Coll JA, Shelton P, Farooq NS. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:214–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse PJ, Nunn JH, Whitworth JM, Soames JV. Primary molar pulp therapy—histological evaluation of failure. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000; 10:313–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse PJ, Nunn JH, Whitworth JM. Prostaglandin E2 and treatment outcome in pulp therapy of primary molars with carious exposures. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12:116–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  • Duggal, M.S., Nooh, A., High, A. Response of the primary pulp to Inflammation: A review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future. Eur J Paed Dent 2000; 3:112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falster CA, Araujo FB, Straffon LH, Nor JE. Indirect pulp capping: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:241–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp capping in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Padiatr Dent 2000;22:278–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson P. Pulp treatment of deciduous teeth. I. Clinical investigation. Br Dent J 1970;128, 232–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holan G, E.Eidelman E, Fuks A. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatric Dentistry 2005; 27: 129–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadine G, Goel BR, Yeung CA, Glenny AM. Pulp therapy for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syt Rev 2003; (1): CD0033220. Review.

  • Vij R, Coll JA, Shelton P, Farooq NS. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy. Pediatr Dent2004;26:214–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Hebrew University, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, P.O.Box 12272, Jerusalem, Israel, 91120

    A. B. Fuks

  2. Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Athens University, Athens, Greece

    L. Papagiannoulis

  3. Dept. Paediatric dentistry, University of Leeds, England

    M. S. Duggal

Authors
  1. A. B. Fuks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Papagiannoulis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. S. Duggal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Fuks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuks, A.B., Papagiannoulis, L. & Duggal, M.S. Pulpotomy in primary teeth: Review of the literature according to standardized assessment criteria. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 1, 64–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320817

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320817

Key words

Search

Navigation