Skip to main content
Log in

Current Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment in Japan

Case Study and Discussion-Voting System

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Toward Integrated Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Nexavar (TiTAN) Symposium was held in August 2010 in Tokyo, Japan, during which the position of sorafenib (Nexavar®) in the treatment of HCC in Japan (for which it received approval in 2009) was discussed by a panel of eight expert hepatologists in a session chaired by Dr Kudo. The following article focuses on the discussion that went on during this session, including question and answer sessions regarding the experiences of the 350 conference attendees in treating patients with HCC, as well as some of the more challenging disease management issues.

Since 2008, when the phase III Sorafenib Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP) trial demonstrated an increase in the median overall survival (OS) for patients with unresectable HCC treated with sorafenib compared with placebo, international and Japanese guidelines recommend sorafenib as a first-line option for patients with advanced HCC Child-Pugh liver function class A who have extrahepatic metastasis. Sorafenib is also recommended for patients unresponsive to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Importantly, if HCC is judged to be unresponsive to TACE, treatment should be switched to sorafenib in a timely manner.

Almost half of the conference attendees said that they used both the Japan Society of Hepatology clinical practice guidelines and the clinical practice guidelines for HCC when determining treatment strategies for individual HCC patients. Sorafenib should currently not be used as adjuvant therapy or in combination with TACE or HAIC until evidence from ongoing clinical trials shows that it is beneficial in these settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals. Nexavar approved in Japan for the treatment of advanced liver cancer. 2009 [cited; Available from: http://press.bayerhealthcare.com/en/press/auth/news-details-page.php/13182/2009-0239

  2. Omata M, Lesmana LA, Tateishi R, et al. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology International 2010; 4(2): 439–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Japan Society of Hepatology. The Japanese HCC Clinical Practice Guideline. Treatment algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology Research 2010; 40 (Suppl. 1): 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kudo M, Izumi N, Kokudo N, et al. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 updated version. Dig Dis 2011; 29(3): 339–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruix J, Sherman M. AASLD Practice Guideline: Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update. Available at http://www.aasld.org/practiceguidelines/Documents/Bookmarked%20Practice%20Guidelines/HCCUpdate2010.pdf (Accessed 14 Nov 2010). Hepatology 2010; July: 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2003; 362(9399): 1907–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008; 359(4): 378–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sherman M, Mazzaferro V, Amadori D, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread: A subanalysis from the SHARP trial. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (May 20 suppl): abstract 4584

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kudo M, Ueshima K. Positioning of a molecular-targeted agent, sorafenib, in the treatment algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma and implication of many complete remission cases in Japan. Oncology 2010 Jul; 78 (Suppl. 1): 154–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Furuse J, Okusaka T, Kaneko S, et al. Phase I/II study of the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of S-1 in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2010; 101(12): 2606–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Molecular targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2008 Oct; 48(4): 1312–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, et al. Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Hepatology 2000; 32(6): 1224–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shiina S, Teratani T, Obi S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation with ethanol injection for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2005; 129(1): 122–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Charnsangavej C, Chuang VP, Wallace S, et al. Angiographic classification of hepatic arterial collaterals. Radiology 1982; 144(3): 485–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ikeda K, Kumada H, Saitoh S, et al. Effect of repeated trans-catheter arterial embolization on the survival time in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. An analysis by the Cox proportional hazard model. Cancer 1991; 68(10): 2150–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawamura Y, Ikeda K, Hirakawa M, et al. Efficacy of platinum analogue for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma unresponsive to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with epirubicin. Hepatol Res 2009; 39(4): 346–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maeda N, Osuga K, Higashihara H, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with cisplatin as second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma unresponsive to chemoembolization with epirubicin-lipiodol emulsion. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011 Feb; 35(1): E82–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Galle P, Blanc J, Van Laethem J-L, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and prior anti-tumor therapy: a subanalysis from the SHARP trial. 43rd annual meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL 2008) Milan, Italy April 23–27, 2008 2008 [cited; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18817997

  19. Iwasa S, Ikeda M, Okusaka T, et al. Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy with a fine-powder formulation of cisplatin for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011 Jun; 41(6): 770–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Sorafenib. Prescribing information. Available at http://www.nexavar.com/html/download/Nexavar_PI.pdf Accessed 2 December 2010. 2009

  21. Ueshima K, Kudo M, Tanaka M, et al. Session 11-05, Phase I study of sorafenib in combination with low-dose cisplatin and fluorouracil intra-arterail infusion chemotherapy. Osaka, Japan: The 2nd Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting-A Bridge to Consensus on HCC Management, 2011

  22. Kudo M. Molecular Targeted Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Tokyo: Arc Media, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kudo M, Imanaka K, Chida N, et al. Phase III study of sorafenib after transarterial chemoembolisation in Japanese and Korean patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2011; (14): 2117–27

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vagefi PA, Hirose R. Downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplant: is there a role for adjuvant sorafenib in locoregional therapy? J Gastrointest Cancer 2010; 41(4): 217–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saab S, McTigue M, Finn RS, et al. Sorafenib as adjuvant therapy for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant recipients: feasibility and efficacy. Exp Clin Transplant 2010; 8(4): 307–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yeganeh M, Finn RS, Saab S. Apparent remission of a solitary metastatic pulmonary lesion in a liver transplant recipient treated with sorafenib. Am J Transplant 2009; 9(12): 2851–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhoori S, Toffanin S, Sposito C, et al. Personalized molecular targeted therapy in advanced, recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: a proof of principle. J Hepatol 2010; 52(5): 771–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masatoshi Kudo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kudo, M., Tateishi, R., Yamashita, T. et al. Current Status of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment in Japan. Clin Drug Investig 32 (Suppl 2), 37–51 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03265495

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03265495

Keywords

Navigation