Skip to main content
Log in

Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): A 4 year clinical study

  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

AIM: This was to evaluate the retention rate of fissure sealants applied to MIH molars with occlusal enamel opacities, using two different application methods after 4 years. METHODS: 54 children exhibiting molars with MIH aged 6–7 years, participated in the study. Selection criteria: presence of at least 2 fully erupted caries-free maxillary or mandibular first permanent molars in the opposite sides of the mouth, both with occlusal enamel opacities without breakdown. Following parental consent, sealants were applied using a half-mouth experimental design. Group A: On a randomly assigned first molar on one side of the mouth sealants (Fissurit®) were placed using a single bottle adhesive system (One-step®) prior to sealant application. Group B: Sealants were applied on the contra-lateral molar using the conventional etch and seal technique. Children were seen biannually when a preventive program was applied, without replacing any lost sealant. RESULTS: After 4 years, 47 sets of molars (94 teeth) were available for blind evaluation. Teeth in Group A presented a better retention rate; 70.2% were fully sealed, 29.7% partly sealed and none unsealed (lost sealant). Group B revealed 25.5% fully sealed, 44.6% partly sealed and 29.7% unsealed teeth. STATISTICS: Differences between groups A and B were statistically significant (p<0.001). Also both groups revealed a decreasing retention rate over the 4-year period (p<0.001). There was no difference in dental caries increment rate and enamel breakdowns at the end of the study (p>0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In hypomineralised molars with occlusal opacities sealants appear to have greater retention when applied using 5th generation adhesive systems prior to sealant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp J, Caufield PW, Crall JJ, et al. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants. A report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139:257–268.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burbridge L, Nugent Z, Deery C. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a one step conditioning agent in sealant placement: 6-month results. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006; 16(6):424–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla N, Messer LB, Silva M. Clinical Studies on Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation Part 1: Distribution and Putative Associations. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent. 2008; 9(4):180–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayle SA. Molar incisor hypomineralisation: restorative management. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003; 4:121–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, et al. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res. 2000; 79(11):1850–1856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feigal RJ, Donly KJ:, The Use of Pit and Fissure Sealants. Pediatr Dent. 2006; 28:143–150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Silva JM, Torres CP, Contente M, et al. Bond Strength of a Pit-and-Fissure Sealant Associated to Etch-and-Rinse and Self-Etching Adhesive Systems to Saliva-Contaminated Enamel: Individual vs. Simultaneous Light Curing. Braz Dent J. 2008; 19(4):341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijs S.C.B, Dietz W, Noren J.G, Blanksma N.G, Jalevik B. Morhology and chemical composition of dentin in permanent first molars with the diagnose MIH. Swed Dent J. 2007; 31:155–164.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jälevik B, Noren JG. Enamel hypomineralization of permanent first molars: a morphological study and survey of possible aetiological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000; 10:278–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasulaityte L, Veerkamp JS, Weerheijm KL. Molar incisor hypomineralization: review and prevalence data from a study of primary school children in Kaunas (Lithuania). Eur Archs Paediatr Dent. 2007; 8(2):87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsanos N, Kaklamanos EG, Arapostathis K. Treatment management of first permanent molars in children with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005; 6(4):179–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loguercio AD., Reis A. Application of a Dental Adhesive Using the Self-Etch and Etch-and-Rinse Approaches: An 18-Month Clinical Evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139;53–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lygidakis NA, Chaliasou A, Siounas G. Evaluation of composite restorations in hypomineralised permanent molars: a four years clinical study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003; 4(3):143–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lygidakis N.A., Oulis C.I., Christodoulidis A. Evaluation of fissure sealant retention following 4 different isolation and surface preparation techniques. Four years clinical trial. J Clin Pediat Dent. 1994; 19(1):23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Briseniou E. Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation (MIH). Retrospective clinical study in Greek children. I. Prevalence and defect characteristics. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent. 2008a; 9(4):200–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Marinou D. Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation (MIH). A retrospective clinical study in Greek children. II. Possible medical aetiological factors. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent. 2008b; 9(4):207–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marthu-Muju K, Wright TJ. Diagnosis and Treatment of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization. Compedium 2006; 27(11):604–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Bolla M, Lupi-Pégurier L, Tardieu C, Velly AM, Antomarchi C. Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006; 34:321–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papacchini F, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resinmodified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent. 2005; 33(6):459–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira J, Eidelman E. Six-year clinical evaluation of fissure sealants placed after mechanical preparation: a matched pair study. Pediatr Dent. 1986; 8(3):204–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welbury R., Raadal M., Lygidakis NA. EAPD guidelines for the use of pit and fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2004; 5(3):179–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • William V, Burrow MF, Palamara JE, Messer L. Microshear bond strength of resin composite to teeth affected by molar hypomineralisation using 2 adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent. 2006; 28:233–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott NS, Bryan RA, Duggal MS. Molar-incisor-hypomineralisation: a literature review. Eur Archs Paediatr Dent. 2008; 9(4):172–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Lygidakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lygidakis, N.A., Dimou, G. & Stamataki, E. Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): A 4 year clinical study . Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 10, 223–226 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262686

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262686

Key words

Navigation