Advertisement

The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences

, Volume 54, Issue 3–4, pp 485–503 | Cite as

Optimal altitude-constrained low-thrust transfer between inclined Circular Orbits

  • Jean A. Kéchichian
Article

Abstract

The reformulated Edelbaum problem of the minimum-time low-thrust transfer between inclined circular orbits is further extended in order to constrain the intermediate orbits during the transfer to remain below a given altitude. The minimum-time problem involving an inequality constraint on the orbital velocity is shown to be equivalent to one involving an equality constraint in terms of the thrust yaw angle representing the control variable that is optimized resulting in the minimum-time solution. The transfers are shown to comprise an initial unconstrained arc followed by a constrained arc where the altitude remains constant while pure inclination change is effected, and terminating by a final unconstrained arc with simultaneous altitude and inclination changes as during the first arc.

Keywords

Circular Orbit Semimajor Axis Optimal Control Theory Inclination Change Orbital Velocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    EDELBAUM, T. N. “Propulsion Requirements for Controllable Satellites,” ARS Journal, August 1961, pp. 1079–1089.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    KÉCHICHIAN, J. A. “Reformulation of Edelbaum’s Low-Thrust Transfer Problem Using Optimal Control Theory,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 5, September–October 1997.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    BRYSON, 6A. E., JR. and HO, Y-C. Applied Optimal Control, Ginn and Company, Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969, pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    HESTENES, M. R. Optimization Theory, Krieger, Huntington, NY, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    EWING, G.M. Calculus of Variations with Applications, Dover, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    WIESEL, W. E. and ALFANO, S. “Optimal Many-Revolution Orbit Transfer,” presented as paper AAS 83-352 at the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Lake Placid, NY, August 1983.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    BRYSON, A. E., JR., DENHAM, W. F., and DREYFUS, S. E. “Optimal Programming Problems with Inequality Constraints I: Necessary Conditions for Extremal Solutions,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 1, No. 11, Nov. 1963, pp. 2544–2551.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    SPEYER, J. L. and BRYSON, A. E., JR. “Optimal Programming Problems with a Bounded State Space,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 6, No. 8, August 1968, pp. 1488–1491.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Astronautical Society, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Astrodynamics DepartmentThe Aerospace CorporationLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations