Abstract
This paper proposes new probability-distribution functions (PDFs) for the inertia dyadic. Representing uncertainty in rigid-body rotational dynamics with these PDFs preserves constraints on the moments and products of inertia that arise from the underlying physics but which conventional approaches violate. Specifically, we propose representing uncertainty in terms of parameters closely related to the radii of gyration and in terms of Euler parameters (for the orientation of the principal axes with respect to a set of body-fixed reference coordinates). The physical constraints on the inertia matrix are shown to be satisfied for any distribution in these special parameters and if the Euler parameters are given a radially constrained Gaussian distribution. Although unconventional, this uncertainty structure is shown to be broadly applicable. We consider the example of spacecraft/launch vehicle separation analysis for an early-stage spacecraft program, when mass properties are ill-defined. Here, misplaced conservatism in requirements can be costly. The proposed PDFs are shown to guarantee physically realizable results, while more naïve approaches yield non-physical behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
GREENWOOD, D. T. Principles of Dynamics, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, 1988.
SHUSTER, M. D. “A Survey of Attitude Representations,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 4, October–December, 1993, pp. 439–517.
ABRAMOWITZ, M. and STEGUN, I. A. (editors) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th printing. Dover Publications, 1972.
SHUSTER, M. “Man, Like These Attitudes Are Totally Random!: II. Other Representations,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Spaceflight Mechanics 2001, Volume 108, pp. 397–407.
SHUSTER, M. “Man, Like These Attitudes Are Totally Random!: I. Quaternions,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Spaceflight Mechanics 2001, Volume 108, pp. 383–396.
BAUER, R. “Uniform Sampling of SO3,” 2001 Flight Mechanics Symposium, edited by John P. Lynch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, pp. 347–359.
MULLER, M. E. “A Note on a Method for Generating Points Uniformly on N-Dimensional Spheres,” Communications in the Association of Computing Machines, Vol. 2, 1959, pp. 19–20.
AHMED, J., Coppola, V. T., and BERNSTEIN, D. S. “Asymptotic Tracking of Spacecraft Attitude Motion with Inertia Identification,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 21, 1998, pp. 684–691.
NICEWARNER, K. E. and SANDERSON “A General Representation for Orientation Uncertainty Using Random Unit Quaternions,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, May 1994, pp. 1161–1168.
CRAIG, J. J. Introduction to Robotics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Inc., 1989.
SOBOL, I. M. A Primer for the Monte Carlo Method, CRC Press, 1994.
GARG, S. C., TILLEY, S.W., and PATTERSON, T. C. “Design and Development of the INTELSAT VII and VIIA Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem,” presented at the AIAA, AHS, and ASEE Aerospace Design Conference, Irvine, California, February 16–19, 1993.
PECK, M. “Stable Relative Equilibria of a Dissipative Controller for Gyrostat Attitude,” Proceedings of the 2001 AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Quebec City, Canada, cJuly 2001, pp. 1105–1120.
HUGHES, P. C. Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics, John Wiley and Sons, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peck, M.A. Uncertainty models for physically realizable Inertia Dyadics. J of Astronaut Sci 54, 1–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256473
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256473