, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 31–39 | Cite as

Das Rätsel des prozeßorientierten Softwarequalitätsmanagement

  • Werner Mellis
  • Dirk Stelzer
WI — Aufsatz


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Ande96]
    Anderson, Christopher: A World Gone Soft: A Survey of the Software Industry. In: IEEE Engineering Management Review 24 (1996) 4, S. 21–37.Google Scholar
  2. [Arth92]
    Arthur, Lowell Jay: Improving Software Quality. An Insider’s Guide to TQM. Wiley, New York 1992.Google Scholar
  3. [Arth96]
    Arthur, W. Brian: Increasing Returns and the New World of Business. In: Harvard Business Review 74 (1996) 4, S. 100–109.Google Scholar
  4. [Bach94]
    Bach, James: The Immaturity of the CMM. In: American Programmer 7 (1994) 9, S. 13–18.Google Scholar
  5. [Bach95]
    Bach, James: The challenge of good enough Software. In: American Programmer 8 (1995) 10, S. 2–11.Google Scholar
  6. [Be1195]
    Bellin, Georg: Softwarequalitätsmanagement gemäß ISO 9000 — Eine empirische Untersuchung zertifizierter Qualitätsmanagementsysteme anhand ausgewählter Aspekte. Diplomarbeit, Universität zu Köln, Köln 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [BePa97]
    Beirne, Martin; Panteli, Androniki; Ramsay, Harvie: Going soft on quality?: Process management in the Scottish Software industry. In: Software Quality Journal 6 (1997) 3, S. 195–209.Google Scholar
  8. [BoMc91]
    Bollinger, Terrry B.; McGowan, Clement: A Critical Look at Software Capability Evaluations. In: IEEE Software 8 (1991) 7, S. 25–48.Google Scholar
  9. [Coal94]
    Coallier, Francois: How ISO 9001 fits into the Software world. In: IEEE Software 11 (1994) 1, S. 98–100.Google Scholar
  10. [Coal95]
    Coallier, Francois: TRILLIUM: A Model for the Assessment of Telecom Product Development & Support Capability. In: Software Process Newsletter 2 (1995) 1, S. 3–8.Google Scholar
  11. [Curt94]
    Curtis, Bill: A Mature View of the CMM. In: American Programmer 7 (1994) 9, S. 19–28.Google Scholar
  12. [CuSe95]
    Cusumano, Michael A.; Selby, Richard W.: Microsoft Secrets: How the world’s most powerful Software company creates technology, shapes markets, and manages people. The Free Press, New York 1995.Google Scholar
  13. [DeMa96]
    DeMarco, Tom: The Role of Software Development Methodologies: Past, Present, and Future. In: 18th International Conference on Software Engineering. March 25–29, 1996, Berlin, Germany. Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA 1996, S. 2-4.Google Scholar
  14. [DIEN94a]
    DIN, EN, ISO (Hrsg.): Normen zum Qualitätsmanagement und zur Qualitätssicherung/ QM-Darlegung. Teil 1: Leitfaden zur Auswahl und Anwendung. DIN EN ISO 9000-1: 1994-08. Beuth, Berlin 1994.Google Scholar
  15. [DIEN94b]
    DIN, EN, ISO (Hrsg.): Qualitätsmanagementsysteme. Modell zur Qualitätssicherung/ QM-Darlegung in Design/Entwicklung, Produktion, Montage und Wartung. DIN EN ISO 9001: 1994-08. Beuth, Berlin 1994.Google Scholar
  16. [DTBS92]
    Department of Trade and Industry, British Standards Institute (Hrsg.): TicklT — making a better job of Software. Guide to Software Quality Management System Construction and Certification using EN 29001. Issue 2.0. DISC TickIT Office, London, England 1992.Google Scholar
  17. [ElDr98]
    El Emam, Khaled; Drouin, Jean- Normand; Melo, Walcélio: SPICE The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA 1998.Google Scholar
  18. [FoFr97a]
    Fox, Christopher; Frakes, William: Elements of the Quality Paradigm. In: Communications of the ACM 40 (1997) 6, S. 26.Google Scholar
  19. [FoFr97b]
    Fox, Christopher; Frakes, William: The Quality Approach: Is It Delivering? In: Communications of the ACM 40 (1997) 6, S. 25–29.Google Scholar
  20. [Gerh92]
    Gerhardt, Tilmann: Strategie und Struktur in der deutschen Softwareindustrie. Eine industrieökonomische Untersuchung der Unternehmensentwicklung in der Softwarebranche. Verlag V. Florentz GmbH, München 1992.Google Scholar
  21. [Gibb94]
    Gibbs, W. Wayt: Trends in Computing. Software’s Chronic Crisis. In: Scientific American 43 (1994) 9, S. 72–81.Google Scholar
  22. [Gilb96]
    Gilb, Tom: Level 6: Why we can’t get there from here. In: IEEE Software 13 (1996) 1, S. 97–103.Google Scholar
  23. [GoHe95]
    Goldenson, Dennis; Herbsleb, James D.: After the Appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. Technical report CMU/SEI-95-TR-009. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 1995.Google Scholar
  24. [Grad97]
    Grady, Robert B.: Successful Software Process Improvement. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ 1997.Google Scholar
  25. [HaMe94]
    Haynes, Philip; Meyn, Stephan: Is ISO 9000 going to put you out of Business? In: American Programmer 7 (1994) 2, S. 25–29.Google Scholar
  26. [HaZu95]
    Hayes, Will; Zubrow, Dave: Moving on up: Data and Experience doing CMMBased Process Improvement. Technical Report. CMU/SEI-95-TR-008. ESC-TR-95–008. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 1995.Google Scholar
  27. [Herb94]
    Herbsleb, James et al.: Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results. Technical Report. CMU/SEI- 94-TR-13. ESC-TR-94-013. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 1994.Google Scholar
  28. [Herb97]
    Herbsleb, James et al.: Software Quality and the Capability Maturity Model. In: Communications of the ACM 40 (1997) 6, S. 30–40.Google Scholar
  29. [HuCu91]
    Humphrey, Watts S.; Curtis, Bill: Comments on ‘A critical look’. In: IEEE Software 8 (1991) 7, S. 42–46.Google Scholar
  30. [IaMa97]
    Iansiti, Marco; MacCormack, Alan: Developing Products on Internet Time. In: Harvard Business Review 75 (1997) 5, S. 108–117.Google Scholar
  31. [ISIE97]
    ISO/IEC (Hrsg.): ISO/IEC PDTR 15504. Software Process Assessment — Part 1: Concepts and Introductory Guide (SPICE V2.0). International Organization for Standardization, Genf 1997.Google Scholar
  32. [John95]
    Johnson, Jim: Creating Chaos. In: American Programmer 8 (1995) 7. S. 3–7.Google Scholar
  33. [Jone96]
    Jones, Capers: Patterns of Software Systems Failure and Success. International Thomson Computer Press, London, England 1996.Google Scholar
  34. [KuBi94]
    Kuvaja, P.; Bicego, A.: BOOTSTRAP — a European assessment methodology. In: Software Quality Journal 3 (1994) 3, S. 117–128.Google Scholar
  35. [Kuhn73]
    Kuhn, Thomas S.: Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1973.Google Scholar
  36. [LoSk95]
    Loken, Cecile B.; Skramstad, Torbjorn: ISO 9000 Certification — Experiences from Europe. In: American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) et al. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the First World Congress for Software Quality, June 202–22, 7995. ASQC, San Francisco, CA 1995, Session Y, S. 1–11.Google Scholar
  37. [Mats94]
    Matsubara, Tomoo: Does ISO 9000 really help improve Software Quality? In: American Programmer 7 (1994) 2, S. 38–45.Google Scholar
  38. [Ould96]
    Ould, Martyn A.: CMM and ISO 9001. In: Software Process — Improvement and Practice 2 (1996) 4, S. 281–289.Google Scholar
  39. [Paul93]
    Paulk, Mark C. et al.: Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Technical Report. CMU/SEI-93-TR-024. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 1993.Google Scholar
  40. [Paul95a]
    Paulk, Mark C.: How ISO 9001 compares with the CMM. In: IEEE Software 12 (1995) 1, S. 74–83.Google Scholar
  41. [Paul95b]
    Paulk, Mark C. et al.: The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1995.Google Scholar
  42. [Perr97]
    Perry, Tekla S.: In Search of The Future of Air Traffic Control. In: IEEE Spectrum 34 (1997) 8, S. 18–35.Google Scholar
  43. [Prok93]
    Prokesch, Steven E.: Mastering Chaos at the High-Tech Frontier: An Interview with Silicon Graphic’s Ed McCracken. In: Harvard Business Review 71 (1993) 6, S. 135–144.Google Scholar
  44. [SaCu94]
    Sanders, Joe; Curran, Eugene: Software Quality. A Framework for Success in Software Development and Support. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England 1994.Google Scholar
  45. [Spil94]
    Spillner, Andreas: Kann eine Krise 25 Jahre dauern? In: Informatik-Spektrum 17 (1994) 1, S. 48–52.Google Scholar
  46. [Stan95]
    The Standish Group International, Inc.: Chaos. Standish Group, Dennis, MA 1995.Google Scholar
  47. [StEn96]
    Stienen, Hans; Engelmann, Franz: Die BOOTSTRAP-Methode zur Bewertung und Verbesserung der Software-Entwicklung. In: WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 38 (1996) 6, S. 609–624.Google Scholar
  48. [StMe96]
    Stelzer, Dirk; Mellis, Werner; Herzwurm, Georg: Software Process Improvement via ISO 9000? Results of Two Surveys Among European Software Houses. In: Software Process — Improvement and Practice 2 (1996) 3, S. 197–210.Google Scholar
  49. [Taub97]
    Taube, Frank: Stand der kontinuierlichen Verbesserung in der Softwareentwicklung. Eine empirische Untersuchung bei Softwareunternehmen in Deutschland mit nach ISO 9001 zertifiziertem Qualitätsmanagementsystem. Diplomarbeit. Universität zu Köln, Köln 1997.Google Scholar
  50. [Thal93]
    Thaller, Georg Erwin: Qualitätsoptimierung in der Software-Entwicklung. Das Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Vieweg, Braunschweig 1993.Google Scholar
  51. [Thom95]
    Thomsett, Rob: Project Pathology: A Study of Project Failures. In: American Programmer 8 (1995) 7, S. 8–16.Google Scholar
  52. [Unge96]
    Ungermann, C. et al.: Qualitätsmanagement bei der Software-Erstellung. Leitfaden für die Umsetzung der DIN EN ISO 9000ff. VUI-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1996.Google Scholar
  53. [Wall95]
    Wallmüller, Ernest: Ganzheitliches Qualitätsmanagement in der Informationsverarbeitung. Hanser, München 1995.Google Scholar
  54. [Your95]
    Yourdon, Ed: Good Enough Software. In: Guerrilla Programmer 2 (1995) 4, S. 1–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SystementwicklungUniversität zu KölnKölnDeutschland

Personalised recommendations