, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 27–31 | Cite as

Gas reactivity testing of raw materials and anodes

  • Sheralyn M. Hume
  • Raymond C. Perruchoud
  • Werner K. Fischer
Aluminum Overview


In this article, development work on routine methods for efficient quality control that has been taking place over the last decade on gas reactivity testing of carbon materials is evaluated. The significance of coke reactivity data for raw material selection is examined, and the impact of the coke reactivity on the anode burning behavior is reviewed.


Briquette Ignition Temperature Round Robin International Standard Organization Petroleum Coke 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W.K. Fischer, “Lecture on Anodes” (Paper presented at the 8th International Course on Process Metallurgy of Aluminum,” Trondheim University, 1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.K. Fischer, G. Collin, and J.W. Stadelhofer, “Technischer Kohlenstoff Herstellung und Anwendung,” Tagungsbericht (Hamburg, Germany: DGMK Hamburg, 1990), p. 423.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.J. Houston and H.A. Øyeye, “Consumption of Anode Carbon During Aluminum Electrolysis,” Aluminum, 61(4), pp. 251ff; 61 (5), 346ff; 61 (6), 426ff (1985).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.J. Houston and H.A. Øye, “Carbon Losses Caused by Gaseous Oxidation During Aluminum Electrolysis,” Aluminum, 61(7), 493ff; 61 (8), 589ff (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.K. Fischer and R. Perruchoud, “Factors Influencing the Carboxy and Air Reactivity Behavior of Prebaked Anodes in Hall-Heroult Cells,” Light Metals 1986, ed. R.E. Miller (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1986), pp. 575–580.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Keller and W.K. Fischer, “Development of Anode Quality Criteria by Statistical Evaluation of Operational Results in the Electrolysis,” Light Metals 1982, ed. J.E. Andersen (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1982), pp. 729–740.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.A. Hollingshead and V.A. Braunwarth, “Laboratory Investigation of Carbon Anode Consumption in the Electrolytic Production of Aluminum,” Extractive Metallurgy of Aluminum: Vol. 2—Aluminum, ed. G. Gerard (New York: Interscience Publishers, 1963), pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Hume et al., “The Influence of Low Current Densities on Anode Performance,” Light Metals 1992, ed. E. Cutshall (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1992), pp. 687–692.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dr. U. Mannweiler, “Influence of Raw Materials on the Properties of Prebaked Anodes and Their Behavior in Hall-Heroult Cells” (Paper presented at the International Conference, Leningrad, Russia, 17-19 September 1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Perruchoud and W.K. Fischer, “Determination of the Sodium Sensitivity of Petroleum Coke,” Light Metals 1991, ed. E.L. Rooy (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1991), pp. 581–584.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.K. Fischer et al., “Baking Parameters and the Resulting Anode Quality,” Light Metals 1993, ed. S.K. Das (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1993), pp. 683–689.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B.H. Pippin, “The Production of Petroleum Coke for Aluminum Cell Anodes” (Paper presented at AIME Annual Meeting, New York, March 1971).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W.K. Fischer and R. Perruchoud, “Influence of Coke Calcining Parameters on Petroleum Coke Quality,” Light Metals 1985, ed. H.O. Bohner (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1985), pp. 811–826.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.T. Tonti and M.F. Vogt, “Better Coke Quality Through Calciner Computerization,” Light Metals 1987, ed. R.D. Zabreznik (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1987), pp. 519–524.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W.K. Fischer and R. Perruchoud, “Interdependence Between the Ignition Temperature and the Reactivity of Granular Carbon Materials,” Light Metals 1988, ed. L.G. Boxall (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1988), pp. 883–886.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Vitchus, “Specifications, Testing and Blending Considerations for Calcined Coke Supplies” (Paper presented at the Fourth Australasian Aluminum Smelter Technology Workshop, Sydney, Australia 25-30 October 1992).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W.K. Fischer, “Raw Materials for the Production of Prebaked Anodes,” (Paper presented at 3rd Australasian Aluminum Smelting Technology Course, 19-24 November 1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W.E. Blash, E.R. Cutshall, and P.A. Blair, “Studies Involving Air Reactivity of Petroleum Coke,” in Ref. 11, pp. 555-562.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Hume, “Influence of Raw Material Properties on the Reactivity of Carbon Anodes Used in the Electrolytic Production of Aluminum,” Ph.D thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand (1993).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W.K. Fischer, F. Keller, and R. Perruchoud, “Interdependence Between Anode Net Consumption and Pot Design, Pot Opera ting Parameters and Anode Properties,” in Ref. 10, pp. 681-686.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Z. de Mori, “Practical Experience with a Formula for the Prediction of the Anode Net Consumption,” in Ref. 11, pp. 563-567.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    W.K. Fischer and R. Perruchoud, “Determining Prebaked Anode Properties for Aluminum Production,” J. Metals, 39(11) (1987), pp. 43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Hume et al., “A Model for Petroleum Coke Reactivity,” in Ref. 11, pp. 525-531.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.E. Gehlach and J.T. Gee, “Oxidation of Calcined Petroleum Cokes,” Light Metals 1985, ed. H.O. Bohner (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1985).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. Milani and J. Melendi, “Air Reactivity Studies on Calcined Petroleum Coke,” in Ref. 8, pp. 641-647.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Rey Boero, “Studies on Anode Reactivity to Oxidant Gases,” Light Metals 1981, ed. Gordon M. Bell (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1981), pp. 441–458.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    L. Lavigne and L. Castonguay, “Prediction of Anode Performance from Calcined Coke Properties,” in Ref. 11, pp. 569-575.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. Schmidt-Hatting, A. Kooijman and R. Perruchoud, “Investigation of the Quality of Recycled Anode Butts,” in Ref. 10, pp. 705-720.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Muftuoglu, B. Steine, and R. Fernandez, “Anode Burning Behavior and Sodium Sensitivity of Coke from Different Feedstocks: A Pilot Scale Study,” in Ref. 8, pp. 543-548.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    W.K. Fischer and R. Perruchoud, “Interdependence Between Properties of Anode Butts and Quality of Prebaked Anodes,” in Ref. 10, pp. 721-724.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheralyn M. Hume
    • 1
  • Raymond C. Perruchoud
    • 2
  • Werner K. Fischer
    • 2
  1. 1.Comalco Research CentreThomastownAustralia
  2. 2.R&D Carbon Ltd.Switzerland

Personalised recommendations