Microstructure and mechanical properties of Sn-In and Sn-Bi solders
- 261 Downloads
This article presents information that helps to clarify the behavior of lead-free, low-melting, eutectic Sn-In and Sn-Bi solders. The Sn-Bi solder forms a well-defined eutectic microstructure at all solidification rates, while Sn-In solder forms an irregular eutectic that changes to a fine-grained two-phase mixture at high solidification rates. Both solders wet copper by forming tin-containing intermetallics; however, Sn-In forms Sn-In-Cu intermetallics with copper and Au-In intermetallics with gold. The steady-state creep behavior of Sn-In and Sn-Bi roughly resembles that of Sn-Pb with similar microstructures. Sn-Bi further resembles Sn-Pb in that its eutectic microstructure recrystallizes within inhomogeneous shear bands. This is not observed in Sn-In. Both Sn-Bi and Sn-In exhibit pronounced strain softening during shear deformation and show early transitions to tertiary creep. Shear stress-strain behavior at normal temperatures and moderate strain rates is governed by creep; the ultimate shear stress can be inferred from the steady-state creep behavior.
KeywordsShear Band Solder Joint Tertiary Creep Eutectic Microstructure Ultimate Shear Stress
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R.J.K. Wassink, Soldering in Electronics, 2nd ed. (Ayr, Scotland: Electrochemical Publications Limited, 1989), p. 196.Google Scholar
- 2.C. Lea, A Scientific Guide to Surface Mount Technology (Ayr, Scotland: Electrochemical Publications Limited, 1988), p. 171.Google Scholar
- 3.R. Kubiak, M. Wolcyrz, and W. Zacharko, J. Less-Common Met., 65 (1979), p. 263.Google Scholar
- 4.J.L. Freer and J.W. Morris, jr., Electronic Mater., 21 (1992), p. 647.Google Scholar
- 5.A.D. Romig, Jr., F.G. Yost, and P.F. Hlava, Microbeam Analysis—1984, ed. A.D. Romig and J.I. Goldstein (San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Press, 1984), p. 87.Google Scholar
- 6.Z. Mei and J.W. Morris, Jr., J. Electronic Mater., 21 (1992), p. 401.Google Scholar