, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 20–26 | Cite as

The mathematical modeling of leaching systems

  • Ernest Peters
Pressure Leaching Tutorial


Leaching processes may be described by two kinds of models—a micromodel that deals with changes to solid particles while they undergo leaching and a macromodel that deals with system changes. This article presents the micromodel by writing a general mathematical equation for single particle leaching, integrating this equation over all initial particle sizes and integrating over the residence time distribution applicable to the leaching system. The macromodel deals with material and heat balances and utilizes surface area integrals arising from the micromodel. The result is an overall model that describes both batch and continuous leaching in stirred tanks, and which may be expanded to include heap and dump leaching.


Leaching Continuous Stir Tank Reactor Residence Time Distribution Micromodel Pulp Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Octave Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2nd ed. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Harriott, “Mass Transfer to Particles: Part I: Suspended in Agitated Tanks,” A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 8 (March 1962), pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.E. Wadsworth, “Rate Processes in Extractive Metallurgy,” Hydrometallurgical Processes, ed. H.Y. Sohn and M.E. Wadsworth (New York: Plenum Press, 1979), pp. 142ff.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Rosin and E. Rammler, J. Inst. Fuel, 7 (1933), pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Schuhmann, “Principles of Comminution 1. Size Distribution and Surface Calculations,” AIME Tech. Paper #1189, Mining Tech. (1940).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Epstein, “Logarithmico-Normal Distribution in Breakage of Solids,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 40 (1948), pp. 2289–2291. See also (original reference) Hatch & Choate, J. Franklin Inst., 207 (1929), p. 369.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.M. Gaudin and T.P. Meloy, AIME Trans., 223 (1962), pp. 43–43.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.B. Dreisinger et al., Lead Zinc ’90, ed. T.S. Mackey and R.D. Prengaman (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1990), pp. 313–334.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.H. Taylor and Whelan, Bull. I.M.M. (January 1942; January, July and November 1943). See also (private communication) Jacobson et al., “Economic Evaluation of Heap Leaching” (Laramie, WY: In-Situ, Inc., 1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© TMS 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernest Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations