The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 37–60 | Cite as

New times, new ways? Methodological problems in researching the nintendo generation

  • Jo-Anne Reid


Computer Game Game Play Educational Researcher Moral Panic Electronic Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alloway, N. and Gilbert, P. (1997)Boys and Literacy, The Curriculum Corporation, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  2. Alloway, N. and Gilbert, P. (1998) Video Game culture; Playing with masculinity, violence and pleasure, in S. Howard ed,Wired Up: Young People and the Electronic Media, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
  3. Apperley, A. (1997) Foucault and the problem of method, in M. Lloyd and A. Thacker eds,The Impact of Michel Foucault on the Social Sciences and Humanities, Macmillan, London., pp. 10–28.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Association of Research in Education (1995)Code of Ethics for Research in Education (Revised), Coldstream.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1977)Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1992) Thinking about Limits,Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 9, no. 1, Feb. pp. 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1992a) The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris Workshop), in P. Bourdieu and L. D. Wacquant,An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 217–260.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992)An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
  9. Comber, B. and Green, B. (1998)Information technology, literacy and educational disadvantage. Project funded by the South Australian Department of Education and Training (work in progress).Google Scholar
  10. Connelly, P. and Troyna, B. (1998)Researching Racism in Education, The Open University Press, Buckingham and Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  11. de Certeau, M. (1984)The Practice of Everyday Life, University of California Press, California and London.Google Scholar
  12. Eisner, E. W. (1997) The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation,Educational Researcher, vol, 26, no. 6, pp. 4–10.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1997)Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  14. Gee, J. P. (1991) What is literacy? in C. Mitchell and K. Weiler eds,Rewriting Literacy, Bergin & Garvey, New York, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  15. Green, B. (1994/1995) Aliens and their others,Metro Magazine, no. 100, Summer, pp. 68–75.Google Scholar
  16. Green, B. and Bigum, C. (1993) Aliens in the classroom,Australian Journal of Education, vol. 37, no. 2, pp 119–141.Google Scholar
  17. Green, B., Reid, J-A. and Bigum, C. (1998) Teaching the Nintendo generation? Children, computing and popular culture, in Sue Howard ed.Wired Up: Young People and the Electronic Media, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar
  18. Heron, J. (1981) Experimental research methods, in P. Reason and J. Rowan eds,Human Inquiry, John Wiley, New York, pp. 153–16.Google Scholar
  19. Hopkins, J. (1997) Ethical Issues in Research Involving Children. Unpublished paper, University of Ballarat.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, H. (1993) ‘x Logic’: Repositioning Nintendo in children’s lives,Quarterly Review of Film and Video, vol 14, pp. 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamler, B., Maclean, R., Reid, J-A. and Simpson, A. (1994)Shaping Up Nicely: The Formation of Schoolgirls and Schoolboys in the First Month of School, Australian Government Printing Service, DEET, Canberra.Google Scholar
  22. Ladwig, J. (1996)Academic Distinctions: Theory and Methodology in the Sociology of School Knowledge, Routledge, New York and London.Google Scholar
  23. Lather, P. (1991)Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern, Routledge, New York and London.Google Scholar
  24. Lloyd, M. and Thacker, A. (1997) Introduction: Strategies of transgression, in M. Lloyd and A. Thacker eds,The Impact of Michel Foucault on the Social Sciences and Humanities, Macmillan, London, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  25. Luke, A. (1992) The social construction of literacy in the primary school, in L. Unsworth ed,Literacy in the Primary School, Macmillan, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. Luke, A. (1998) Getting over method: Literacy teaching as work in ‘New Times’,Language Arts, vol. 75, no. 4.Google Scholar
  27. MacRobbie, A. and Thornton, S. L. (1996) Rethinking ‘moral panic’ for multi-mediated social worlds,British Journal of Sociology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGregor, A. (1993) Nintendo rules, OK!Good Weekend, October 16, pp. 28–33 [The Age supplement].Google Scholar
  29. Mortensen, P. and Kirsch, G. E. eds (1996)Ethics & Representation in Qualitative Studies of Literacy, NCTE, Urbana.Google Scholar
  30. Papert, S. (1993)The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Polanyi, M. (1967)The Tacit Dimension, Anchor Books, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Reid, J-A. (1999,) Little women/little men: Gender, violence and embodiment in an early childhood classroom, in B. Kamler ed,Constructing Gender and Difference: Critical Research Perspectives on Early Childhood, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. Reid, J-A., Kamler, B., Simpson, A. and Maclean, R. (1996) Do you see what I see? Reading a different classroom scene,Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodda, E. (1994)Power and Glory, Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, NSW.Google Scholar
  35. Sanger, J. with Willson, J., Davies, B. and Whittaker, R. (1997)Young Children, Videos and Computer Games: Issues for Teachers and Parents, The Falmer Press, London and Washington DC.Google Scholar
  36. Sharp, R. and Green, A. (1975)Education and Social Control: A Study in Progressive Primary Education, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, D. E. (1987) The everyday world as problematic: A feminist methodology, in D. E. SmithThe Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology, Northeastern University Press, Boston, pp. 105–145.Google Scholar
  38. Walkerdine, V. (1997) A question of method, in V. WalkerdineDaddy’s Girl: Young girls and Popular Culture, Macmillan, London, pp. 45–77.Google Scholar
  39. Whittaker, R. (1995)Adult-free zones: Children and entertainment technology Journal, vol. 20, issue 3, Autumn, pp. 35–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo-Anne Reid
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New EnglandAustralia

Personalised recommendations