Advertisement

The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 21–36 | Cite as

Policy and practice in gifted education

  • Jill Forster
Article

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to investigate how policy has become practice in the area of gifted education in the New South Wales government school system. In general, it was a heuristic study of the articulation of policy and practice.

A conceptual framework applied to the policy process was used to consider the extent to which the policy intent was realised. At each level of the policy process perceptions and practice were revealed through interviews, documents, content analyses and, in addition, at the school level, through questionnaires as part of a case study approach.

The study clarified and gave validity to general assumptions in the areas of policy-making and gifted education. Findings showed that providing for gifted and talented children was not a priority, was not systematic and was not routine. Specifics were lacking through the policy process, resulting in the ad hoc nature of provision for gifted children which varied according to individual initiatives. As the then Minister for Education saw it, the situation was ‘a pepper pot of exciting activities alongside inaction (Metherell 1989).

Keywords

Policy Process South Wale Administrative Level Strategic Level Policy Intent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian Council for Educational Research (1991),The Effective Schools Project, ACER Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Baumgart, N.L. (1985),Education. A Map for Introductory Courses, Sydney, Ian Novak.Google Scholar
  3. Bowd, A. (1986),Exceptional Children in Class, Melbourne, Hargreen Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, W.L. (1978), ‘The Study of Educational Policy and Politics: Much Ado about Nothing?’Teachers College Record, 80(2), pp. 249–270.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, D.K. (1987), ‘Educational Technology, Policy, and Practice’,Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), pp. 153–170.Google Scholar
  6. Commonwealth of Australia (1988),Report by the Senate Select committee on the Education of Gifted and Talented Children, Canberra.Google Scholar
  7. Commonwealth Schools Commission and Commonwealth Tertiary Education (1986),Improving Teacher Education. Report of the Joint Review of Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  8. Cook T.J. and Scioli, F.P. (1972), ‘A Research Strategy for Analysing the Impacts of Public Policy’,Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), pp. 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eagan, C.B. (1986),The Gifted Child in the Regular Classroom: Inservice Programme for the Classroom Teacher. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Council of States on Inservice Education, Nashville.Google Scholar
  10. Hawley, W.D. (1977), ‘If Schools are for Learning’, in J.D. Scribner (ed.),The Politics of Education, the Seventy-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Higgins, S. and Barresi, J. (1979), ‘The Changing Focus of Public Policy’,Exceptional Children, 45, pp. 270–277.Google Scholar
  12. Hogan, M. and West, P. (1980),Making Policy in a Changing Context: The Education Policy Process in New South Wales. Monograph No. 2 of the Education Policy Process at State Level: an Australian-United States Comparative Study Project, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville.Google Scholar
  13. Holsti, D.R. (1969),Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Massachussetts, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. Horowitz, F.D. and O’Brien, M. (ed.) (1985),The Gifted and Talented Developmental Perspectives, Washington, D.C., American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  15. Jantsch, E. (ed.) (1969),Perspectives of Planning, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
  16. Joyce, B. (1985), ‘Models for Teaching Thinking’,Educational Leadership, 42(8), pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
  17. Kerr, D.H. (1976),Educational Policy: Analysis, Structure and Justification, New York, David McKay.Google Scholar
  18. Knight, J. (1987),Policy in the Development of National Educational Systems in the Asia and Pacific Regions, Ph.D. Thesis, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
  19. MacDonald, C. (1983), ‘The Education of the Talented in the Comprehensive School’,First National Conference on the Education of gifted and Talented Children, Melbourne, Commonwealth Schools Commission, pp. 279–286.Google Scholar
  20. Marland, S.P. (1972),Education of the Gifted and Talented. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education, Washington D.C., Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Meeker, M. (1987),The Next Challenge in Gifted Education, Speech given at the Conference of the California Association for the Gifted.Google Scholar
  22. Millikan, R.H. (1987), ‘The Politically-expedient Model of Policy-making’,Unicorn, 13(1), pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell, P.B. and Erickson, D.K. (1979), ‘The Education of Gifted and Talented Children: A Status Report’,Exceptional Children, 45, pp. 12–16.Google Scholar
  24. New South Wales Department of Education (1977),Report of the Survey on the Education of Highly Talented Children, Centre for Research in Learning and Instruction. Unpublished document.Google Scholar
  25. New South Wales Department of Education (1979–89),Readings on the Education of the Talented Child.Google Scholar
  26. New South Wales Department of Education (1983),The Education of Children with Special Talents. General Policy Statement, Sydney.Google Scholar
  27. New South Wales Department of Education (1986),District Inspectors Survey. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  28. New South Wales Government (1991),New South Wales Government Strategy for the Education of Gifted and Talented Students.Google Scholar
  29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1977),Country Projects: Synthesis and Evaluation, Vol. 1, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
  30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1977),Education Policies and Trends. A Report by a Group of Experts, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
  31. Povey, R.H. (ed.) (1980),Educating the Gifted Child, London, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  32. Power, C. (1985), ‘Research on Innovation’, in N.L. Baumgart (ed.),Education. A Map for Introductory Courses, Sydney, Ian Novak.Google Scholar
  33. Rankin, D. (1989), ‘Policy and Practice: Brisbane South Gifted Education Teachers’ Kit’, paper presented at the 8th World conference on Gifted and Talented Children, Sydney.Google Scholar
  34. Sadler, D.R. (1985), ‘Evaluation, Policy Analysis and Multiple Case Studies. Aspects of Focus and Sampling’,Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(2), pp. 143–149.Google Scholar
  35. Schneider, J.A., Stevens, N.J. and Tornatzky, L.G. (1982), ‘Policy Research and Analysis: an Empirical Profile 1975–1980’,Policy Sciences, 15(2), pp. 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scott, B. (1989),Schools Renewal Strategy to Revitalise Schools within the New South Wales State Education System, Management Review, Milsons Point.Google Scholar
  37. Scribner, J.D. (1977),The Politics of Education, The Seventy-sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Shellard, J.S. (ed.) (1979),Educational Research for Policy-making in Australia, Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd., Hawthorn, Victoria.Google Scholar
  39. Sinclair, R. and Bailey, S. (1989), ‘Opinions on the Education of Gifted and Talented Students: Some Preliminary Australian Data’, Paper presented at the 8th World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children, Sydney.Google Scholar
  40. Stake, R.E. (1978), ‘The Case Method in Social Inquiry’,Educational Researcher, 7, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar
  41. Vernon, P.E. (ed.) (1970),Creativity, Ringwood, Victoria, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  42. Wiersma, W. (1986),Research Methods in Education. An Introduction, Sydney, Allyn and Bacon, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jill Forster

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations