Conclusion
Well, colleagues, I have demonstrated that AARE was born into optimism in the early 1970s and that alas, it lost its way in the wilderness of economic rationalism and despair in the 1980s. I am aware that the pall of gloom of the 1980s is still with us. However, I hope that several of the strategies which I have advocated — especially those of the permanent secretariat and the national research agenda may prove to be the light at the end of that long tunnel which stretches into the 1990s. I leave it to some future President to assess, with the benefit of historical hindsight, whether any of these suggested strategies were adopted and proved successful. I leave it to her, too, to declare whether it was in fact the light at the end of the tunnel which I saw or merely another metaphorical steam train bearing down on our troubled Association.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Education Researcher, 1973–1990.
Aitkin, D. (1990) ‘How Research Came to Dominate Higher Education and What Ought to be Done About It’, Lecture at Leeds Polytechnic, 3 May.
Boyd, William Lowe and Smart, Don (1987)Education Policy in Australia and America, London, Falmer Press.
Ebbeck, Fred (1990)Teacher Education in Australia: Report to the Australian Education Council, AEC, Melbourne.
Harman, Grant and Smart, Don (1982)Federal Intervention in Australian Education, Melbourne, Georgian House.
Smart, Don (1990) ‘The Dawkins Reconstruction of Australian Higher Education’,Education Research and Perspectives, Vol 17, No 2, December, pp. 11–22.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smart, D. Into the third decade: Some suggested strategies for AARE in the 1990s. Aust. Educ. Res. 18, 17–29 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219482
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219482