Teachers’ attitudes towards proof of mathematical results in the secondary school curriculum: The case of zimbabwe
- 114 Downloads
This study investigated teachers’ attitudes towards proofs in the secondary school mathematics curriculum. The study was motivated by a desire to fill a gap existing in the literature in relation to teachers’ attitudes towards proofs. Thirty-four secondary school mathematics teachers’ responses to a Likert type questionnaire and interviews were summarised using the five themes of utility, positive attitudes, methods of proof, negative attitudes, and suitability of level of students to perform proofs. The teachers expressed neutral attitudes on technology as a method of proof and disagreed that verbal proof was a valid method for proving the viability of mathematical claims. The implications of the results are discussed using the context of Zimbabwean classrooms with a view to promote debate on how teachers could implement learner-centred reform.
KeywordsMathematics Teacher Mathematical Knowledge Mathematical Result Argumentation Skill Secondary School Mathematics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boone, W. J. (2006, January).Designing and analyzing mathematics/science surveys and tests in Ohio. Paper presented at the 14th South African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education annual conference. University of Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
- Brumbaugh, D. K., & Rock, D. (2001).Teaching secondary mathematics. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Davis, R. B. (1990). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Mahler, & N. Noddings (Eds.),Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 1–6). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
- Hana, G. (1996). The ongoing value of proof. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.),Proceedings of the 20th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 21–34). Valencia, Spain: PME. Retrieved 8 April, 2002, from http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca~ghanna/pme96prf.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Knuth, E. J. (2002). Proof as a tool for learning mathematics.Mathematics Teacher, 95 (7), 486–490.Google Scholar
- Mudaly, V. (1999). Who said that proof was boring?Proceedings of the 7th SAARMSE conference (pp. 303–308). Harare, South Africa: SAARMSE.Google Scholar
- Nyaumwe, L. J. (2004). The impact of full time student teaching on pre-service teachers’ conceptions of mathematics teaching and learning.Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 6, 23–36.Google Scholar
- Nyaumwe, L. J. (2006). Investigating Zimbabwean mathematics teachers’ dispositions on the ‘O’ Level calculator syllabus.South African Journal of Education, 26 (1), 39–47.Google Scholar
- Warren, E., & Nisbet, S. (2000). Factors in primary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and teaching and learning mathematics. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.),Mathematics education beyond 2000 (Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 632–639). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar