# Strategies employed by upper secondary students for overcoming or exploiting conditions affecting accessibility of applications tasks

- 96 Downloads
- 8 Citations

## Abstract

A cognitive/metacognitive framework is presented for analysing applications tasks and responses to these. Conditions facilitating or impeding access to such tasks at the upper secondary level were identified using qualitative data analysis techniques within this framework. Strategies employed in exploiting, or overcoming these conditions were identified. A well-developed repertoire of cognitive and metacognitive strategies together with a rich store of mathematical knowledge, real-world knowledge and experiences, and comprehension skills facilitated access. This was enhanced by metacognitive knowledge encouraging student engagement with the task and by students imagining they were in the task situation. Once moderate skill had been achieved in accessing these applications, coordination and integration of multiple representations, further cues, and mathematical processes and procedures became critical.

## Keywords

Cognitive Activity Perceptual Condition Secondary Student Metacognitive Knowledge Metacognitive Strategy## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Amit, M. (1994). Assessment in mathematics — past, present and future. In R. Peard & L. English (Eds.),
*New directions in assessment of mathematics*(Proceedings of the 4th annual conference on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp. 1–17). Brisbane: Centre for Mathematics and Science Education, QUT.Google Scholar - Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In W. K. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),
*The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory*(Vol. 1, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Baddeley, A. (1997).
*Human memory: Theory and practice*(Rev. ed.). Hove, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar - Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects — state, trends and issues in mathematics instruction.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22*, 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bourne, L. F., Dominowski, R. G., Loftus, E. F., & Healy, A. F. (1986).
*Cognitive processes*(2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar - Broadbent, D. (1987). Simple experiments for experimentable situations. In P. Morris (Ed.),
*Modelling cognition*(pp. 169–186). London, England: Wiley.Google Scholar - Bruer, J. T. (1993).
*Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar - Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2003). Context in application and modelling: An empirical approach. In Q. Ye, W. Blum, I. D. Huntley & N. T. Neil (Eds.),
*Mathematical modelling in education and culture*(pp. 95–107). Chichester, UK: Horwood.Google Scholar - Carlson, R. A., Khoo, B. H., Yaure, R. G., & Schneider, W. (1990). Acquisition of a problem-solving skill: Levels of organization and use of working memory.
*Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119*(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Carlson, R. A., Sullivan, M. A., & Schneider, W. (1989). Practice and working memory effects in building procedural skill.
*Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15*, 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction.
*Cognition and Instruction, 8*, 293–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cooper, B. (1998). Assessing national curriculum mathematics in England: Exploring children’s interpretation of key stage 2 tests in clinical interviews.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35*(1), 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ekol, G. (2004). Mathematical modelling: Country experience Uganda. In H. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.),
*Proceedings of International Congress of Mathematics Instruction Study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education*(Pre-conference volume, pp. 77–82). Dortmund, Germany: ICMI.Google Scholar - Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.
*American Psychologist, 34*, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.),
*Metacognition, motivation and understanding*(pp. 21–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Fong, H. K. (1994). Information Processing Taxonomy (IPT): An alternative technique for assessing mathematical problem-solving.
*Singapore Journal of Education, 14*(1), 31–45.Google Scholar - Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39*, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Greer, B., & Verschaffel, L. (Eds.) (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms.
*Learning and Instruction, 7*(4). [Special issue].Google Scholar - Kadijevich, D. (1999). What may be neglected by an application-centred approach to mathematics education? A personal view.
*Nordisk Matematikk Didaktikk (Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education), 7*(1), 29–39.Google Scholar - Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight.
*Cognitive Psychology, 22*, 374–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
*Psychological Review, 95*(2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behaviour. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.),
*Metacognition, motivation, and understanding*(pp. 31–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Krutetskii, V. A. (1969). An analysis of the individual structure of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. In J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup (Eds.),
*Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics: Vol. 2. The structure of mathematical abilities*(pp. 59–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. (Original work published 1962)Google Scholar - Krutetskii, V. A. (1976).
*The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren*. (J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup (Eds.),. J. Teller, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. (Original work published 1968)Google Scholar - Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: An exploratory look through a class lens.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31*(4), 454–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Masingila, J. O., Davidenko, S., & Prus-Wisniowska, E. (1996). Mathematics learning and practice in and out of school: A framework for connecting these experiences.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31*, 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mayer, R. (1983).
*Thinking, problem solving, cognition*. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar - Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994).
*Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook*(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar - Monsell, S. (1984). Components of working memory underlying verbal skills: A “distributed capacities” approach. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhis (Eds.),
*Attention and performance X*(pp. 327–350). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. (1992). A theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for the design of learning environments.
*Cognition and Instruction, 9*(4), 329–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pea, R. (1987). Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.),
*Cognitive science and mathematics education*(pp. 89–122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Peirce, B. N., & Stein, P. (1995). Why the “Monkeys Passage” bombed: Tests, genres, and teaching.
*Harvard Educational Review, 65*(1), 50–65.Google Scholar - Pollak, H. O. (1997). Solving problems in the real world. In L. A. Steen (Ed.),
*Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America*(pp. 91–105). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar - Prus-Wisniowska, E. (1993).
*Examining mathematics practice in restaurant management*. Research Apprenticeship Report. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University.Google Scholar - Qualitative Solutions and Research (1997). Non-numerical Unstructured Data *Indexing Searching and Theorizing (NUD*IST) v.4 [Computer Software]. Melbourne: Qualitative Solutions and Research.Google Scholar
- Queensland Board of Senior Secondary School Studies (QBSSSS). (1992).
*Senior mathematics B syllabus*. Brisbane: Author.Google Scholar - Queensland Board of Senior Secondary School Studies (QBSSSS). (2000).
*Mathematics B: Senior syllabus 2001*. Brisbane: Author.Google Scholar - Reusser, K., & Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution: The suspension of reality and sense-making in the culture of school mathematics.
*Learning and Instruction, 7*, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Roulet, G., & Surrtamm, C. (2004). Modelling: Subject images and teacher practice. In H. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.),
*Proceedings of International Congress of Mathematics Instruction Study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education*(Pre-conference volume, pp. 229–234). Dortmund, Germany: ICMI.Google Scholar - Schneider, W., & Detweiler, M. (1987). A connectionist/control architecture for working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),
*The psychology of learning and motivation*(Vol. 21, pp. 54–119). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar - Schneider, W., & Detweiler, M. (1988). The role of practice in dual-task performance: Toward workload modelling in a connectionist/control architecture.
*Human Factors, 30*, 539–566.Google Scholar - Smith, R., & Hurst, J. (1990). Accident investigations. In I. D. Huntley & D. J. G. James (Eds.),
*Mathematical modelling: A sourcebook of case studies*(pp. 67–80). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Stillman, G. (1998). Task context and applications at the senior secondary level. In C. Kanes, M. Goos & E. Warren (Eds.),
*Teaching mathematics in new times*(Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 564–571). Gold Coast: MERGA.Google Scholar - Stillman, G. (1999). Accessibility of applications tasks. In J. M. Truran & K. M. Truran (Eds.),
*Making the difference*(Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 454–461). Adelaide: MERGA.Google Scholar - Stillman, G. (2000). Impact of prior knowledge of task context on approaches to applications tasks.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19*(3), 333–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stillman, G. (2002).
*Assessing higher order mathematical thinking through applications*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland.Google Scholar - Stillman, G. A., & Galbraith, P. L. (1998). Applying mathematics with real world connections: Metacognitive characteristics of secondary students.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics 36*(2), 157–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990).
*Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques*. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar - Sweller, J. (1992). Cognitive theories and their implications for mathematics instruction. In G. Leder (Ed.),
*Assessment and learning of mathematics*(pp. 46–62). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar - Taylor, J. C. (1991). Designing instruction to generate expert cognitive skill performance: Empirical evidence. In G. Evans (Ed.),
*Learning and teaching cognitive skills*(pp. 164–184). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar - Tesch, R. (1990).
*Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools*. New York, NY: Falmer.Google Scholar - Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?
*American Psychologist, 40*(4), 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1999). Context problems and assessment: Ideas from the Netherlands. In I. Thompson (Ed.),
*Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools*, (pp. 130–142). Buckingham, UK: Open University.Google Scholar - Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Vierstraete, H. (1999). Upper elementary school pupils’ difficulties in modeling and solving nonstandard additive word problems involving ordinal numbers.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30*(3), 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000).
*Making sense of word problems*. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar - Voigt, J. (1998). The culture of the mathematics classroom: Negotiating the mathematical meaning of empirical phenomena. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt & U. Waschescio (Eds.),
*The culture of the mathematics classroom*(pp. 191–220). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yoshida, H., Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Realistic considerations in solving problematic word problems. Do Japanese and Belgian children have the same difficulties?
*Learning and Instruction, 7*(4), 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wagenaar, W. A. (1986). My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years.
*Cognitive Psychology, 18*, 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Williams, G. (2002). Developing a shared understanding of task complexity. In L. Bazzini & C. Whybrow Inchley (Eds.),
*Mathematical literacy in the digital era: Research and classroom practice aiming at mathematics education for all. Proceedings of the 53rd conference of the International Commission for the Study and Improvement of mathematics Teaching (CIEAEM)*(pp. 263–268). Milano, Italy: Ghisetti e Corvi Edirori.Google Scholar - Wistedt, I., & Martinsson, M. (1996). Orchestrating a mathematical theme: Elevenyear olds discuss the problem of infinity.
*Learning and Instruction, 6*(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar