Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

An exploration of gender differences in tertiary mathematics

  • Jane M. Watson


Data from 400 students in a tertiary mathematics course were analysed to explore gender differences on a number of variables associated with learning mathematics. It was concluded that while differences did occur on variables associated with confidence, self-concept, test anxiety and quantitative ability indicating a detrimental effect for women, compensating behaviour by women, including increased assignment work and tutorial attendance, resulted in comparable final course performance for women and men. These findings are discussed in light of participation rates of women in mathematics.


Test Anxiety Tertiary Level Mathematical Ability Mathematics Anxiety Explore Gender Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott-Chapman, J., Hughes, P., & Wyld, C. (1986).The Identification and Development of Intellectual Ability. Report — Volume 1. Hobart: Centre for Education, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, R.J. (1985). Sex and background factors: Effect on ASAT scores.Australian Journal of Education, 29, 221–230.Google Scholar
  3. Aiken, L.R. (1974). Two scales of attitude towards mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alpert, R., & Haber, R.N. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Council for Educational Research. (1955).Manual for ACER Advanced Test AL-AQ. Hawthorne, Victoria: Author.Google Scholar
  6. Badger, M.E. (1981). Why aren’t girls better at maths? A review of Research.Educational Research, 24, 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brookover, W.B., LePere, J.M., Hamachek, D.E., Thomas, S., & Erickson, E.L. (1965).Self-Concept of Ability and School Achievement, II. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  8. Brush, L. (1979).Encouraging Girls in Mathematics: The Problem and Solution. Cambridge MA: Abt Associates Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dekkers, H., Malone, J., de Laeter, J.R., & Hamlett, B. (1982). Mathematics enrolment patterns in Australian secondary schools: Male — female trends.Australian Mathematics Teacher, 38 (4), 7–10.Google Scholar
  10. Fennema, E. & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors.American Educational Research Journal, 14, 51–71.Google Scholar
  11. Fennema, E. & Sherman, J. (1978). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keller, F.S. (1968). Good-bye teacher.Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 1, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leder, G.C. (1982) Mathematics achievement and fear of success.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marsh, H.W., Smith, I.D., & Barnes, J. (1984). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relationships with sex and academic achievement. InAARE National Conference, Collected Papers Volume 2, Research and Educational Futures: Technology, Development and Educational Futures (pp. 596–606). Perth: AARE.Google Scholar
  15. Meece, J.L., Parsons, J.E., Kaczala, CM., Goff, S.B., & Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice.Psychological Bulletin, 91, 324–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perl, T.H. (1982). Discriminating factors and sex differences in electing mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Richardson, F.C., & Woolfolk, R.L. (1980). Mathematics anxiety. In I.G. Sarason (Ed.),Test Anxiety: Theory, Research and Applications (pp.271–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Rowe, K.J. (1988). Single-sex and mixed-sex classes: The effects of class type on student achievement, confidence and participation in mathematics.Australian Journal of Education, 32, 180–202.Google Scholar
  19. Sarason, I.G. (Ed.). (1980).Test Anxiety: Theory, Research and Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. SPSSX User’s Guide. (1986). (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc. and McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  21. Watson, J.M. (1982). Individualized mathematics instruction in an Australian University (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, 1982.)Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 2268A. (University Microfilms’ No. 82-29, 205).Google Scholar
  22. Watson, J.M. (1986a). The Keller Plan, final examinations, and long-term retention.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Watson, J.M. (1986b). The effect of method of instruction on long-term retention of mathematics concepts.Higher Education Research and Development, 5, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watson, J.M. (1988). The Achievement Anxiety Scale: Dimensionality and utility.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 585–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson, B.A. (1986). Where have all the women gone?Australian Physicist, 23, 219–221.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane M. Watson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TasmaniaAustralia

Personalised recommendations