Bezafibrate fails to directly modulate HMG-CoA reductase or LDL catabolism in human mononuclear cells
- 15 Downloads
The effect of bezafibrate on HMG-CoA reductase, the key enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, and LDL metabolism was studied in human mononuclear cells. Bezafibrate at concentrations achieved during administration in patients did not suppress preformed reductase in mononuclear cells. Similarly, the drug was ineffective in regulating reductase when added to the medium of cultured cells. Also, the fibrate did not modulate the enzyme suppression mediated by LDL. At very high concentrations bezafibrate enhanced LDL binding, but both total cell association and degradation were unchanged. Thus, the previously observed decrease of HMG-CoA reductase activity in mononuclear cells of patients treated with fibrates is likely to be indirect and probably due to changes in LDL structure.
KeywordsCholesterol synthesis 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl CoA reductase mononuclear cells fibrate
- 1.Vessby B, Lithell H, Hellsing K, Östlund-Lindqvist A-M, Gustafsson I-B, Boberg J, Ledermann H (1980) Effects of bezafibrate on the serum lipoprotein lipid and apolipoprotein composition, lipoprotein triglyceride removal capacity and the fatty acid composition of the plasma lipid esters. Atherosclerosis 37: 257–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Frick MH, Elio O, Haapa K, Heinonen OP, Heinsalmi P, Helo P, Huttunen JK, Kaitaniemi P, Koskinen P, Manninen V, Mäenpää H, Mälkönen M, Mänttäri M, Norola S, Pasternack A, Pikkarainen J, Romo M, Sjöblom T, Nikkilä EA (1987) Helsinki heart study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med 317: 1237–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Stahlberg D, Reihner E, Ewerth S, Einarsson K, Angelin B (1990) Effects of bezafibrane on hepatic cholesterol metabolism. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (this issue)Google Scholar
- 23.Stange EF, Dietschy JM (1984) Age-related decreases in tissue sterol acquisition are mediated by changes in cholesterol synthesis and not low density lipoprotein uptake in the rat. J Lipid Res 35: 703–713Google Scholar