WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 449–465 | Cite as

Discourse of maritime forms (Check lists)

  • Milena Dževerdanović


Check lists represent a very important tool within the International Safety Management Code, aimed at the regular and thorough assessment of the safety on board ships along with the operation of their parent companies. There seems to be only a few academic articles studying the communicative and rhetorical aspects of these maritime forms explaining why they are written in the way they are, especially in the light of their users who constitute a specific discourse community. The structure of a sample of representative lists is presented, as these check lists do not differ from the forms used by other European shipping companies. After interviews with the seafarers (deck and engine officers) to whom the check lists were administered, the conclusion was reached that they prefer short and unambiguous forms. In addition, a correlation about the language competence of the crew members on board ship was found: the simpler the discourse of the check list, the lower the responsibility of the crew member on board. Further, investigation into these complex language patterns focuses on the practical benefits.

Key words

Check Lists Language Structure Genre Analysis Practical Benefits 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Basturkmen, H. 2006.Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, G., and G. Yule. 1983.Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dulić, S. 2000.ISM Code-Medunarodni kodeks upravljanja sigurnoŝću, objaŝnjenja i primjena. Bijela: Azalea Maritime Training Centre.Google Scholar
  4. Fairclough, N. 1996. Globalisation of discursive practices.Globalization Research Network (April 2). (accessed January 2008).Google Scholar
  5. Hutchinson, T., and A. Waters. 1987.English for Specific Purposes: A Learner Centred Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. IMO Maritime English Model Course 3.17.2001. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
  7. Jurlina, T. 2005.Terminology and Discourse in the Maritime Written Communication. Master Thesis. Belgrade University.Google Scholar
  8. Klare, G.R. 2000. The Measurement of Readability: Useful Information for Communicators.ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, no. 2 (August 6). http:// portal. 665&CFTOKEN=354409 (accessed May 2008).Google Scholar
  9. Lakić, I.1999.Analiza žanra: Diskurs jezika struke. Podgorica: Univerzitet Crne Gore. Luzer, J., and S. Tominac. 2007. Service Letters, IMEC –19 Proceedings, (October 2007). (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
  10. Pritchard, B. 2004. A Survey of Maritime English Teaching Materials (A report on the current state of the art), no. 1(October 7). downloads/report 1.pdf (accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
  11. Quirk, R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., and J. Svartvik. 1989.A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  12. Redish, J. 2000. Readability Formulas Have Even More Limitations Than Klare Discusses.ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, no. 3 (August 2000). http://portal. 4665&CFTOKEN=35440950 (accessed January 2008).Google Scholar
  13. Savić, S. 1998.Diskurs analiza. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet.Google Scholar
  14. Spinčić, A., and J. Luzer. 1999.Engleski u brodostrojarskim komunikacijama (English in Marine Engineering Communications). Rijeka: Adamić i Visoka pomorska pomorska škola u Rijeci.Google Scholar
  15. Swales, J. 1990.Genre Analysis—English in Academic and Research Setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Van Dijk, T. 1976. Narrative Macrostructures: Logical and Cognitive Foundations. AJournal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature Vol. 1 (February 1976). http:// (accessed July 2008).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Maritime University 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Maritime StudiesUniversity of MontenegroKotor

Personalised recommendations