Abstract
Electronic charts have come more and more into use for marine navigation. If complying with the relevant international standards they are an accepted substitute to the mandatory carriage of paper nautical charts. However, the potential of such official, high-quality electronic chart data goes far beyond the use for navigation. In order to show its potential, the basic concepts and features of official electronic charts as a marine geographic information data base are explained and the relation of Hydrographic Offices responsible for their production, to Maritime Administrations is described. The data standard to be followed for electronic charts opens the use of the data for a wide range of possible applications. If efficiently organised, Maritime Administrations can be provided with a powerful, versatile database establishing a single geographic reference data base for e.g. Vessel Traffic Services, for Search and Rescue as well as for various applications in Coastal Zone Management including coastal protection and marine environmental protection. Ultimately, digital marine geographic information will become part of the evolving global spatial data infrastructure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ECDIS-PS: Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS). IMO, Res. A.817 (19), London, 1995
IHOS57: IHO Transfer Standard for Digital Hydrographic Data. IHO Special Publication S-57, edition 3.1, Monaco, 2001.
Hecht, H; Berking, B., Büttgenbach, G., Jonas, M., Alexander, L..: The Electronic Chart. Functions, Potential and Limitations of a new Marine navigation System. Book, to be published fall 2002. GITC bv, Lemmer (Netherlands).
Froese, J.: The Potential of Digital Charts in Maritime Navigation. Proceedings, The 1992 International Conference of the Royal Institute of Navigation and the German Institute of Navigation. 17–19 November 1992, London.
Andreasen, C.: The IHO, Electronic Charting and the Changing Relationships to Ports. Int. Hydrogr. Rev., Vol. LXXI(2), Monaco, September 1994
Pace, J.: Electronic Charts: the Course to Go. HYDROCOMM95. Ottawa, 1995
Helcom: The Copenhagen Declaration. Helsinki Commission (Helcom), 2001. See: www.helcom.fi/manandsea/shipping/navigation.html
Sudhendar, H.; Grabowski, M.: Evolution of Intelligent Shipboard Piloting Systems: A Distributed System for the st. Lawrence Seaway. J. of Navigation, Vol. 49 no. (1996), p. 362–376
Kamlade, W.:Maritime Pilots on Data Network. In: News from Member Countries, Germany. European Maritime Pilots Association (EMPA) Journal, no. 31, p. 27–28, 1995
Fiebelkom 1996
Hall, J.: Maritime Safety in the United States and the Role of Electronic Charting. Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Maritime Law and the Electronic Chart. New Orleans, 1995
COST326: Electronic chart display and information systems. COST326, Task4: The use of ECDIS on harbour approach systems, VTS and its interface with inland waterway transport. European Commission, Directorate-General for Transport VII/241/96. Brussels, 1996
Harre, I. Meine, J.: EDIC in VTS, Applicational Considerations and First Results. Paper presented at SASMEX 98, Brighton, UK, 21–23 April, 1998
Marsh, P., Richards, Th.: Martine Technology in the San Francisco Bay Region. Proceedings of the Maritime Safety Council, Vol. 53 No. 3 (1996). US Coast Guard, Arlington, VA.
Speidel, D.; Ahrendt, F.: Gefahrgutbegleitende Informationssysteme zur Unterstützung der Logistik von Gefahrguttransporten. (Information systems in support of transport logistics for hazardous goods). Paper presented at the 1994 session of the Maritime Commission of the German Institute of Navigation.
BSH: Continental Shelf Information System (CONTIS). Available on internet: www.bsh.de. (2002)
see e.g. www.gsdi.org
Hecht, H.: The Digital Hydrographic Office. Proceedings Hydro2001. US Hydrographic Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hecht, H. Potential and benefits of electronic charts to Maritime Administrations. WMU J Marit Affairs 1, 33–45 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195024
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195024