Acta Theriologica

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 259–262 | Cite as

Dispersal of common dormiceMuscardinus avellanarius in a habitat mosaic

  • Sven Büchner


In the eastern part of Saxony (Germany), common dormiceMuscardinus avellanarius (Linnaeus, 1758) were found in very small woods (average area of 10 woods was 2.9 ± 1.4 ha) isolated within agricultural fields for more than 100 years (average distance to the next, larger wood 268 ± 84 m). Dormice reproduced even in wood islands smaller than two hectares. Altogether 6 marked dormice were recorded migrating across the open landscape. Of these, 5 were juveniles. Minimum and maximum distances in treeless areas between points of capture and recapture were 250 and 500 m respectively. These migrations over open ground seem to be rare but normal events and explain the presence of common dormice in very small patches of woodland in habitat mosaics.

Key words

Muscardinus avellanarius fragmentation migration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bright P. W. 1998. Behaviour of specialist species in habitat corridors: arboreal dormice avoid corridor gaps. Animal Behaviour 56: 1485–1490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bright P. W. and Morris P. A. 1989. A practical guide to dormouse conservation. Occasional publication no. 11. The Mammal Society, London: 1–31.Google Scholar
  3. Bright P. W. and Morris P. A. 1990. Habitat requirements of dormiceMuscardinus avellanarius in relation to woodland management in south west England. Biological Conservation 54: 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bright P. W. and Morris P. A. 1991. Ranging and nesting behaviour of the dormouse,Muscardinus avellanarius, in diverse low-growing woodland. Journal of Zoology, London 224: 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bright P. W. and Morris P. A. 1992. Ranging and nesting behaviour of the dormouse,Muscardinus avellanarius, in coppice-with-standards woodland. Journal of Zoology, London 226: 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bright P. W. and Morris P. A. 1996. Why are dormice rare? A case study in conservation biology. Mammal Review 26: 157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bright P. W. and Morris P. A. 2005. The dormouse. 2nd edition. The Mammal Society, London: 1–27.Google Scholar
  8. Bright P. W., Mitchel P. and Morris P. A. 1994. Dormouse distribution: survey techniques, insular ecology and selection of sites for conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bright P. W., Morris P. A. and Mitchell-Jones T. 2006. The Dormouse Conservation Handbook. Second Edition. English Nature, Peterborourgh: 1–76.Google Scholar
  10. Büchner S. 1997. Common dormice in small isolated woods. Natura Croatica 6: 271–274.Google Scholar
  11. Capizzi D., Battistini M. and Amori G. 2002. Analysis of the hazel dormouse,Muscardinus avellanarius, distribution in a Mediterranean fragmented woodland. Italian Journal of Zoology 69: 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herr O. 1942. Aus Natur und Museum. Abhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Görlitz 33: 131–171.Google Scholar
  13. Juškaitis R. 1997. Ranging and movement of the common dormouseMuscardinus avellanarius in Lithuania. Acta Theriologica 42: 113–122.Google Scholar
  14. Juškaitis R. 2003. Abundance dynamics and reproduction success in the common dormouse,Muscardinus avellanarius, populations in Lithuania. Folia Zoologica 52: 239–248.Google Scholar
  15. Schulze W. 1987. Zur Mobilität der Haselmaus (Muscardinus avellanarius L.) im Südharz. Säugetierkundliche Informationen 11: 485–488.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Ecological StudiesMarkersdorfGermany

Personalised recommendations