Skip to main content
Log in

Nest mortality in a population of small mammals

  • Fragmenta Theriologica
  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Female white-footed micePeromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque, 1818) and their dependent offspring were monitored in nest boxes to determine the extent and causes of nest mortality. The mortality of dependent young was high (561 of 838; 66%) and variable among years. Most mortality involved the loss of entire litters (112 of 183 litters; 61%), with half of these losses attributed to the death of lactating females before the young were weaned (59 of 112 litters; 53%). Most mortality was from unknown causes, although infanticide, energetic constraints and predation were identified in a small number of cases. Predation is likely the major source of mortality in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyce C. C. K. and Boyce J. L. III. 1988. Population biology ofMicrotus arvalis. I. Lifetime reproductive success of solitary and grouped breeding females. Journal of Animal Ecology 57: 711–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty D. 1952. Mortality among voles (Microtus agrestis) at Lake Vyrnwy, Montgomeryshire in 1936-39. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B. 236: 505–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty D. and Phipps E. 1966. Seasonal changes in survival in mixed populations of two species of vole. Journal of Animal Ecology 35: 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole F. R. and Batzli G. O. 1978. Influence of supplemental feeding on a vole population. Journal of Mammalogy 59: 809–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaines M. S. and Rose R. K. 1976. Population dynamics ofMicrotus ochrogaster in eastern Kansas. Ecology 57: 1145–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz L. L. 1960. A poulation study of the vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. American Midland Naturalist 64: 392–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz L. L., Sims L. E. and McGuire B. 2000. Nestling survival and population cycles in the prairie vole,Microtus ochrogaster. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 1723–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey G. K. 1955. Observations on the nature of the decline in numbers of twoMicrotus populations. Journal of Mammalogy 36: 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golley F. B. 1961. Interaction of natality, mortality and movement during one annual cycle in aMicrotus population. American Midland Naturalist 66: 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham I. M. and Lambin X. 2002. The impact of weasel predation on cyclic field-vole survival: the specialist predator hypothesis contradicted. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 946–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goundie T. R. and Vessey S. H. 1986. Survival and dispersal of young white-footed mice born in nest boxes. Journal of Mammalogy 67: 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havelka M. A. and Millar J. S. 2000. Use of artificial nest sites as a function of age of litter inPeromyscus leucopus. American Midland Naturalist 144: 152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havelka M. A. and Millar J. S. (in press). Maternal age drives seasonal variation in litter size ofPeromyscus leucopus. Journal of Mammalogy.

  • Hoffmann R. S. 1958. The role of reproduction and mortality in population fluctuations of voles (Microtus). Ecological Monographs 28: 79–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes D. G. L. and Millar J. S. 1990. Number of litters, litter size and survival in two species of microtines at two elevations. Holarctic Ecology 13: 207- 216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivula M., Koskela E., Mappes T. and Oksanen T. A. 2003. Cost of reproduction in the wild: Manipulation of reproductive effort in the bank vole. Ecology 84: 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C. J. 1964. The lemming cycle at Baker Lake, Northwest Territories, during 1959-62. Arctic Institute of North America Technical Paper Number 15: 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C. J. and DeLong K. T. 1965. AMicrotus population with supplemental food. Journal of Mammalogy 46: 566–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C. J. and Myers J. H. 1974. Population cycles in small mammals. Advances in Ecological Research 8: 267–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar J. S., Burkholder D. and Lang T. 1986. Estimating age at independence inPeromyscus populations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64: 910–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar J. S. and McAdam A. G. 2001. Life on the edge: the demography of short-season populations of deer mice. Oikos 93: 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau J. H. 1985. Ontogeny. [In: Biology of New WorldMicrotus. R. H. Tamarin, ed]. Special Publication Number 8, The American Society of Mammalogists: 254-285.

  • Reid D. G., Krebs C. J. and Kenney A. 1995. Limitation of collared lemming population growth at low densities by predation mortality. Oikos 73: 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff J. O. and Cicirello D. M. 1989. Field evidence for sexual selection and resource competition infanticide in white-footed mice. Animal Behavior 38: 637–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen H., Koskela E. and Mappes T. 1997. Infanticide in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus): occurrence and the effect of familiarity on female infanticide. Annales Zoologici Fennici 34: 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Associate Editor was Joseph F. Merritt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miliar, J.S., Havelka, M.A. & Sharma, S. Nest mortality in a population of small mammals. Acta Theriol 49, 269–273 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192526

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192526

Key words

Navigation