Acta Theriologica

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 43–51 | Cite as

The impact of plateau zokorMyospalax fontanierii burrows on alpine meadow vegetation on the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) plateau



The impact of burrows constructed by plateau zokorsMyospalax fontanierii (Milne-Edwards, 1867) on alpine meadow vegetation on the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) plateau was investigated. Plant samples taken from quadrats directly over active zokor burrows, back-filled burrows, adjacent burrow controls, and random sites from a field, in which no burrows or mounds occurred were compared. The biomass of plants (below- and above-ground) directly over shallow active burrows was significantly lower than on control plots. This reduction in biomass was not significantly different than that between deep active burrows and control plots. There were no significant differences between above- and below-ground plant biomass on areas perpendicular to active burrows when compared to random sites. Back-filling soil in burrows could promote the growth of above-ground monocotyledonous plants. However, the burrowing activities of zokors had a negative effect on biomass of dicotyledonous plants.

Key words

Myospalax fontanierii burrow alpine meadow vegetation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Begall S. and Gallardo M. H. 2000.Spalacopus cyanus (Octodontidae, Rodentia): an extremist in tunnel constructing and food storing among subterranean mammals. Journal of Zoology, London 251: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buffenstein R., Woodley R., Thomadakis C. and Daly T. J. M. 2001. Cold induced changes in thyroid function in a poikilothermic mammal, the naked mole rat. American Journal of Physiology 280: 149–155.Google Scholar
  3. Cincotta R. P., Zhang Y. and Zhou X. 1992. Transhumant alpine pastoralism in northwestern Qinghai province: An evaluation of livestock population response during China’s agrarian economic reform. Nomadic People 30: 3–25.Google Scholar
  4. Ebensperger L. A. and Bozinovic F. 2000. Energetics and burrowing behaviour in the semifossorial deguOctodon degus (Rodentia: Octodontidae). Journal of Zoology, London 252: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fan N. and Shi Y. 1982. A revision of the zokors of subgenusEospalax. Acta Theriologica Sinica 2: 183–200. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
  6. Goldman B. D., Goldman S. L., Lanz T. and Magaurin A. 1999. Factors influencing metabolic rate in naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber). Physiology and Behavior 66: 447–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Grant W. E. and McBrayer J. F. 1981. Effects of mound formation by pocket gophers (Geomys bursarius) on old-field ecosystems. Pedobiologia 22: 21–28.Google Scholar
  8. Grant W. E., French N. R. and Folse L. J. 1980. Effects of pocket gopher mounds on plant production in a shortgrass prairie ecosystem. Southwest Naturalist 2: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobbs R. J. and Mooney H. A. 1985. Community and population dynamics of serpentine grassland annuals in relation to gopher disturbance. Oecologia 67: 342–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huntly N. and Reichman O. J. 1994. Effects of subterranean mammalian on vegetation. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 852–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huntly N. J. and Inouye R. S. 1988. Pocket gophers in ecosystems: Patterns and mechanisms. Bioscience 38: 786–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klaas B. A., Danielson B. J. and Moloney K. A. 1998. Influence of pocket gophers on meadow voles in a tallgrass prairie. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 942–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lovegrove B. G. 1989. The cost of burrowing by the social mole rats (Bathyergidae)Cryptomys damarensis andHetercephalus glaber: the role of soil moisture. Physiological Zoology 62: 449–469.Google Scholar
  14. Martinsen G. D., Cushman J. H. and Whitham T. G. 1990. Impact of pocket gopher disturbance on plant species diversity in a shortgrass prairie community. Oecologia 83: 132–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mielke H. W. 1977. Mound building by pocket gophers (Geomyidae): their impact on soils and vegetation on North America. Journal of Biogeography 4: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moloney K. A. and Levin S. A. 1996. The effects of disturbance architecure on landscape-level population dynamics. Ecology 77: 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moshkin M. P., Novikov E. A. and Petrovski D. V. 2001. Seasonal changes of thermoregulation in the mole voleEllobius talpinus. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 74: 869–875.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nespolo R. F., Bacigalupe L. D., Rezende E. L. and Bozinovic F. 2001. When nonshivering thermogenesis equals maximum metabolic rate: thermal acclimation and phenotypic plasticity of fossorialSpalacopus cyanus (Rodentia). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 74: 325–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Reichman O. J. and Jarvis J. U. M. 1989. The influence of three sympatric species of fossorial molerats (Batheryergidae) on vegetation. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reichman O. J. and Seabloom E. W. 2002. The role of pocket gophers as subterranean ecosystem engineers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reichman O. J. and Smith S. C. 1985. Impact of pocket gopher burrows on overlying vegetation. Journal of Mammalogy 66: 720–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reichman O. J., Benedix J. H. and Seastedt T. R. 1993. Distinct animal generated edge effects in tallgrass prairie community. Ecology 74: 1281–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. F. 1981. Biometry. WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco: 1–350.Google Scholar
  24. Spencer S. R., Cameron G. N., Eshelman B. D., Cooper L. C. and Williams L. R. 1985. Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie. Oecologia 66: 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tilman D. 1983. Plant succession and gopher disturbance along an experimental gradient. Oecologia 60: 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tilman D. 1987. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nutrient gradients. Ecological Monographs 57: 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vleck D. 1979. The energy cost of burrowing by the pocker gopherThomomys bottae. Physiological Zoology 52: 122–136.Google Scholar
  28. Wang Q., Bian J. and Shi Y. 1993. Influence of Plateau zokor mounds on the vegetation and soil nutrients in an alpine meadow. Acta Theriologica Sinica 13: 31–37. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
  29. Williams L. R. and Cameron G. N. 1986. Food habits dietary preferences of Attwater’s pocket gopher,Geomys attwateri. Journal of Mammalogy 67: 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams L. R., Cameron G. N., Spencer S. R., Eshelman B. D. and Gregory M. J. 1986. Experimental analysis of the effects of pocket gopher mounds on Texas coastal prairie. Journal of Mammalogy 67: 672–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xia W. 1988. A brief introduction to the fundamental characteristics and the work in Haibei Research Station of Alpine Meadow Ecosystem. [In: The Proceedings of the International Symposium of Alpine Meadow Ecosystem. Xining, 1986. W. Xia, ed]. Science Press, Beijing: 1–10. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
  32. Yang F. 1982. A general view of the natural geography in the region of the research station of alpine meadow ecosystem. [In: Alpine Meadow Ecosystem, fascicle 1. W. Xia, ed]. Science Press, Beijing: 1–8. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
  33. Zhang Y. 2000. Studies on the pattern of animal-plant interaction: The effects of Plateau zokor on the biogeochemical cycling of alpine meadow ecosystem and it’s response to the chemical defense of plant. PhD thesis, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing: 1–130. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
  34. Zhang Y., Fan N. and Wang Q. 1999. Effects of environmental factors on population abundance of Plateau zokors. Acta Biologica Plateau Sinica 14: 101–109. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
  35. Zhang Y., Fan N., Wang Q. and Jing Z. 1998. The change of ecological process of rodent communities during rodent pest management in alpine meadow. Acta Theriologica Sinica 18: 137–143. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
  36. Zhang Y. and Jeffrey M. W. 1996. Tibetan alpine tundra responses to simulated changes in climate: Above-ground biomass and community responses. Arctic and Alpine Research 28: 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang Y. and Liu J. 2003. Effects of plateau zokors (Myospalax fontanierii) on plant community and soil in an alpine meadow. Journal of Mammalogy 84: 644–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Y., Zhang Z. and Liu J. 2003. Burrowing rodents as ecosystem engineers: the ecology and mamagement of plateau zokorsMyospalax fontanierii in alpine meadow ecosystems on the Tibetan plateau. Mammal Review: 284–294.Google Scholar
  39. Zhang Y. and Zhou X. 1992. The quantitative classification and ordernation of Haibei Alpine Meadow. Acta Phytooecological and Geobotanica Sinica 1: 36–42. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar
  40. Zhang Y., Zhou X. and Richard P. C. 1994. Study of diversity and succession pattern of plant communities on zokor mounds. Acta Ecologica Sinica 14: 42–49. [In Chinese with English summary]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwest Plateau Institute of Biologythe Chinese Academy of SciencesXining, Qinghai ProvincePeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Life ScienceZhejiang UniversityHangzhou, Zhejiang ProvincePeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations