Acta Theriologica

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 185–192 | Cite as

Identification of vertebrate scavengers of small mammal carcasses in a forested landscape

  • Travis L. DeVault
  • Olin E. Rhodes


We identified vertebrate scavengers of small mammal carcasses at the 780-km2 Savannah River Site during the winter of 2000–2001. Rodent carcasses, differing in size and visual conspicuousness, were placed in upland pine forests and bottomland hardwood forests during six 2-week periods. Sixty-two of the 96 carcasses (65%) were removed by vertebrates. With the aid of remote photography, we identified 11 species of scavengers removing carcasses. RaccoonsProcyon lotor, gray foxesUrocyon cinereoargenteus, and feral pigsSus scrofa scavenged most frequently. The mean elapsed time for carcass removal was 5.6 days. The number of carcasses removed by vertebrates did not differ significantly with respect to carcass size, visual conspicuousness, or habitat type; however, air temperature was strongly correlated (positively) with carcass removal. Our study demonstrates that many mammal species are capable of utilizing small carrion items as a food resource, and suggests that scavenging may account for a higher proportion of the diet of some facultative scavengers than is now widely assumed.

Key words

carrion diet food habits remote photography scavenging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balcomb R. 1986. Songbird carcasses disappear rapidly from agricultural fields. Auk 103: 817–820.Google Scholar
  2. Bobek B. 1969. Survival, turnover and production of small rodents in a beech forest. Acta Theriologica 14: 191–210.Google Scholar
  3. Bobek B. 1973. Net production of small rodents in a deciduous forest. Acta Theriologica 18: 403–434.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper S. M., Holekamp K. E. and Smale L. 1999. A seasonal feast: long-term analysis of feeding behaviour in the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta). African Journal of Ecology 37: 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowles R. B. and Phelan R. L. 1958. Olfaction in rattlesnakes. Copeia 1958: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halley D. J. and Gjershaug J. O. 1998. Inter- and intra-specific dominance relationships and feeding behaviour of Golden EaglesAquila chrysaetos and Sea EaglesHaliaeetus albicilla at carcasses. Ibis 140: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henry J. D. 1977. The use of urine marking in the scavenging behavior of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Behaviour 61: 82–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hooge P. N. and Eichenlaub B. 1997. Animal movement extension to ArcView. Ver. 1.1. Alaska Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska.Google Scholar
  9. Hosmer D. W. and Lemeshow S. 1989. Applied logistic regression. Wiley and Sons, New York: 1–307.Google Scholar
  10. Houston D. C. 1979. The adaptations of scavengers. [In: Serengeti, dynamics of an ecosystem. A. R. E. Sinclair and M. N. Griffiths, eds]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 263–286.Google Scholar
  11. Janzen D. H. 1977. Why fruits rot, seeds mold, and meat spoils. The American Naturalist 111: 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones M. E. 1998. The function of vigilance in sympatric marsupial carnivores: the eastern quoll and the Tasmanian devil. Animal Behaviour 56: 1279–1284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McKillup S. C. and McKillup R. V. 1994. The decision to feed by a scavenger in relation to the risks of predation and starvation. Oecologia 97: 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mullen D. A. and Pitelka F. A. 1972. Efficiency of winter scavengers in the Arctic. Arctic 25: 225–231.Google Scholar
  15. Norusis M. J. 1999. SPSS regression models 10.0. SPSS, Inc., Chicago: 1–82.Google Scholar
  16. Pain D. J. 1991. Why are lead-poisoned waterfowl rarely seen?: the disappearance of waterfowl carcasses in the Camargue, France. Wildfowl 42: 118–122.Google Scholar
  17. Payne J. A. 1965. A summer carrion study of the baby pigSus scrofa Linnaeus. Ecology 46: 592–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Putman R. J. 1976. Energetics of the decomposition of animal carrion. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford: 1–131.Google Scholar
  19. Putman R. J. 1978. Patterns of carbon dioxide evolution from decaying carrion. Decomposition of small mammal carrion in temperate systems 1. Oikos 31: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Putman R. J. 1983. Carrion and dung: the decomposition of animal wastes. Edward Arnold, London: 1–62.Google Scholar
  21. Rosene W. and Lay D. W. 1963. Disappearance and visibility of quail remains. The Journal of Wildlife Management 27: 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shean B. S., Messinger L. and Papworth M. 1993. Observations of differential decomposition on sun exposed v. shaded pig carrion in coastal Washington State. Journal of Forensic Sciences 38: 938–949.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shivik J. A. 1999. Carrion, context, and lure development: the relative importance of sensory modalities to foraging brown treesnakes (Bioga irregularis). PhD thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins: 1–121.Google Scholar
  24. Shivik J. A. and Clark L. 1997. Carrion seeking in brown tree snakes: importance of olfactory and visual cues. Journal of Experimental Zoology 279: 549–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simonetti J. A., Yanez J. L. and Fuentes E. R. 1984. Efficiency of rodent scavengers in central Chile. Mammalia 48: 608–609.Google Scholar
  26. SPSS. 1999. SPSS base 10.0 applications guide. SPSS, Inc., Chicago: 1–426.Google Scholar
  27. Tobin M. E. and Dolbeer R. A. 1990. Disappearance and recoverability of songbird carcasses in fruit orchards. Journal of Field Ornithology 61: 237–242.Google Scholar
  28. Wallace M. P. and Temple S. A. 1987. Competitive interactions within and between species in a guild of avian scavengers. Auk 104: 290–295.Google Scholar
  29. White D. L. and Gaines K. F. 2000. The Savannah River Site: site description, land use, and management history. Studies in Avian Biology 21: 8–17.Google Scholar
  30. Wiggins-Brown H., Pinder J. E. III, Guy K. K. and Rea T. E. 2000. 1999 Habitat map of the Savannah River Site. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina.Google Scholar
  31. Wilton M. L. 1986. Scavenging and its possible effects upon predation — a selective review of literature. Alces 22: 155–180.Google Scholar
  32. Workman S. K. and McLeod K. W. 1990. Vegetation of the Savannah River Site: major community types. SRO-NERP-19. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, South Carolina: 1–137.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Travis L. DeVault
    • 1
  • Olin E. Rhodes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations