Advertisement

Mycotoxin Research

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 47–52 | Cite as

Detection and estimation of aflatoxins using both chemical and biological techniques

  • Refai M K 
  • Hatem M E 
  • Sharaby E 
  • Saad MM 
Article

Abstract

Production of aflatoxins on both natural (rice and corn) and semisynthetic (YES) media was conducted using an identified toxin-producing strain ofAspergillus flavus. TheA flavus strain was able to produce 4 types of aflatoxins, namely B1, B2, G1, and G2 on rice, corn, and YES media. Quantitative data showed that the concentrations of aflatoxins B1 and G1 produced were 52, 40.3, and 39.6; and 64.7, 45.0, and 58.0jug for 50g of rice, corn, and YES media, respectively. In comparison, the yielded amounts of aflatoxins B2 and G2 were much lower: 11.5, 17.9, and 17.5; and 28.S, 40.3, and 39.5 μg for 50 g of rice, corn, and YES media, respectively.

A bioassay was conducted using the following 5 standard bacterial strains:Bacillus megaterium. Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus faecal is, Staphylococcus epidermidis, andParacoccus denitrificans as well as a field strain of Candida albicans. All strains exceptP denitrificans showed varied degrees of inhibition when applied with crude aflatoxins at 5 to 40μg/mL. The minimum concentration of crude aflatoxins needed to inhibitP denitrificans was 10μg/mL. Moreover,Candida albicans was not inhibited at any concentration of aflatoxins applied in this work.

Both undiluted and diluted (1/10, 1/100, and 1/1000) bacterial broth cultures showed a direct relationship between the diameter of inhibition zones and the concentrations of crude aflatoxins. Mean diameters of (7.0–20.5), (5–14), (4.5–13.0), (3.0–12.0), and (1.5–11.0) mm were observed when various concentrations of aflatoxins were applied usingB megaterium, S epidermidis, S faecal is, B subtilis, andP denitrificans, respectively.

Field trials were applied to testify the validity of our data. A 1/100 dilution was prepared from each strain of 4 different species to estimate aflatoxins in samples of contaminated corn. Both chemical and biological assays were carried out at the same time. Data revealed that the most sensitive organism inhibited by as low as 7.5μg aflatoxins/mL wasB megaterium giving an inhibition zone of 10.5 mm, followed byS epidermidis with an inhibition zone of 7.5mm. In relation, the other 2 organisms were less sensitive to crude aflatoxins. Similarly, the biological assay was applied to detect aflatoxins in some samples of wheat, corn, peanut, rice, and poultry rations. Of the 14 wheat and 10 corn samples, only 4 wheat and 2 corn samples were found to be positive. The same results were obtained using TLC analysis.

Keywords

Aflatoxin Candida Albicans Rabie Inhibition Zone Bacillus Megaterium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ajello L, George LM, Kaplan W, and Kaufman L (1963) Laboratory manual for medical mycology public health service. Publ No 994, US Government Print Office, Washington, pp A16, pp D11 and 39Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shotwell OL, Hesseltine CW, Stubblefield RD, and Sorenson WG (1966) Production of aflatoxin on rice. Appl Microbiol 14 (3): 425–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis ND, Diener UL, and Eldrigde DW (1967) Production of aflatoxin B, and G1 byAspergillus flavus in a semi-synthetic medium. J Appl Microbiol 14 (3): 378–380Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Association of Official Analytical Chemists “AOAC” (1980) Official methods of analysis of the Association of the Official Analytical Chemists. 11th Ed, Benjamin Franklin Stat, Washington, DC 2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hatem ME, Tokarshy DL, Sims WS, and Corner TR (1982) Toxic interactions in growth inhibition of mitochondrial analogParacoccus denitrificans toxicology in Michigan today, 2nd Ann Michigan Stat Univ, MI 48824, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Bazza ZE, Zedan HH, Toama MA, and El-Tayeb OM (1981) Factors affecting aflatoxin production by a local strain ofAspergillus flams (isolate No 14), Symp of Mycotox, Cairo, Egypt, 1981Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin YC, Ayres JC, and Koehler PE (1980) Influencing of cyclic temperature on the production of aflatoxin B1 and G1 byA parasiticus. Appl Environ Microbiol 40:333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rabie CJ and Smalley CB (1965) Influence of temperature on the production of aflatoxins byAspergillus flavus. Symp Mycotoxins in foodstuffs. Agric Asp Pretoria, South Africa, pp 18–29Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burmeister HR and Hesseltine CW (1966) Survey of the sensitivity of micro-organisms to aflatoxins. J Appl Microbiol 14: 403–404Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lülehø EB and Ciegler A (1968) Aflatoxin B1 binding and toxic effects onBacillus megaterium. Gen Microbiol 45:185–194Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buckelew RA, Jr; Chakravorti A, Burg RW, Thomas MV, and Miyoshi I (1972) Effect of mycotoxins and Cumarins on the growth ofBacillus megaterium from spores. J Agric Food Chem 20 (2):431–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tiwari RP, Phan CK, Bhalla TC, Saini SS, and Vadehra DV (1985) Mechanism of action of aflatoxin B1 inBacillus megaterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 49 (3): 903–907Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wogan CN (1977) Mode of action of aflatoxins (CF Mycotoxins in human and animal health). Copyright, 1977 Pathotox Publ IncGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Mycotoxin Research and Springer 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Refai M K 
    • 1
  • Hatem M E 
    • 1
  • Sharaby E 
    • 1
  • Saad MM 
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Veterinary MedicineCairo UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Mycotoxins Lab National Research CentreCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations