Skip to main content
Log in

Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process

  • Published:
RACSAM - Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the great mathematician Henri Lebesgue, making direct comparisons of objects with regard to a property is a fundamental mathematical process for deriving measurements. Measuring objects by using a known scale first then comparing the measurements works well for properties for which scales of measurement exist. The theme of this paper is that direct comparisons are necessary to establish measurements for intangible properties that have no scales of measurement. In that case the value derived for each element depends on what other elements it is compared with. We show how relative scales can be derived by making pairwise comparisons using numerical judgments from an absolute scale of numbers. Such measurements, when used to represent comparisons can be related and combined to define a cardinal scale of absolute numbers that is stronger than a ratio scale. They are necessary to use when intangible factors need to be added and multiplied among themselves and with tangible factors. To derive and synthesize relative scales systematically, the factors are arranged in a hierarchic or a network structure and measured according to the criteria represented within these structures. The process of making comparisons to derive scales of measurement is illustrated in two types of practical real life decisions, the Iran nuclear show-down with the West in this decade and building a Disney park in Hong Kong in 2005. It is then generalized to the case of making a continuum of comparisons by using Fredholm’s equation of the second kind whose solution gives rise to a functional equation. The Fourier transform of the solution of this equation in the complex domain is a sum of Dirac distributions demonstrating that proportionate response to stimuli is a process of firing and synthesis of firings as neurons in the brain do. The Fourier transform of the solution of the equation in the real domain leads to nearly inverse square responses to natural influences. Various generalizations and critiques of the approach are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aczel, J. andAlsina, C., (1986). On synthesis of judgments,Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,20, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aczel, J. andSaaty, T. L., (1983). Procedures for synthesising ratio judgments,Journal of Mathematical Psychology,27, 93–102.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Arrow, K. J., (1963).Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer, R. A., Collar, E. andTang, V., (1992).The Silverlake Project, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brillouet-Belluot, N., (1999). On a Simple Linear Functional Equation on Normed Linear Spaces, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, F-44 072 Nantes-cedex 03, France, October 1999.

  6. Davis, P. J. andHersh, R., (1986).Descartes Dream, Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fechner, G., (1966).Elements of Psychophysics, Adler, H. E. (Trans.), Vol.2, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. See also Batschelet, S.,Introduction to Mathematics for Life Scientists, Springer, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lebesgue, H., (1928).Leçons sur l’integration, 2nd ed., Gauthier-Villars, Paris.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mackay, A. F., (1980).Arrow’s Theorem: The Paradox of Social Choice — A Case Study in the Philosophy of Economics, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Saaty, T. L., (2000).The Brain, Unraveling the Mystery of How it Works: The Neural Network Process, RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saaty, T. L., (2005).Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saaty, T. L., (2006).Fundamentals of Decision Making ; the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS 3. Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saaty, T. L., andOzdemir, M., (2005).The Encyclicon, RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saaty, T. L. andPeniwati, K., (2008).Group Decision Making, RWS Publications, 4922, Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saaty, T. L. andTran, L. T., (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process,Mathematical and Computer Modelling,46, 7-8, 962–975.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Saaty, T. L. andVargas, L. G., (1993). Experiments on Rank Preservation and Reversal in Relative Measurement,Math. Comput. Modelling,17, 4/5, 13–18.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty, T. L. andVargas, L. G., (1997). Implementing Neural Firing: Towards a New Technology,Mathl. Comput. Modelling,26, 4, 113–124.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G., (2008). The Possibility of Group Choice : Pairwise Comparisons and Merging Functions, (in publication).

  19. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G. and Whitaker, R., (2008). Addressing Criticisms of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, (in publication).

  20. Wilkinson, J. H., (1965).The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

(To the Memory of my Beloved Friend Professor Sixto Rios Garcia)

The author has been awarded with the 2008 Informs Impact Prize by the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences for his seminal work on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and for its deployment and extraordinary impact.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saaty, T.L. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. Rev. R. Acad. Cien. Serie A. Mat. 102, 251–318 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191825

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191825

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classifications

Navigation