Revue de synthèse

, Volume 107, Issue 1–2, pp 107–120 | Cite as

Hermeneutics and cross-cultural communication in Science : The reception of Western Scientific Ideas in 19th-Century India

  • Kapil Raj
Chronique De La Recherche


Western Science Caste Group Permanent Settlement Dutch East India Company Sanskrit College 


  1. 1.
    Among the more recent writings on the subject, see especially, Hans GeorgGadamer,Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr, 1975Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    ImreLakatos, » The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes «, inI. Lakatos,Philosophical Papers, ed. John Worall & Gregory Currie, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980, vol. 1, p. 102.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    For instance, between 1876–1877 and 1885–1886, 51 Muslims and 1,338 Hindus took the B.A. degree at Calcutta. In 1870 only 2 Muslims sat the B.A., while in the same year, 151 Hindus took the examination [Calculated from the Report of the Public Service Commission, 1886–1887, appendix M, p. 78–79, quoted in AnilSeal,The Emergence of Indian Nationalism. Competition and Collaboration in the Later Nineteenth Century, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1968, p. 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    For an expression of such arguments, see PradipSinha,Nineteenth Century Bengal. Aspects of Social History, Calcutta, Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay, 1965, p. 50ffGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    In the North-Western Provinces, Bihar, Orissa and Oudh, although the Muslims were in a minority, the community-wise education pattern was quite the opposite of that in Bengal. Cf.A. Seal,op. cit. supra Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    See Ahsan JanQaisar,The Indian Response to European Technology and Culture (A. D. 1498–1707), Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1982, p. 9ff.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    See YehudaElkana, « The Distinctiveness and Universality of Science: Reflections on the Work of Professor Robin Horton »,Minerva, XV,2, 1977, p. 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 9.
    Cf. John TheodoreMerz,A History of European Thought in the Nineteenth Century, 4 vols, London, W. Blackwood, 1904–1912, especially vols 1 and 2Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    For an insightful analysis of some of the problematic characteristics of this scientific community, see in particular, VandanaShiva, JayantaBandhopadhyay, « The Large and Fragile Community of Scientists in India »,Minerva, XVIII,4, 1980, p. 575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 11.
    See Amulya KumarBag, « Binomial Theorem in Ancient India »,Indian Journal of History of Science. I,1, 1966, p. 68–74.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    DebiprasadChattopadhyaya, ed.,Studies in the History of Science in India, 2 vols, New Delhi, Editorial Enterprises, 1982, vol. 11, p. 415–478.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Cf. Damodar DharmanandKosambi,An Introduction to the Study of Indian History, Bombay, Popular Book Depot, 1956, p. 260ff.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Cf.B. L. Van der Waerden, « Two Treatises on Indian Astronomy »,Journal for the History of Astronomy, XI, 1980, p. 50–58.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    TapanRaychaudhuri, »Non-Agricultural Production », inT. Ray-chaudhuri, IrfanHabib, eds,The Cambridge Economic History of India, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982, vol. I, p. 285.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Cf.D. D. Kosambi,Myth and Reality: Studies in the Formation of Indian Culture, Bombay, Popular Prakashan, 1962.Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    M. Habib, Khaliq AhmadNizami,Delhi Sultanat, Delhi, People’s Publishing House, 1970Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Kunwar MuhammedAshraf,Life and Conditions of the People of Hindustan, New Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal, 1970, p. 108ff, especially p. 111.Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    D. M. Bose et al., eds,A Concise History of Science in India, New Delhi, Indian National Science Academy, 1971, p. 45ff, 133–135, 209ff.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    Cf. Seyyed HosseinNasr,Science and Civilisation in Islam, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1968Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    DharmaKumar, ed.,The Cambridge Economic History of India, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982, vol. II, p. 299.Google Scholar
  21. 27.
    I have borrowed this term from NarahariKaviraj,Wahabi and Farazi Rebels of Bengal, New Delhi, People’s Publishing House, 1982, p. 4.Google Scholar
  22. 28.
    Sushil KumarDe,History of Bengali Literature in the Nineteenth Century, Calcutta, Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay, 19612, p. 42.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    Narendra KrishnaSinha,The Economic History of Bengal, 3 vols, Calcutta, Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay, 19653, vol. I, p. 101.Google Scholar
  24. 30.
    Ibid., vol. I, p. 4–5.Google Scholar
  25. 31.
    op. cit. supra n. 5, p. 44.Google Scholar
  26. 33.
    See RaymondSchwab,La Renaissance orientale, Paris, Payot, 1950Google Scholar
  27. 34.
    Minute by Warren Hastings, dated the 17th April, 1781, in HenrySharp, ed.,Selections from Educational Records, Part I, 1781–1839, Calcutta, Superintendent Government Printing, 1920, p. 7–9.Google Scholar
  28. 35.
    Ibid., p. 30.Google Scholar
  29. 36.
  30. 37.
    Ibid. p. 186–187Google Scholar
  31. 38.
    Reprinted inibid, p. 83.Google Scholar
  32. 40.
    B. T. McCully,op. cit. supra n. 5, p. 21.Google Scholar
  33. 41.
  34. 42.
    Thomas Fisher’s Memoir, inH. Sharp, ed.,op. cit. supra n. 34, p. 183.Google Scholar
  35. 43.
    WilliamAdam, First report on the state of education in Bengal, Calcutta, 1835, inW. Adam,Reports on the State of Education in Bengal (1835 & 1838), ed. AnathnathBasu, Calcutta, University of Calcutta, 1941, p. 35.Google Scholar
  36. 44.
    Quoted inB. T. McCully,op. cit. supra n. 5.Google Scholar
  37. 45.
    Address, dated Uth December 1823, from Raja Rammohan Roy, inH. Sharp, ed.,op. cit. supra n. 34, p. 98–101.Google Scholar
  38. 46.
    N. K. Sinha, ed.,Days of John Company. Selections from Calcutta Gazette, 1824–1832, Calcutta, West Bengal Government Press, 1959, p. 227.Google Scholar
  39. 47.
    DavidKopf,British Orientalism and the Bengal Renaissance, Calcutta, Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay, 1969, p. 184.Google Scholar
  40. 48.
    Cf. Géraldine HancockForbes,Positivism in Bengal, Calcutta, Minerva Associates, 1975.Google Scholar
  41. 49.
    SeeL. Kolakowsky,op. cit. supra n. 9.Google Scholar
  42. 50.
    SeeJ. T. Merz,op. cit. supra n. 9 ; cf. also Paulo Cesar Coelho Abrantes,La Réception en France des théories de Maxwell en électricité et en magnétisme, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Paris 1, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondation « Pour la Science » / Springer-Verlag France 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kapil Raj

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations