Osteoporosis International

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 215–217 | Cite as

How can we tell if a treatment works? Further thoughts on the randomized controlled trial

  • R. P. Heaney
Guest Editorial


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Rose GA. The study of osteoporosis and osteomalacia. Postgrad Med J 1964; 40:158–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mosekilde L. Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture-assessed by a new method. Bone 1988; 9:247–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rich C, Bernstein DS, Gates S et al. Factors involved in an objective study of the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. Clin Orthop 1966; 45:63–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riggs BL, Hodgson SF, O’Fallon WM, et al. Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:802–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Storm T, Thamsborg G, Steiniche T, Genant HK, Sorensen OH. Effect of intermittent, cycLJcal etidronate therapy on bone mass and fracture rate in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1265–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK et al. Intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:73–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wolf S. The pharmacology of placebos. Pharmacol Rev 1959; 11:689–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beecher HK. The powerful placebo. JAMA 1955; 159:1602–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodwin JS, Goodwin JM, Vogel AV. Knowledge and use o placebos by house officers and nurses. Ann Intern Med 1979; 91:106–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heaney RP. How do we know what we know? The randomized controlled trial revisited. J Bone Miner Res 1991; 6:103–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feinstein AR. Epidemiologic analyses of causation: the unlearned scientific lessons of randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42:481–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korn EL, Baumrind S. Randomized cLJnical trials with clinician-preferred treatment. Lancet 1991; 337:149–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Veatch RM. Justice and research design: the case for a semirandomization clinical trial. Clin Res 1983; 31:12–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Foundation for Osteoporosis 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. P. Heaney
    • 1
  1. 1.Creighton UniversityOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations