Advertisement

Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 46, Supplement 1, pp 33–38 | Cite as

Development features and original altitude of a karst planation surface: Preliminary review

  • Dewen Li
  • Zhijiu Cui
  • Qiang Zhang
  • Baoqi Ma
Article

Abstract

Traditional theories of geographical cycle and pediplain cannot describe correctly the development of planation surfaces in karst regions. Authors, therefore, put forward conception of karst planation and karst planation surface, suggesting that karst planation is another type of planation process characterized by chemical erosion and transformation. To identify the distinction between evolution features of normal landforms and those of karst landforms developed in the South China, authors suggest karst planation surfaces under similar environmental conditions may reach a lower altitude and gradient ratio, in contrast with normal landform areas. This may be applied to researching on Tibetan Plateau uplift.

Keywords

karst planation surface peneplain pediplain Tibet Plateau 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cui, Z. J., Li, D. W., Wu, Y. Q. et al., Comment on planation surface, Chinese Science bulletin, 1999, 44 (22): 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li, J. J., Tree stages of uplift and planation surfaces of Tibetan Plateau, in Environment · Landform · Development, Beijing: Chinese Environmental Science Press, 1995, 1–5.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, J. J., Fang, X. M., Ma H. Z. et al., Geomorphological and environmental evolution in the upper reaches of the Yellow River during the late Cenozoic, Science in China, Ser. D, 1996, 39 (4): 380.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, J. J., Geomorphologic evolution of Tibetan Plateau and Asian monsoon, Marine Geoloby and Quaternary Geology, 1999, 19 (1): 1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cui, Z. J., Gao, Q. Z., Liu, G. N. et al., Planation surfaces, palaeo-karst and uplift of Xizang (Tibet) Plateau, Science in China, Ser. D, 1996, 39 (4): 391.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cui, Z. J., Gao, Q. Z., Liu, G. N. et al., The initial elevation of palaeokarst and planation surfaces on Tibet Plateau, Chinese Science Bulletin, 1997, 42 (11): 934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, D. W., Cui, Z. J., Liu, G. N., Existence of paleao-karst on Tibetan Plateau and its comparison with East adjustment district, Corsologica sinica, 1999, 18 (4): 309.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, D. W., Cui, Z. J., Liu, G. N., Feature and origin of covered karst on Hunan, Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan and Tibet, Journal of Mountain Science, 2000, 18 (4): 289.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ТИмоϕеев д. А., ПоепхностИ вьиравНИваНИЯ сущИ, МосКва: НауКа, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis, W. M., Basal-level, grade, and peneplain, Jour. Geol., 1898, 10: 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Penck, W., Die morphologische Analyse, Engelhorn. Stuttgare, 1924, 283.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    King, L.C., The study of the world’s plainlands: a new approach to geomorphology, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London, 1950, 106: 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baulig, H., Peneplains and pedplains, Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 1957, 68: 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Budel, Die rilieftypen der flachenspulzone sub-indiens am ostabfall dekans gegen Madras, Colloquium Geographicum, 1965, 25 (33): 93.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    БорисевиЧ Д, В., Коррерряция воЗрасТОВ поверцНоЧТей вьирморавНИвНаНИЯ МаТерИКов СверНоroГо ЮЖНоПо полУШарИй. Грморфолопия. (1): 17.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    БорИсевИч Д. В., ПоверхИостИ вьИBравНИваНИя ПлаТϕломеННьИШ частеЙ котИНеНтов: Иш КорреляцИя И условИя ϕормИроваИНя, 1989 ГерморϕологИя, 2000, (1): 1.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gregory, K. M., Chase, C. G., Tectonic and climatic significance of a late Eocene low-relief, high-level geomorphic surface, Colorado, J. Geophysics Research, 1994, 99 (10): 20141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, Y. J., Significance of collapses in karst caves and landform development, in Karst Landform and Caves (ed. Geomorhological Committee of Geographical Society of China), Beijing: Science Press, 1985, 99.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, Y. J., Transition of undergound landform to surface, in A study of Karst Landform and Caves (ed. Geomorhological Committee of Geographical Society of China), Beijing: Science Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, Y. J., Zhang, D., Type, distribution and evolution of caves in Guizhou, China, Progress of Science in Guizhou, Special Issue, 1984.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bloom, A. L., Geomorphology: A Systematic Analysis of Late Cenozoic Landform, Printice-Hall, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Powell, J.W., Exploration of the Colorado River of the West (1969–1872), Washington, 1875.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trudgill, S.T., Limestone geomorphology, New York: Longman Inc., 1985.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Milliman, J. D., Fluvial sediment dischange to the sea and importance of regional tectonics, in: tectonic uplift and change of climate (ed. Willian F. R.), New York: Plenum Press, 1997, 239.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ceiling, T. E., Late cenozoic vegetation change, atmospheric CO2, and tectonics, in: Tectonic uplift and change of climate (ed. Willian F. R.), New York: Plenum Press, 1997, 313.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yuan, D. X., Karst in China. Beijing: Geological Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ollier, C. D., Ancient landforms, London: Belhave Press, 1991, 74.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qian, X. P., The discovery of karst denudatin surface of the Taihang Stage and the division of physiographicstages, Corsologica Sinica, 1984, (2): 27.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Molina, J. M., Ruiz-Ortiz P.A., Vera, J. A., A review of polyphase karstification in extensional tectonic regimes: Jurassic and Cretaceous examples, Betic Cordillera, southern Spain, Sedimentary Geology, 1999, 129: 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Younger, P. L., Stunell, J. M., Karst and pseudokarst: an artificial distinction? in Geomorphology and Groundwater (ed. Brown, A. G.), Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1995, 121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of GeographyPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Crustal DynamicsCSBBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations