Current Psychology

, Volume 2, Issue 1–3, pp 111–122 | Cite as

Perceived control in continuous loud noise

  • Dylan M. Jones
  • Timothy C. Auburn
  • Antony J. Chapman


The effects of two types of perceived control were assessed for performance during and following exposure to continuous loud noise at 90 dBC. Subjects performed a tracking task during exposure and the Stroop test in the period following exposure. Control could be effected either (1) by attenuating the intensity of the noise or (2) by reducing the difficulty of the tracking task. In both cases subjects were encouraged not to exercise control. Performance in treatments involving loud (90 dBC) and soft (55 dBC) noise served as baseline conditions. Perceived control of task difficulty accentuated the tendency for root-mean-square error to rise during the tracking task. There were no significant effects of noise intensi ty on tracking performance. Loud noise reduced the incidence of errors in the Stroop test but perceived control failed to influence this effect. The results are discussed in terms of the generality of perceived control phenomena.


Tracking Error Tracking Performance Noise Exposure Colour Word Tracking Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Broadbent, D.E. (1980). Low levels of noise and the naming of colours. In J.V. Tobias, G. Jansen & W. Dixon-Ward (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. Rockville, Maryland: American Speech-language-Hearing Association.Google Scholar
  2. Broadbent, D.E. (1981). The effects of moderate levels of noise on human performance. In J. Tobias & E. Schubert (eds.), Hearing Research and Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, S. (1980). Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: a review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 82–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, S. & Spacapan, S. (1978). The aftereffects of stress: an attentional interpretation. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eschenbrenner, J.A. (1971). Effects of intermittent noise on performance of a complex psychomotor task. Human Factors, 13, 59–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Frankenhaeuser, M. & Lundberg, U. (1974). Immediate and delayed effects of noise on performance and arousal. Biological Psychology, 2, 127–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gardner, G.T. (1978). Effects of federal human subjects regulations on data obtained in environmental stressor research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 628–634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gatchel, R.J. & Proctor, J.D. (1976). Physiological correlates of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 27–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Glass, O.C. & Singer, J.E. (1972). Urban Stress: Experiments on Noise and Social Stressors. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hartley, L.R. (1973). Effect of prior noise or prior performance on serial reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartley, L.R. & Adams, J. (1974). Effects of noise on the Stroop test. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 62–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hiroto, D.S. & Seligman, M.E.P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Houston, B.K. (1969). Noise, task difficulty, and Stroop colour-word performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 403–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houston, B.K. & Jones, T.M. (1967). Distraction and Stroop colour-word performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 54–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, D.M. (1979). Stress and memory. In P.E. Morris & M.M.Gruneberg (eds.), Applications of Memory Research, pp. 185–214. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, D.M. (1983). Effects of noise on performance. In D.M. Jones & A.J. Chapman (eds.), Noise and Society. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, D.M. & Broadbent, D.E. (1979). Side-effects of interference with speech by noise. Ergonomics, 22, 1073–1081.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lacey, J.I. (1967). Somatic response patterning and stress: some revisions of activation theory. In M.H. Appley & R. Trumbull (eds.), Psychological Stress. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  19. Mills, R.T. & Krantz, D.S. (1979). Information, choice, and reactions to stress: a field experiment in a blood bank with Iaboratory analogue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 608–620.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Moran, S.L.V. & Loeb, M. (1977). Annoyance and behavioral aftereffects following interfering and non-interfering aircraft noise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 719–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearson, E.S. & Hartley, H.O. (1970). Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Percival, L. & Loeb, M. (1980). Influence of noise characteristics on behavioral aftereffects. Human Factors, 22, 341–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Poulton, E.C. (1974). Tracking Skill and Manual Control. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rotton, J., Olszewski, D., Charleton, M. & Soler, E. (1978). Loud speech, conglomerate noise, and behavioral aftereffects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 360–365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Seligman, M.E.P. (1975). Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  26. Sherrod, D.R., Hage, J.N., Halpern, P.L. & Moore, B.S. (1977). Effects of personal causation and perceived control on responses to an aversive environment: the more control, the better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simpson, G.C., Cox, T. & Rothschild, D.R. (1974). The effects of noise stress on blood glucose levels and skilled performance. Ergonomics, 17, 481–487.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stevens, S.S. (1972). Stability of human performance under intense noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 21, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reaction. Journal of Experim ental Psychology, 18, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Viteles, M.S. & Smith, K.R. (1946). An experimental investigation of the effects of change in atmospheric conditions and noise upon performance. Transactions of the American Society of Heating and Ventilation Engineers, 52, 167–182.Google Scholar
  31. Wohlwill, J.F., Nasar, J.L., De Joy, D.M. & Foruzani, H.H. (1976). Behavioral effects of a noisy environment: task involvement versus passive exposure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 67–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dylan M. Jones
    • 1
  • Timothy C. Auburn
    • 1
  • Antony J. Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied PsychologyUWISTPenylanUK

Personalised recommendations